19.08.2015 Views

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

purified or unpurified (with different types <strong>and</strong>amounts of metals), i.e., 0.08–12 µg/m3 (Tables A–3<strong>and</strong> A–4). Lower risks are estimated at the lowerLOQ of 1 µg/m3, which are approximately 0.5% <strong>to</strong>16% based on the rat subchronic dose-responsedata for the slight/mild lung effects <strong>and</strong> differentlung dose estimation (95% UCL estimates) (TableA–8). Higher risks are estimated for the more sensitiveendpoint of minimal grade 1 lung effects(Table A–7). Additional analyses <strong>and</strong> risk estimatesbased on other methods <strong>and</strong> assumptions are providedin Section A.6.A.6 Sensitivity AnalysesSpecific areas of uncertainty in this CNT risk assessmentare evaluated in this section, including: (1) therat lung dose estimation; (2) the critical effect levelselection in animals <strong>and</strong> relevance <strong>to</strong> humans; <strong>and</strong>(3) alternative assumptions used in the OEL estimationmethods. Sensitivity analyses in these areaswere performed <strong>to</strong> qualitatively <strong>and</strong> quantitativelyevaluate the influence of the different options <strong>and</strong>assumptions on the draft REL [NIOSH 2010].A.6.1 Lung Dose EstimationKey fac<strong>to</strong>rs that influence the estimates of CNTlung burden in rats <strong>and</strong> humans include: (a) thelung geometry <strong>and</strong> airway dimensions; (b) lung <strong>and</strong>breathing parameters (including, functional residualcapacity, <strong>to</strong>tal lung capacity, breathing frequency,<strong>and</strong> tidal volumes; (c) lung retention kinetics; <strong>and</strong>(d) interspecies dose normalization. The depositionfraction is based on the airborne particle size (<strong>and</strong><strong>to</strong> some extent shape for nonspherical particles), onthe breathing pattern (nasal, oral, or combination)<strong>and</strong> minute ventilation, <strong>and</strong> on the lung airway geometry.The ventilation rate depends on the species<strong>and</strong> on the activity level. Reference values are availablefor the average ventilation rates in rats <strong>and</strong> humans[EPA 1988, 1994; ICRP 1994]. The airborneparticle size data (as reported in the animal studies)(Table A–2) were used <strong>to</strong> estimate the depositedlung dose of CNT in rats <strong>and</strong> humans, using sphericalparticle based models. The long-term clearancekinetics have been well studied <strong>and</strong> validated forinhaled poorly soluble spherical particles in rats[Anjilvel <strong>and</strong> Asgharian 1995; Asgharian et al. 2001,2003] <strong>and</strong> in humans [ICRP 1994; Kuempel et al.2001a, b; Gregorat<strong>to</strong> 2010, 2011], but models specificallyfor CNT are not yet available.This section examines some of the key parametervalues used in the lung dose estimation, <strong>and</strong>also characterizes the quantitative influence ofalternative models <strong>and</strong> assumptions. Two studieswere available <strong>to</strong> evaluate the lung dose estimatesin rats. Pauluhn [2010a] <strong>and</strong> Ellinger-Ziegelbauer <strong>and</strong> Pauluhn [2009] provided cobalttracer-based measurements of the CNT lungburden based on cobalt-tracer measurements.These data were used <strong>to</strong> compare MPPD modelbasedestimates. Because of prediction equationchanges in the MPPD model from version 2.0 <strong>to</strong>2.1, which affect the model-predicted rat alveolardeposition fraction predictions (discussedfurther in Section A.2.2), the cobalt tracer-basedestimates are compared <strong>to</strong> each model version(Section A.6.1.2). The influence of assumeddensity on the CNT lung deposition fraction isquantified in addition <strong>to</strong> the evaluation of theMPPD model version 2.0 vs. 2.1 predictions(Section A.6.1.1). The derivation of allometricbased(body weight scaled) lung ventilation rateestimates is also discussed (Section A.6.1.3).A.6.1.1 Lung Dosimetry ModelbasedDeposition Fraction<strong>and</strong> Dose EstimatesThe fraction of inhaled CNT that is deposited inthe respira<strong>to</strong>ry tract is predicted from the aerosolcharacteristics. The deposition mechanisms includeimpaction, sedimentation, interception, <strong>and</strong> diffusion.The aerodynamic diameter, by definition,represents the gravitational settling (sedimentation)behavior of particles [Hinds 1999]. The definitionof aerodynamic diameter st<strong>and</strong>ardizes the shape(<strong>to</strong> spherical) <strong>and</strong> density (<strong>to</strong> that of water, 1 g/ml).The aerodynamic diameter of a particle, regardlessof its shape <strong>and</strong> density, is the diameter of a spherewith the same gravitational settling velocity as theNIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!