19.08.2015 Views

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3 SWCNT <strong>and</strong> MWCNTIntraperi<strong>to</strong>neal StudiesIntraperi<strong>to</strong>neal injection studies in rodents havebeen frequently used as screening assays for potentialmesotheliogenic activity in humans. To date,exposures <strong>to</strong> only a few fiber types are known <strong>to</strong>produce mesotheliomas in humans; these includethe asbes<strong>to</strong>s minerals <strong>and</strong> erionite fibers. Severalanimal studies [Takagi et al. 2008; Pol<strong>and</strong> et al.2008; Muller et al. 2009; Varga <strong>and</strong> Szendi 2010;Murphy et al. 2011] have been conducted <strong>to</strong> investigatethe hazard potential of various sizes <strong>and</strong> dosesof MWCNT <strong>and</strong> SWCNT <strong>to</strong> cause a carcinogenicresponse. Takagi et al. [2008] reported on the intraperi<strong>to</strong>nealinjection of 3 mg of MWCNT in p53+/- mice (a tumor-sensitive, genetically engineeredmouse model), in which approximately 28% of thestructures were > 5 µm in length with an averagediameter of 100 nm. After 25 weeks, 88% of micetreated with MWCNT revealed moderate <strong>to</strong> severefibrotic peri<strong>to</strong>neal adhesions, fibrotic peri<strong>to</strong>nealthickening, <strong>and</strong> a high incidence of macroscopicperi<strong>to</strong>neal tumors. His<strong>to</strong>logical examination foundmesothelial lesions near fibrosis <strong>and</strong> granulomas.Similar findings were also seen in the crocidoliteasbes<strong>to</strong>s-treated positive control mice. Minimalmesothelial reactions <strong>and</strong> no mesotheliomas wereproduced by the same dose of (nonfibrous) C 60fullerene. Pol<strong>and</strong> et al. [2008] reported that theperi<strong>to</strong>neal (abdominal) injection of long MW-CNT—but not short MWCNT—induced inflammation<strong>and</strong> granuloma<strong>to</strong>us lesions on the abdominalside of the diaphragm at 1 week post-exposure.This study, in contrast <strong>to</strong> the Takagi et al. [2008]study, used wild type mice exposed <strong>to</strong> a much lowerdose (50 µg) of MWCNT. Although this studydocumented acute inflammation, it did not evaluatewhether this inflammation would persist <strong>and</strong>progress <strong>to</strong> mesothelioma. Murphy et al. [2011]found similar findings in C57BI/6 mice that were injectedwith different types of MWCNT composed ofdifferent tube dimensions <strong>and</strong> characteristics (e.g.,tangled) or injected with mixed-length amosite asbes<strong>to</strong>s.Mice were injected with a 5 µg dose directlyin<strong>to</strong> the pleural space <strong>and</strong> evaluated after 24 hours, 1,NIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>4, 12, <strong>and</strong> 24 weeks. Mice injected with long (> 15µm) MWCNT or asbes<strong>to</strong>s showed significantlyincreased granulocytes in the pleural lavage, comparedwith the vehicle control at 24 hours post exposure.Long MWCNT caused rapid inflammation<strong>and</strong> persistent inflammation, fibrotic lesions, <strong>and</strong>mesothelial cell proliferation at the parietal pleuralsurface at 24 weeks post exposure. Short (< 4 µm)<strong>and</strong> tangled MWCNT did not cause a persistent inflamma<strong>to</strong>ryresponse <strong>and</strong> were mostly cleared fromthe intrapleural space within 24 hours.A lack of a carcinogenic response was reported byMuller et al. [2009] <strong>and</strong> Varga <strong>and</strong> Szendi [2010]in rats, <strong>and</strong> by Liang et al. [2010] in mice, followingintraperi<strong>to</strong>neal injection or implantation ofMWCNT or SWCNT. No mesotheliomas werenoted 2 years after intraperi<strong>to</strong>neal injection ofMWCNT in rats at a single dose of 2 or 20 mg[Muller et al. 2009] or MWCNT (phosphorylcholine-grafted)in mice when given daily doses ofeither 10, 50, or 250 mg/kg <strong>and</strong> evaluated at day28 [Liang et al. 2010]. However, the MWCNT samplesused in the Muller et al. [2009] <strong>and</strong> Liang etal. [2010] studies were very short (avg. < 1 µm inlength observed by Muller et al. [2009] <strong>and</strong> < 2 µmin length observed by Liang et al. [2010]), <strong>and</strong> thefindings were consistent with the low biologicalactivity observed in the Pol<strong>and</strong> et al. [2008] studywhen mice were exposed <strong>to</strong> short MWCNT. Varga<strong>and</strong> Szendi [2010] reported on the implantation ofeither MWCNT or SWCNT in F-344 rats (six pergroup) at a dose of 10 mg (25 mg/kg bw). Gelatincapsules containing either SWCNT (< 2 nm diameters× 4–15 µm lengths), MWCNT (10–30 nm diameters× 1–2 µm lengths), or crystalline zinc oxide(negative control) were implanted in<strong>to</strong> the peri<strong>to</strong>nealcavity. His<strong>to</strong>logical examination at 12 monthsrevealed only a granuloma<strong>to</strong>us reaction of foreignbody type with epithelioid <strong>and</strong> multinucleated giantcells in CNT-exposed animals. No information wasreported on what effect the delivery of SWCNT <strong>and</strong>MWCNT in gelatin capsules had on their dispersionin the peri<strong>to</strong>neal given the tendency of CNT <strong>to</strong>agglomerate. If SWCNT <strong>and</strong> MWCNT remainedagglomerated following delivery, this may have19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!