Videoconferencing in Removal Hearings: A Case Study of the ...

U~J~~H ..(~.I1JOOO
Z:O~ f:-t0909 'II 'o8~!1IJ
00£ ~~!ns 'p.rnA~lnog uoq~ef ~s~M 111
o8~!qJ ~!1odO,Q~WJo uonepuno~ ~~~!SSV le8~
:U~J:Y.)H "JW J1r.}Q
33HSnr)0 .o3w..n~d3a .s.n
M3!J\3)l UOHtUa!WWI JOJ ~!.JJO 3J\!}n~X3
jo a:J!ffo
a8pnf UO!ID.J8!UJUJ/ ja!1fJ a1f1
'~sod nOA suo!}s~nb ~tp
O} SJ~MS\rn~.rn ~sopu3 'A.I}unro ~q} }noq~no.nH }u~wd!noo ~UpU~J~JUo~P} OOp!AJO ~sn S,PflO;)
UO!}UJ~!WWI ~q} }noqu suo!}s~nb )0 }s!I u ~U!SOPU~ '~OOl '8l A.I1?nUUf )0 J~U~I JOOA JO) nOA "'JU1?1U
.A~Ams mOA U! Inpsn S! UO!}tJWJoJU! S!tp ~oq I
~msopu3
I tOlll1!U~A 'IpDI":J S1f1'::l
OOfl ~",S '7.I(!J :J.mqu7] L.O/f
~ooz '£ q:URW
'AInJ} s.m°A.
~iJpnf uo!Wlii!WW}p!q:::> }trntS!SSV
n~ '.0:1 p1?q:)!W
lJ(}(f2l- --olrV