Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

K [2011]. Length-dependent retention of carbonnanotubes in the pleural space of mice initiatessustained inflammation and progressive fibrosis onthe parietal pleura. Am J Pathol 178(6):2587–2600.Murr LE, Bang JJ, Esquivel EV, Guerrero PA, LopezDA [2004a]. Carbon nanotubes, nanocrystal forms,and complex nanoparticle aggregates in commonfuel-gas combustion sources and the ambient air. JNanopart Res 6(2):241–251.Murr LE, Bang JJ, Lopez DA, Guerrero PA, EsquivelEV [2004b]. Carbon nanotubes and nanocrystalsin methane combustion and the environmental implications.J Mater Sci 39(6):2199–2204.Murray AR, Kisin E, Leonard SS, Young SH, KommineniC, Kagan VE, Castranova V, ShvedovaAA [2009]. Oxidative stress and inflammatory responsein dermal toxicity of single-walled carbonnanotubes. Toxicology 257(3):161–171.Murray AR, Kisin ER, Tkach AV, Yanamala N,Mercer R, Young SH, Fadeel B, Kagan VE, ShvedovaAA [2012]. Factoring in agglomeration of carbonnanotubes and nanofibers for better predictionof their toxicity versus asbestos. Part Fibre Toxicol9:10 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-9-10].Nagai H, Okazaki Y, Chew SH, Misawa N, YamashitaY, Akatsuka S, et al. [2011]. Diameter andrigidity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes are criticalfactors in mesothelial injury and carcinogenesis.PNAS Early edition, pp. 1–9.Nakanishi J (ed) [2011a]. Risk assessment of manufacturednanomaterials: “Approaches”—Overviewof approaches and results. Final report issued onAugust 17, 2011. NEDO project (P06041) “Researchand Development of Nanoparticle CharacterizationMethods.”Nakanishi J (ed) [2011b]. Risk assessment of manufacturednanomaterials: carbon nanotubes (CNTs).Final report issued on August 12, 2011. NEDOproject (P06041) “Research and development ofnanoparticle characterisation methods.”Nanocyl [2009]. Responsible care and nanomaterialscase study Nanocyl. Presentation at EuropeanResponsible Care Conference, Prague. Brussels,Belgium: The European Chemical Industry Council(CEFIC) [http://www.cefic.org/Documents/ResponsibleCare/04_Nanocyl.pdf].NanoSafe [2008]. Are conventional protective devicessuch as fibrous filter media, respirator cartridges,protective clothing and gloves also efficientfor nanoaerosols? DR-325/326-200801-1. Brussels,Belgium: European Commission (EC) [http://www.nanosafe.org/home/liblocal/docs/Dissemination%20report/DR1_s.pdf].Nanotech [2013]. Nanotubes hanging in there... NanotechMagazine. Edition 13, pp. 4–5. [www.futuremarketsinc.com]Nikula KJ, Avila KJ, Griffith WC, Mauderly JL[1997]. Lung tissue responses and sites of particleretention differ between rats and cynomolgusmonkeys exposed chronically to diesel exhaust andcoal dust. Fund Appl Toxicol 37:37–53.Nikula KJ, Vallyathan V, Green FH, Hahn FF[2001]. Influence of exposure concentration ordose on the distribution of particulate materialin rat and human lungs. Environ Health Perspect109(4):311–318.NIOSH [1977]. Occupational exposure samplingstrategy manual. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, Centers for DiseaseControl, National Institute for Occupational Safetyand Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 77–173.NIOSH [1986]. Occupational respiratory diseases.Merchant JA, ed. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, Centers for DiseaseControl, National Institute for Occupational Safetyand Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No.86–102.NIOSH [1994a]. Method 7402: asbestos by TEM. In:NIOSH manual of analytical methods (supplementissue 2, 8/15/94). 4th ed. Schlecht PC, O’Conner PF,eds. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and82 NIOSH CIB 65 • Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2003–154 [www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/pdfs/7402.pdf].NIOSH [1994b]. NIOSH manual of analyticalmethods (NMAM®). Diesel particulate matter(supplement issued 3/15/03). 4th ed. Schlecht PC,O’Conner PF, eds. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, Centers forDisease Control, National Institute for OccupationalSafety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) PublicationNo. 94–113 [www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/].NIOSH [1998]. Particulates not otherwise regulated,respirable. Method 0600 (supplement issuedJanuary 15, 1998). In: NIOSH manual of analyticalmethods. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, Public Health Service,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,National Institute for Occupational Safety andHealth, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94–113[http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/pdfs/0600.pdf].NIOSH [2002]. Hazard review: health effects of occupationalexposure to respirable crystalline silica.Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, Centers for Disease Control, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2002–129.NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH respirator selection logic.Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, Centers for Disease Control, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–100.NIOSH [2006]. Criteria for a recommended standard:occupational exposure to refractory ceramicfibers. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services, Centers for Disease Control,National Institute for Occupational Safety andHealth, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2006–125.NIOSH [2007]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemicalhazards and other databases. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–149.NIOSH [2009a]. Approaches to safe nanotechnology:managing the health and safety concerns withengineered nanomaterials. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, Centersfor Disease Control, National Institute for OccupationalSafety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) PublicationNo. 2009–125.NIOSH [2009b]. NIOSH current intelligence bulletin60: interim guidance for medical screeningand hazard surveillance for workers potentially exposedto engineered nanoparticles. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009–116.NIOSH [2010a]. NIOSH current intelligencebulletin: occupational exposure to carbon nanotubesand nanofibers (public review draft). Cincinnati,OH: U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, Centers for Disease Control, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) [http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket161A/pdfs/carbonNanotubeCIB_PublicReviewOfDraft.pdf].NIOSH [2010b]. A systematic review of the effectivenessof training and education for the protectionof workers. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health.Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services, Centers for Disease Control, NationalInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health,DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2010–127.NIOSH [2011a]. Current intelligence bulletin 63:occupational exposure to titanium dioxide. Cincinnati,OH: U.S. Department of Health and HumanServices, Centers for Disease Control, National Institutefor Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 2011–160.NIOSH [2011b]. Current intelligence bulletin 64:coal mine dust exposures and associated healthNIOSH CIB 65 • Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers83
Page 1 and 2:
CURRENT INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN 65Occ
Page 3 and 4:
Current Intelligence Bulletin 65Occ
Page 5 and 6:
ForewordThe Occupational Safety and
Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryOverviewCarbon nan
Page 9 and 10:
2009; Pauluhn 2010a; Porter et al.
