Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

.z
PUOH/Ap1 PUOWApotsn;)
"~uoqcbl~ Aq u0geu!uu~~~P
pUOqjApO~sn~ pnpuo~ O~ 'u09aJ~S!P J~q JO S!q U! ~8pnf
u09~!WWI ue ~!uu~d (OOOZ) 61"£ § "'}I",.:fJ 8 ~e su09BIn8~'}I "e
O} h}!l!q~U! ~\H ~}!~P 's8u~q :>!uoqd~l~} U! S~S~U1!A\ JO JO~~W~p mu °1
~\H ~AJ~sqo
JO h}!:>Y!~S pu~ AUOW9S~} U! su09:>!pe.Quo:> pu~ ~!:>u~S!suo:>U! '~!OA
SIS~t:Q!A\ ~\HJo JOU~} ~\H 'AUOWnS~} ~\HJo h}!l!q!sn~ld }U~~t{U! ~q} ~ q:>ns
0(S861>
lZ '61 Pzod 969 'UO!S!A!O }U~WAOldw~uf1 °A 'I:>0:>q~8'~ '~~S °AUOWHS~}
'Ana)l"A iUaqPloD OOS "paJ!nbaJ JOU S! aouasaJd IBO!S.(qd ImtJoe '.(uOWHSaJ
UOWH~
l1UO aA!g OJ Jq~!-I at{} seq 8u!-Ieaq aAH1UJs!u!wpe ue )0 J~fqns aqJ qgno1{JIV
IBJO ~A!8 OJ JqS!J ~qJ seq SU!Jeaq ~A!J1UJS!U!wp\?
q8nO1PlV '2
9££ PZ"A\"S SZS 'AO~W "A At!:) se51m)1 ~(OL6I> 69-89Z 'tSZ"S"O L6£
"(SL61 "OW)
~SITII~3H~ DNnIV3H ~INOHd3J3.L on
":)
U09~~s ~etp 686 I U! ~u!Wl~~~p ~!n~J!J q~U!N ~tp JOj sle~ddv
jO pnoJ ~~~S P~!ul1 ~q~ }eq} ~JeA\e ~q O} ~uepodw! oSle S! 11 "J
"q
~pnpuo~ ~q s8u!l~q UOHepod~p ~etp ~J!nbaJ ~~V ~tp jO (q)ZvZ
~V jO ~~u~s~Jd le~!SAqd ~q} U! ~ued!~!ped 8u!le~q ~q~ q~!A\
ue Aq s8u!le~q ~!uoqd~I~}1I }ev pue '~8pnf U0geJ8!WWI
~OU aIe Aldw!s '~!~ed ~V jO }U~SUO~ ~u~sqe '~8pnf U09~!WWI
~e ~}m~S ~V O~U! ~~BJodJO~U! u~aq snv seq A\~!A S!t{J. "(686 I
"J!J V6) 8I~ '9I~ PZ"d v88 'SNl "A eq.md 1I"~~m~s Aq p~z!l°vne
"s8u!p~~oJd
leAOWaIjO s~sodJnd JOj ~~v ~quo (s)(z)(e)OtZ u09~s
s~!1!:) 1!B1~P U! S~U!lB~l{ 1Bpu~IB:) 1~1SBW liB pnpuo:) 01
(nJO) ~~pnf u°!1~!WWIJ~!l{;) ~tpJo ~!lJO ~tpjO A:)!Iod ~tp S! 11
~l{1 sS~lun s~!1P l!B1~P 01 AIIB:)!uol{d~I~1 p~pnpuo:) SABMIB
~lB ~lOj~l~tp pUB U°!1UauB ~1B!P~WW! ~1!nOO1 S~U!l~l{ puoH .~AoqB
H l{dB~B1Bd U! tplOj 1~S ~lB S!l{110j SUOSB~l ~tU . AnB:)!Uol{~1~1
.~pBW S! ~U!lB~l{ pUOqJApo1Sn:)
B 10j 1s~nb~u B U~l{M At!:) l!B1~P ~tp 1B 1U~~ld S! ~~pnf UO!1~!WWI
SN1I3 NO:> SS3:>OMd 300 ~J J~\Ho Aq p~8pnf ~q Ims u~:> 'SS~U}!M ~\H JO ~:>u~J~~dd~