29.08.2015 Views

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If this particular reference to sacrifice need not be taken literally then the<br />

whole presuppositional base <strong>of</strong> dispensationalism is seriously weakened,<br />

flawed by its own internal inconsistency. 980 Following a literal reading, the<br />

sacrifice <strong>of</strong> a young bullock cannot be synonymous with a memorial <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

which only consisted <strong>of</strong> grain and oil. 981 The immediate context for Ezekiel’s<br />

vision <strong>of</strong> a rebuilt Temple is the promised return <strong>of</strong> the Jews from Babylonian<br />

exile, not some long distant eschatological event. A futurist interpretation<br />

would have been meaningless to the exiles longing to return to Israel.<br />

Furthermore, if Ezekiel were referring to some future millennial age, according<br />

to Mosaic law, Jesus Christ could not serve in such a Temple because he is<br />

not <strong>of</strong> the tribe <strong>of</strong> Levi. 982 Even if he could, it would surely be incongruous for<br />

Jesus to <strong>of</strong>fer animal sacrifices when the <strong>New</strong> Testament asserts he has<br />

replaced them by the shedding <strong>of</strong> his own blood. 983 Such an interpretation<br />

undermines the <strong>New</strong> Testament emphasis that the sacrifice <strong>of</strong> Christ was<br />

sufficient, final and complete. 984 If religious Jews do indeed rebuild their<br />

Temple and reinstitute sacrifices for the atonement <strong>of</strong> sin it will simply<br />

demonstrate their rejection <strong>of</strong> the atoning work <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ. For <strong>Christian</strong>s<br />

to support them in this has been described as apostasy. 985 Several<br />

commentators even equate the ‘abomination <strong>of</strong> desolation’ with ‘the blood <strong>of</strong><br />

swine’ in Isaiah 66:3 and the Temple sacrifices which were <strong>of</strong>fered after the<br />

death <strong>of</strong> Christ between 33 and 70 AD, claiming it was these that desecrated<br />

the Temple. 986 Indeed, George Pember, an early dispensationalist, takes a<br />

futurist view and yet controversially applies the verse to the renewal <strong>of</strong><br />

sacrifices in the rebuilt Temple:<br />

‘Then, in reference to the sacrifices which are again being <strong>of</strong>fered, the<br />

Lord adds; - “He that killeth the ox is as the slayer <strong>of</strong> a man: he that<br />

sacrificeth the sheep as one that breaketh the neck <strong>of</strong> a dog: he that<br />

<strong>of</strong>fereth an oblation, it is swine’s blood: he that causeth incense to rise<br />

up as a memorial is as one that blesseth an idol.” Nevertheless, the<br />

980 Venema, op.cit., p285<br />

981 Leviticus 2:2, 9, 16.<br />

982 Hebrews 7:14. Venema, op.cit., p286.<br />

983 DeMar, Last, op.cit., p85.<br />

984 Hebrews 2:17; Romans 3:25.<br />

985 Hebrews 6:4-6; 9:25-26; 10:1-3.<br />

986 DeMar, Last, op.cit., p86; Edward J. Young, The Book <strong>of</strong> Isaiah. 3 volumes (Grand<br />

Rapids, Eerdmans, 1972), volume 3, p520.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!