Page 11 and 12:
neurogenic sig nals from sensory ir
Page 13 and 14:
possible. Until the results from an
Page 15 and 16:
••Follow exposure and hazard as
Page 17 and 18:
Periodic Evaluations••Evaluatio
Page 19 and 20:
ContentsForeword ..................
Page 21 and 22:
A.3.2 Comparison of Short-term and
Page 23 and 24:
ESPFeFMPSFPSSgGMGSDHCLHECHEPAhrISOI
Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThis Current Intell
Page 27 and 28:
1 IntroductionMany nanomaterial-bas
Page 29:
2 Potential for ExposureThe novel a
Page 32 and 33:
CNMs, with MWCNT agglomerates obser
Page 34 and 35:
composite materials with local exha
Page 36 and 37:
information on air contaminants. Sa
Page 39 and 40:
3 Evidence for Potential Adverse He
Page 41 and 42:
decreasing agglomerate size increas
Page 43 and 44:
examined up to 60 days post-exposur
Page 45 and 46:
3.3 SWCNT and MWCNTIntraperitoneal
Page 47 and 48:
The same potency sequence was obser
Page 49 and 50:
Table 3-3. Findings from published
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3-7 (Continued). Findings fro
Page 57: Table 3-8. Findings from published
Page 60 and 61: length, respectively) [Muller et al
Page 63 and 64: 5 CNT Risk Assessment and Recommend
Page 65 and 66: A-6). Risk estimates derived from o
Page 67 and 68: Table 5-4. Factors, assumptions, an
Page 69 and 70: and analytical methods. NIOSH is re
Page 71 and 72: Table 5-5. Recommended occupational
Page 73 and 74: deficits in animals or clinically s
Page 75: (3) Rat lung dose estimationIn the
Page 78 and 79: tasks where worker exposures exceed
Page 80 and 81: As part of the evaluation of worker
Page 82 and 83: Table 6-1. EC LODs and LOQs for 25-
Page 84 and 85: 6.2 Engineering ControlsOne of the
Page 86 and 87: Table 6-6 (Continued). Examples of
Page 88 and 89: Table 6-7 (Continued). Engineering
Page 90 and 91: exposure estimates for SWCNT on ind
Page 92 and 93: Table 6-8. Respiratory protection f
Page 94 and 95: ••Workers in areas or in jobs w
Page 97 and 98: 7 Research NeedsAdditional data and
Page 99 and 100: ReferencesACGIH [1984]. Particle si
Page 101 and 102: Bolton RE, Vincent HJ, Jones AD, Ad
Page 103 and 104: eport issued on July 22, 2011. NEDO
Page 105 and 106: Kobayashi N, Naya M, Mizuno K, Yama
Page 107: Methner M, Hodson L, Geraci C [2010
Page 111 and 112: Piegorsch WW, Bailer AF [2005]. Qua
Page 113 and 114: AD, Baron PA [2003]. Exposure to ca
Page 115: Varga C, Szendi K [2010]. Carbon na
Page 119 and 120: ContentsA.1 Introduction ..........
Page 121 and 122: A.1 IntroductionThe increasing prod
Page 123 and 124: provide an informal check on the es
Page 125 and 126: these same dose groups; this effect
Page 127 and 128: Table A-1. Rodent study information
Page 129 and 130: the deposited (no clearance) and th
Page 131 and 132: The other BMDS models failed to con
Page 133 and 134: Figure A-2. Benchmark dose model (m
Page 135 and 136: Figure A-3 (continued). Benchmark d
Page 137 and 138: Table A-3. Benchmark dose estimates
Page 139 and 140: Table A-5. Benchmark dose estimates
Page 141 and 142: histopathology grade 2 or higher lu
Page 143 and 144: Table A-8. Working lifetime percent
Page 145 and 146: developing early-stage adverse lung
Page 147 and 148: Figure A-4. Dose-response relations
Page 149 and 150: cell surface area). However, the wo
Page 151 and 152: purified or unpurified (with differ
Page 153 and 154: Table A-9. Comparison of rat or hum
Page 155 and 156: A.6.1.3 Pulmonary Ventilation RateT
Page 157 and 158: used as the effect levels in evalua
Page 159 and 160:
the DF estimate, although a larger
Page 161 and 162:
or overloading, of particle clearan
Page 163 and 164:
Table A-13. Human-equivalent retain
Page 165 and 166:
A.7.1 Particle CharacteristicsBoth
Page 167 and 168:
and density. The following MMAD and
Page 169:
Table A-15. CNT lung dose normalize
Page 172 and 173:
B.1 Key Terms Related toMedical Sur
Page 175 and 176:
APPENDIX CNIOSH Method 5040
Page 177 and 178:
filter. In the method evaluation, d
Page 179 and 180:
Most of the studies on sampling art
Page 181 and 182:
e analyzed to determine the onset o
Page 184:
Delivering on the Nation’s promis
show all

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?