Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>and</strong> analytical methods. NIOSH is recommendingthat NIOSH Method 5040 [NIOSH 1994; Birch2004a, b] be used <strong>to</strong> measure workplace airborneexposure <strong>to</strong> respirable CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF.An upper estimate of the LOQ of Method 5040(7 µg/m 3 ) was proposed as the draft REL (8-hr TWA)for CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF [NIOSH 2010]. This upper limitwas based on <strong>to</strong>tal carbon (TC) results found forfilter media from different vendors <strong>and</strong> lots, by differentlabora<strong>to</strong>ries, <strong>and</strong> during a 6-month period.In practice, when elemental carbon (EC) results areused from media blanks submitted with the samples<strong>to</strong> estimate the LOQ, a much lower value can beachieved (Section 6.1). It is important <strong>to</strong> note thatthe LOQ for NIOSH Method 5040 depends on themedia blank variability, filter area sampled, portionof filter analyzed, <strong>and</strong> the collected sample air volume.As discussed in Section 6.1, under optimumconditions an LOQ of 1 µg/m 3 can be obtained foran 8-hr respirable sample collected on a 25-mmfilter at a flow rate of 4 liters per minute (lpm).Considering the potential uncertainties in estimatingthe health risks <strong>and</strong> current limitations of analyticalmethodologies, NIOSH is recommending aREL of 1 µg/m 3 EC as an 8-hr TWA airborne respirablemass concentration for up <strong>to</strong> a 40-hr work week.For working lifetime exposures at 1 µg/m 3 , the MLErisk estimates for slight/mild level of lung effects(based on the rat subchronic inhalation studies ofMWCNT) range from 0.23% <strong>to</strong> 10%, <strong>and</strong> the 95%UCL estimates range from 0.53% <strong>to</strong> 16% dependingon the rat study <strong>and</strong> the assumptions used in estimatingthe CNT lung dose (Tables 5–2 <strong>and</strong> A–8).The more sensitive endpoint of minimal level oflung effects in the rat subchronic inhalation studieswere associated with MLE risk estimates of 2.4% <strong>to</strong>33% <strong>and</strong> 95% UCL estimates of 5.3% <strong>to</strong> 54% (Tables5–2 <strong>and</strong> A–7). Estimates of a 45-yr working lifetimeno-effect concentration (8-hr TWA) based onthe NOAEL or LOAEL estimates from the rat subchronicstudies are < 1 µg/m 3 (8-hr TWA) (SectionA.6.3). The estimates based on the short-termstudies of SWCNT <strong>and</strong> MWCNT in rats <strong>and</strong> miceare consistent with those from the subchronic studiesof MWCNT in rats (Section A.3).NIOSH recognizes that the REL may not be completelyhealth protective <strong>and</strong> that there is uncertaintyin these risk estimates, but maintaining exposuresbelow the REL should help <strong>to</strong> lower workers’ riskof developing occupational lung disease over aworking lifetime. The REL <strong>and</strong> other recommendationsin this CIB should also assist employers inestablishing an occupational health surveillanceprogram that includes elements of hazard <strong>and</strong>medical surveillance. Until improved methods <strong>to</strong>measure airborne exposures <strong>to</strong> CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF areestablished, continued efforts should be made <strong>to</strong>reduce airborne concentrations <strong>to</strong> as low as possiblebelow the REL. Approaches <strong>to</strong> optimize thesampling <strong>and</strong> analysis of exposures are discussed inSection 6.1 <strong>and</strong> Appendix C. Examples of engineeringcontrols <strong>to</strong> reduce or eliminate workers’ exposures<strong>to</strong> CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF are provided in Section 6.2.Additional guidance, including personal protectiveequipment, respira<strong>to</strong>rs, training, <strong>and</strong> medical surveillanceis provided in Sections 6.3 through 6.7.Based on available workplace exposure data, it isnot possible for NIOSH <strong>to</strong> determine whether theNIOSH REL can be achieved in all workplaceswhere exposure <strong>to</strong> CNT <strong>and</strong> CNF occur; however,exposure data that have been reported indicatethat implementing appropriate engineering controlmeasures (e.g., local exhaust ventilation, enclosures)can eliminate or greatly reduce worker exposures[Han et al. 2008a; Methner et al. 2008; Tsaiet al. 2009; Johnson et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2010; Cena<strong>and</strong> Peters 2011; Dahm et al. 2011].5.2 Other Derived<strong>Occupational</strong> <strong>Exposure</strong>Limits for CNTOne of the earliest OELs for CNT was proposedby the British St<strong>and</strong>ards Institute [BSI 2007]—thebenchmark exposure limit (BEL) of 0.01 fiber/cm 3 ,or one-tenth of their asbes<strong>to</strong>s exposure limit (Table5–5). Nanocyl [2009] derived an estimated OELof 2.5 µg/m 3 for an 8-hr TWA exposure based onapplying an overall assessment (a.k.a. uncertainty)fac<strong>to</strong>r of 40 <strong>to</strong> the LOAEL of 0.1 mg/m 3 in theNIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>43