Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
length, respectively) [Muller et al. 2009; Liang et al.2010] did not produce mesothelioma. These findingsare consistent with those reported by Yamashitaet al. [2010] <strong>and</strong> Nagai et al. [2011] who foundthat MWCNT injected in<strong>to</strong> the peri<strong>to</strong>neal cavity ofmice or rats generated inflammation/genetic damage<strong>and</strong> mesothelioma that were related <strong>to</strong> the dimensionof the CNT. Results from these peri<strong>to</strong>nealassay studies indicate that CNT of specific dimensions<strong>and</strong> durability can cause inflammation, fibrosis,<strong>and</strong> mesothelial tumors in mice <strong>and</strong> in rats;however, additional experimental animal researchis needed <strong>to</strong>: (1) provide quantitative data on thebiopersistence of different types of CNT in the lung<strong>and</strong>, (2) address the key question as <strong>to</strong> the precisedimensions (<strong>and</strong> possibly other physical-chemicalcharacteristics) of CNT that pose a potential pathogenicrisk for cancer including mesothelioma.As synthesized, raw (unpurified) CNT, contain asmuch as 30% catalytic metals. Catalytic metals,such as iron-rich SWCNT, can generate hydroxylradicals in the presence of hydrogen peroxide <strong>and</strong>organic (lipid) peroxides [Kagan et al. 2006], <strong>and</strong>when human epidermal keratinocytes cells are exposed<strong>to</strong> unpurified SWCNT (in vitro cellular studies),oxidant injury occurs [Shvedova et al. 2003].These catalytic metals can be removed from rawCNT by acid treatment or by high temperature <strong>to</strong>yield purified CNT with low metal content. Removalof catalytic metals abolishes the ability ofSWCNT or MWCNT <strong>to</strong> generate hydroxyl radicals.However, in labora<strong>to</strong>ry animal studies the pulmonarybioactivity of SWCNT does not appear <strong>to</strong>be affected by the presence or absence of catalyticmetals. Lam et al. [2004] compared the pulmonaryresponse of mice <strong>to</strong> intratracheal instillation of raw(containing 25% metal catalyst) with purified (~2%iron) SWCNT <strong>and</strong> found that the granuloma<strong>to</strong>usreaction was not dependent on metal contamination.Likewise, the acute inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry reaction ofmice after aspiration of raw (30% iron) versus purified(< 1% iron) SWCNT was not affected by metalcontent [Shvedova et al. 2005, 2008].Pulmonary exposure <strong>to</strong> CNT have shown systemicresponses including an increase in inflamma<strong>to</strong>rymedia<strong>to</strong>rs in the blood, as well as oxidant stress inaortic tissue <strong>and</strong> increase plaque formation in anatherosclerotic mouse model [Li et al. 2007; Erdelyet al. 2009]. Pulmonary exposure <strong>to</strong> MWCNTalso depresses the ability of coronary arterioles <strong>to</strong>respond <strong>to</strong> dila<strong>to</strong>rs [Staple<strong>to</strong>n et al. 2011]. Thesecardiovascular effects may be due <strong>to</strong> neurogenicsignals from sensory irritant recep<strong>to</strong>rs in the lung.Mechanisms, such as inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry signals or neurogenicpathways causing these systemic responses,are under investigation.Results from in vitro cellular studies have shownthat SWCNT can cause geno<strong>to</strong>xicity <strong>and</strong> abnormalchromosome number, because of interference withmi<strong>to</strong>sis (cell division), by disrupting the mi<strong>to</strong>ticspindles in dividing cells <strong>and</strong> inducing the formationof anaphase bridges among the nuclei [Sargentet al. 2009]. In vitro studies also indicate that exposure<strong>to</strong> CNF can cause geno<strong>to</strong>xicity (micronuclei)as a result of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production,which in turn reacts with DNA, <strong>and</strong> byinterfering physically with the DNA/chromosomes<strong>and</strong>/or mi<strong>to</strong>tic apparatus [Kisin et al. 2011]. Lowdose,long-term exposure of bronchial epithelialcells <strong>to</strong> MWCNT has been shown <strong>to</strong> induce celltransformation, <strong>and</strong> these transformed cells inducetumors after injection in<strong>to</strong> nude mice [Stueckle etal. 2011; Wang et al. 2011].Currently, there are no studies reported in the literatureon the adverse health effects in workers producingor using CNT or CNF. However, becausehumans can also develop lung inflammation <strong>and</strong>fibrosis in response <strong>to</strong> inhaled particles <strong>and</strong> fibers,it is reasonable <strong>to</strong> assume that at equivalent exposures(e.g., lung burden/alveolar epithelial cell surface)<strong>to</strong> CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF, workers may also be at riskof developing these adverse lung effects.Although data on workplace exposures <strong>to</strong> CNT <strong>and</strong>CNF are limited, aerosolization of CNT <strong>and</strong> CNFhas been shown <strong>to</strong> occur at a number of operationsduring research, production, <strong>and</strong> use of CNT <strong>and</strong>CNF, including such work tasks as transferring,weighing, blending, <strong>and</strong> mixing. Worker exposure<strong>to</strong> airborne CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF has frequently been34 NIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>