29.08.2015 Views

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accepted even within Brethren circles. 622 However, with the death <strong>of</strong> Irving<br />

and the cessation <strong>of</strong> the Morning Watch, Darby’s scheme, with its rigid<br />

distinction between Israel and the Church, came to dominate dispensational<br />

thinking. Prior to the rise <strong>of</strong> Dispensationalism it was common to divide<br />

history into two or three dispensations. Jonathan Edwards had acknowledged<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> unanimity even on the distinction between the Old and <strong>New</strong><br />

Testaments. ‘There is, perhaps, no part <strong>of</strong> divinity attended with so much<br />

intricacy, and wherein orthodox divines so much differ, as in stating the<br />

precise agreement and difference between the two dispensations <strong>of</strong> Moses<br />

and Christ.’ 623 In his principal work on the dispensations published in 1823,<br />

George Faber distinguished three stages in God's gracious dealing with<br />

mankind: Patriarchal, Levitical, and <strong>Christian</strong>. However, unlike Darby, he did<br />

not regard them as necessarily consecutive nor was each a remedy for the<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> the previous, ‘From the time <strong>of</strong> the fall down to the termination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world, man lives under one and the same system <strong>of</strong> divine grace, a system,<br />

which was rendered necessary for him by the very circumstances <strong>of</strong> the fall,<br />

and which therefore at no one period can differ essentially from itself.’ 624<br />

Irving was also using the term dispensation to contrast God’s<br />

contemporary dealings with Israel and the Church by 1828. 625<br />

Edward Miller<br />

quotes Irving’s notes <strong>of</strong> the first Albury conference: ‘perfect unanimity on the<br />

following … that the <strong>Christian</strong> Dispensation was to be terminated, ending in<br />

the destruction <strong>of</strong> the visible Church, like the Jewish; during which<br />

“judgements” the Jews were to be restored to Palestine.’ 626<br />

The clearest expression <strong>of</strong> Darby’s thinking on the dispensations is to<br />

be found in ‘The Apostasy <strong>of</strong> the Successive Dispensations’ published in The<br />

Bible and Trust Depot, 1962) 11, p363.<br />

622<br />

Ryrie attempts, unconvincingly, to show that the idea <strong>of</strong> dispensations were latent in the<br />

writings <strong>of</strong> the French mystic Pierre Poiret (1646-1719); an amillennial Calvinist John<br />

Edwards (1639-1716) and Isaac Watts (1674-1748). See Ryrie, Dispensationalism,<br />

(Chicago, Moody Press, 1995), pp. 65-71.<br />

623<br />

Jonathan Edwards, ‘On Full Communion’, The Complete Works <strong>of</strong> Jonathan Edwards,<br />

volume 1 (Edinburgh, Banner <strong>of</strong> Truth, 1974), p160.<br />

624<br />

George Stanley Faber, ‘On the peculiar genius <strong>of</strong> the three dispensations, Patriarchal,<br />

Levitical, and <strong>Christian</strong>,’ A Treatise on the Genius and Object <strong>of</strong> the Patriarchal, the<br />

Levitical and the <strong>Christian</strong> Dispensations, (London, C & J. Rivington, 1823), p2.<br />

625<br />

Edward Irving, The Last Days A Discourse on the Evil Character <strong>of</strong> These Our Times,<br />

Proving Them to be The ‘Perilous Times’ and the ‘Last Days’, (London, James Nisbit,<br />

1850), p10.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!