19.08.2015 Views

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

examined up <strong>to</strong> 60 days post-exposure [Mulleret al. 2005]. Rats that received ground MWCNT(0.7 µm) showed greater dispersion in the lungs,<strong>and</strong> fibrotic lesions were observed in the deep lungs(alveolar region). In rats treated with ungroundMWCNT (5.9 µm), fibrosis appeared mainly inthe airways rather than in the lung parenchyma.The biopersistence of the unground MWCNT wasgreater than that of the ground MWCNT (81% vs.36 %). At an equal mass dose, ground MWCNTproduced a similar inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> fibrogenic responseas chrysotile asbes<strong>to</strong>s <strong>and</strong> a greater responsethan ultrafine carbon black [Muller et al. 2005].Similar findings have been reported by Aiso etal. [2010], in which rats exposed <strong>to</strong> IT doses of0.04 <strong>and</strong> 0.16 mg of dispersed MWCNT (meanlength-5 µm, diameter-88 nm) caused transientinflammation, <strong>and</strong> persistent granulomas <strong>and</strong> alveolarwall fibrosis. These acute effects have alsobeen reported in guinea pigs at IT doses of 12.5 mg[Grubek-Jaworska et al. 2005] <strong>and</strong> 15 mg [Huczkoet al. 2005]; in mice at doses of 0.05 mg (average diameterof 50 nm, average length of 10 µm) [Li et al.2007], <strong>and</strong> at 5, 20, <strong>and</strong> 50 mg/kg [Park et al. 2009];<strong>and</strong> in rats [Liu et al. 2008] dosed at 1, 3, 5, or 7 mg(diameters of 40 <strong>to</strong> 60 nm, lengths of 0.5 <strong>to</strong> 5 µm). Incontrast, Elgrabli et al. [2008a] reported cell deathbut no his<strong>to</strong>pathological lesions or fibrosis in rats exposedat doses of 1, 10, or 100 µg MWCNT (diametersof 20 <strong>to</strong> 50 nm, lengths of 0.5 <strong>to</strong> 2 µm). Likewise,Kobayashi et al. [2010] observed only transient lunginflammation <strong>and</strong> a granuloma<strong>to</strong>us response inrats exposed <strong>to</strong> a dispersed suspension of MWCNT(0.04–1 mg/kg). No fibrosis was reported, but theauthors did not use a collagen stain for his<strong>to</strong>pathology,which would have compromised the sensitivity<strong>and</strong> specificity of their lung tissue analysis.In a study of rats administered MWCNT or crocidoliteasbes<strong>to</strong>s by intrapulmonary spraying (IPS),exposure <strong>to</strong> either material produced inflammationin the lungs <strong>and</strong> pleural cavity in addition <strong>to</strong> mesothelialproliferative lesions [Xu et al. 2012]. Fourgroups of six rats each were given 0.5 ml of 500 µgsuspensions, once every other day, five times overa 9-day period <strong>and</strong> then evaluated. MWCNT <strong>and</strong>crocidolite were found <strong>to</strong> translocate from the lung<strong>to</strong> the pleural cavity after administration. MWCNT<strong>and</strong> crocidolite were also observed in the mediastinallymph nodes suggesting that a probable routeof translocation of the fibers is lymphatic flow.Analysis of tissue sections found MWCNT <strong>and</strong>crocidolite in focal granuloma<strong>to</strong>us lesions in thealveoli <strong>and</strong> in alveolar macrophages.3.2.3 Inhalation StudiesSeveral short-term inhalation studies using mice orrats have been conducted <strong>to</strong> assess the pulmonary[Mitchell et al. 2007; Arkema 2008; Ma-Hock et al.2009; Porter et al. 2009; Ryman-Rasmussen et al.2009b; Pauluhn 2010a; Wolfarth et al. 2011] <strong>and</strong>systemic immune effects [Mitchell et al. 2007] fromexposure <strong>to</strong> MWCNT. Mitchell et al. [2007] reportedthe results of a whole-body short-term inhalationstudy with mice exposed <strong>to</strong> MWCNT (diameters of10 <strong>to</strong> 20 nm, lengths of 5 <strong>to</strong> 15 µm) at concentrationsof 0.3, 1, or 5 mg/m 3 for 7 or 14 days (6 hr/day) (although there was some question regardingwhether these structures were actually MWCNT[Lison <strong>and</strong> Muller 2008]). His<strong>to</strong>pathology of lungsof exposed animals showed alveolar macrophagescontaining black particles; however, there was noobserved inflammation or tissue damage. Systemicimmunosuppression was observed after 14 days, althoughwithout a clear concentration-response relationship.Mitchell et al. [2009] reported that the immunosuppressionmechanism of MWCNT appears<strong>to</strong> involve a signal originating in the lungs that activatescyclooxygenase enzymes in the spleen. Porteret al. [2009] reported significant pulmonary inflammation<strong>and</strong> damage in mice 1 day after inhalation ofwell-dispersed MWCNT (10 mg/m 3 , 5 hr/day, 2–12days; mass aerodynamic diameter of 1.3 µm, countaerodynamic diameter of 0.4 µm). In addition, granulomaswere also observed encapsulating MWCNTin the terminal bronchial/proximal alveolar regionof the lung. In an inhalation (nose-only) study withmice exposed <strong>to</strong> 30 mg/m 3 MWCNT (lengths of 0.5<strong>to</strong> 50 µm) for 6 hours, a high incidence (9 of 10 mice)of fibrotic lesions occurred [Ryman-Rasmussen etal. 2009b]. MWCNT were found in the subpleuralNIOSH CIB 65 • <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Nanotubes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanofibers</strong>17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!