29.08.2015 Views

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M.R. DeHann (1946) Hal Lindsey (1973)<br />

‘In Revelation 9:13-21 we have a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> an army <strong>of</strong> two hundred<br />

million horsemen ... seems to be a<br />

supernatural army <strong>of</strong> horrible beings,<br />

probably demons, who are permitted<br />

to plague the unrepentant sinners on<br />

the earth.’ 733<br />

‘The four angels <strong>of</strong> Revelation<br />

9:14-15 will mobilize an army <strong>of</strong><br />

200 million soldiers from east <strong>of</strong><br />

the Euphrates ... I believe these<br />

200 million troops are Red Chinese<br />

soldiers accompanied by other<br />

Eastern allies.’ 734<br />

Figure 5: An example <strong>of</strong> the contradiction between the literal interpretation <strong>of</strong> Revelation 9 by<br />

DeHaan and Lindsey<br />

For DeHann and also LaHaye, the 200 million are ‘a supernatural horde <strong>of</strong><br />

200 million demonic horsemen’ 735 while for Lindsey and Schuyler English they<br />

are literally Chinese soldiers. 736 Lindsey does, however, suggest their ‘horses’<br />

are symbolic for mobilized ballistic missile launchers. 737 Each claims his is a<br />

‘literal’ interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text. William Hendrikson raises several questions<br />

about this form <strong>of</strong> hermeneutics in his own commentary on the book <strong>of</strong><br />

Revelation:<br />

‘Do these symbols refer to specific events, single happenings, dates or<br />

persons in history? For if they do, then we may well admit that we<br />

cannot interpret them. Because among the thousands <strong>of</strong> dates and<br />

events and persons in history that show certain traits <strong>of</strong> resemblance<br />

to the symbol in question, who is able to select the one and only date,<br />

event or person that was forecast by this particular symbol? Confusion<br />

results. We get thousands <strong>of</strong> “interpretations” but no certainty. And the<br />

Apocalypse remains a closed book.’ 738<br />

Indeed some have described this form <strong>of</strong> literalism as a licence for ‘full-scale<br />

exegetical exploitation.’ 739 Tim LaHaye’s ten volume Left Behind series, for<br />

example, which provides a fictional account <strong>of</strong> the Rapture and Tribulation,<br />

733 M. R. DeHann, Revelation, 35 Simple Studies in the Major Themes <strong>of</strong> Revelation, (Grand<br />

Rapids, Zondervan, 1946), p148.<br />

734 Lindsey, There’s, op.cit., pp142-143.<br />

735 Tim LaHaye & Jerry B. Jenkins, Are We Living in the End Times?, (Wheaton, Tyndale<br />

House, 1999), pp190-192.<br />

736 Schuyler English, <strong>New</strong>, op.cit., p1334.<br />

737 Lindsey, There’s, op.cit., p143.<br />

738 William Hendrikson, More than Conquerors, (London, Inter-Varsity, 1962). p40-41.<br />

739 Frank Kermode, ‘Can we say absolutely anything we like?’ Art, Politics, and Will: Essays<br />

in Honour <strong>of</strong> Lionel Trilling, edited by Quentin Anderson (<strong>New</strong> York, Basic, 1977),<br />

pp159-72, cited in Kathleen C. Boone, The Bible Tells Them So (London, SCM, 1989),<br />

p44.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!