19.08.2015 Views

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

or overloading, of particle clearance after reachinga critical lung dose).An alternative approach evaluated was <strong>to</strong> use theMPPD 2.0 [CIIT <strong>and</strong> RIVM 2006] human lungdosimetry model <strong>to</strong> estimate directly the retainedlung burden in humans over a working lifetime.This approach assumes a mode of action in whichthe cumulative retained particle dose is related <strong>to</strong>the adverse lung responses, regardless of the doserate (i.e., the time required <strong>to</strong> reach that dose). Thecumulative exposure concept (concentration ×time), known as “Haber’s Law,” is a typical defaultassumption in risk assessment for long-term exposuresin the absence of other data [US EPA 1994].Some studies in workers (coal miners) have shownthat the working lifetime cumulative exposure <strong>and</strong>the retained lung dose are better predic<strong>to</strong>rs of pulmonaryfibrosis than the average exposure concentrationwithout consideration of duration [NIOSH2011b]. Yet, there remains uncertainty about howwell a cumulative dose received over a short durationmay predict the response <strong>to</strong> the same cumulativedose received over a longer duration (i.e., at alower dose rate). The direction of error could goeither way, depending on the biological mechanismsof response. For example, a lower dose ratemay allow the lung defense mechanisms <strong>to</strong> adapt<strong>to</strong> the exposure (e.g., by increasing clearance or repairmechanisms), which could reduce the adverseresponse at a later time point. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, alonger time in which a substance is in contact withthe tissue may exacerbate the response, resultingin a more severe effect at the later time point. Theactual lung response may be some combination ofthese effects.To evaluate the assumptions used <strong>to</strong> estimate thehuman <strong>and</strong> rat retention kinetics, estimates werecompared from the MPPD2.0 lung dosimetrymodel [CIIT <strong>and</strong> RIVM 2006] <strong>to</strong> the ratio of 10/1for RT H/RT Aused by Pauluhn [2010a]. The rat <strong>and</strong>human lung dosimetry models take in<strong>to</strong> accountthe ventilation rates, the deposition fraction by respira<strong>to</strong>rytract region (predicted from particle size<strong>and</strong> breathing rate <strong>and</strong> pattern, nasal vs. oronasal),<strong>and</strong> the normal average clearance rates. Usingthe particle size <strong>and</strong> breathing rate values for thePauluhn 2010a study (Table A–2), the rat retainedlung burden at the end of the 13 week exposure<strong>to</strong> 0.1 mg/m3 was estimated <strong>to</strong> be ~12 µg (TableA–10). This is similar <strong>to</strong> the 8.7 µg lung burden estimatedfrom the cobalt-tracer based measurement(Table A–10).Assuming that the rat has achieved steady-statelung burden after 13 wk exposure <strong>to</strong> 0.1 mg/m3, thechronic lung burden should also be approximately12 µg. § Extrapolating the rat lung dose of 0.012 mg<strong>to</strong> the human-equivalent lung burden would resultin either:••13.5 mg—estimated by dividing the rat lungdose by an interspecies NF for the average <strong>to</strong>talalveolar macrophage cell volume (i.e., 3.03× 10 10 µm3/3.49 × 10 13 µm3) (rat/human); or••3.0 mg based on the average <strong>to</strong>tal alveolarepithelial cell surface area (0.4 m2/102 m2)(rat/human).The associated 8-hr TWA concentration for 45-yrswould result in human-equivalent lung burdens (estimatedfrom MPPD 2.0 human model [CIIT <strong>and</strong>RIVM 2006]) of 16 µg/m3 <strong>and</strong> 3.5 µg/m3, respectively,for the normalized lung burdens based onthe alveolar macrophage cell volume or the alveolarepithelial cell surface area (Table A–13). The value of16 µg/m3 is approximately 3-fold lower than the ~50µg/m3 as the human equivalent concentration <strong>to</strong> therat NOAEL reported in Pauluhn [2010b] (or 3.5 ×lower than the 58 µg/m3 HEC_LOAEL by applyingan AF of 1.7 without rounding <strong>to</strong> 2). This differenceis due <strong>to</strong> the approximately 3x higher retained lungdose estimates after a 45-year working lifetime (TableA–14) <strong>to</strong> that estimated as a 10-year steady-statelung burden [Pauluhn 2010a]. This suggests that theRT of 10 may underestimate the rat <strong>to</strong> human lungretention kinetics, <strong>and</strong> that a fac<strong>to</strong>r of 35 (i.e., 10 ×3.5) may be more realistic. Since the MPPD modelalready takes in<strong>to</strong> account the ventilation rate <strong>and</strong>deposition fraction, the difference in the humanretained lung dose estimates is due <strong>to</strong> greater§At 2 years, the MPPD model predicted a lung burdenof 13 µg <strong>and</strong> a lung burden plus lung-associatedlymph node burden of 23 µg.NIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!