Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

:M:}!A.!:}}U! JO uOH~~oI p~ :}}~a l.aJ.A}0 ~U~l}S ~tp ~l1J JUtlM 'uo!U'!do roo.< 11} (~ (i.tSQnbal ~}O ~1tB:U ~tp SUM ~ 'osJI) ~J.A an 0} tOO pgJfS8 »M no.< QAWH .LA aft no.( mA\
Page 1 and 2:
Videoconferencing in Removal Hearin
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS Organizations 3 Acknowledg
Page 5 and 6:
Lisa Colpoys Executive Director Ill
Page 7 and 8:
informed of what had happened only
Page 9 and 10:
• Nearly 30% of those who had an
Page 11 and 12:
Videoconferencing is increasingly b
Page 13 and 14:
observations with respect to catego
Page 15 and 16:
PART ONE An Overview of Court Video
Page 17 and 18:
does not consider to be “punishme
Page 19 and 20:
angles or screen size will distort
Page 21 and 22:
PART TWO The Chicago Immigration Co
Page 23 and 24:
Immigration law is arcane, often de
Page 25 and 26:
At the Master Calendar hearing, the
Page 27 and 28:
judge, printing and delivering noti
Page 29 and 30:
conclusion of the hearing, when the
Page 31 and 32:
Observed Hearings Staff at the Lega
Page 33 and 34:
The results from these monitoring s
Page 35 and 36:
In total, we conducted two intervie
Page 37 and 38:
Observers witnessed problems caused
Page 39 and 40:
Technical Problems at the Detention
Page 41 and 42:
egularly witnessed attorneys and cl
Page 43 and 44:
Table 4.2: Use of Interpreter and F
Page 45 and 46:
The interpreter was located in the
Page 47 and 48:
were likely to feel more emotionall
Page 49 and 50:
Graph 4.1: Rate of Removal among de
Page 51 and 52:
PART FIVE Recommendations Downtown
Page 53 and 54:
held in one jurisdiction and the co
Page 55 and 56: • EOIR should issue regulations b
Page 57 and 58: listens to the judge and non-Englis
Page 59 and 60: In other administrative hearings, s
Page 61 and 62: CONCLUSION Mandatory detention and
Page 63 and 64: Inadmissibility Grounds: The provis
Page 65 and 66: I 3lqu.L sJu8~~!mmI JO U!~!~O JO sa
Page 67 and 68: x!puaddv H
Page 69 and 70: (JlA) ~U!~U~J~Juo~-~I~l O~P!A o~!lI
Page 71 and 72: °L .8 "6 aJoN) i.sIR!.IaJRW asaqJ
Page 73 and 74: x!puaddv :)
Page 75 and 76: OJ or ~U!AI~lJO pe~tsu! WOOl ~u!le~
Page 77 and 78: .z PUOH/Ap1 PUOWApotsn;) "~uoqcbl~
Page 79 and 80: 'I °2 'pJO:>aJ ~tp JOj suogeInd!}s
Page 81 and 82: '~dOpAU~ ~dB1 ~qJ U! s~dB1 He 3umnd
Page 83 and 84: x!puaddv
Page 85 and 86: NOI.L30aOmNI '1 ,{.n~ss~~u ~ ARw JR
Page 87 and 88: .~ NOISO1:::>NO:::> "AI UJJOjU! }SO
Page 89 and 90: (~weN) :]0 J~uew ~1p UI JOj hl~IOS
Page 91 and 92: (~weN) :Jo J~uew ~q} °1 '::>S\!~ ~
Page 93 and 94: ,nIflOSSIW AJJ3 SVSNV)J : NOll. V30
Page 95 and 96: :NOI.LdV::> DN.I.t\\OTIOd 3Hl. 3l.V
Page 97 and 98: VO9O9 S!OUHII 'oge::>!\{:::> 'pAm u
Page 99 and 100: 86EB-LtE ('ZIE) :.19qUmN P'U!G s.J9
Page 101 and 102: x!puaddv ~
Page 103 and 104: . . . . . . .~Aoqe p::»{~~q~ S.J::
Page 105: . h\~~}U! JO u0ge~ol pue ~}ea .""'n
show all

Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?