29.08.2015 Views

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

still apply. An examination <strong>of</strong> the scriptural claim to the land will lead to an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> how the borders <strong>of</strong> Eretz Israel are defined.<br />

4.1 Eretz Israel: In Prophecy Fulfilled<br />

The claim to the land is based on the covenant God made with Abraham in<br />

Genesis 12, 13 and 15. Fruchtenbaum says Abraham is ‘commanded to<br />

make what amounts to the first Holy Land tour <strong>of</strong> Israel, for all the land that he<br />

sees on its length and breadth is his.’ 877 The covenant is later confirmed to<br />

Isaac in Genesis 26 and Jacob in Genesis 28. Both Isaac and Jacob are<br />

promised that they and their descendants will possess the land. By the time <strong>of</strong><br />

Moses, the Israelites are reminded that their residence in the land was,<br />

however, conditional. They are warned that if they rebel against God they<br />

would be ‘scattered among the nations’ (Leviticus 26:33), but that if they<br />

confess their sins, ‘I will remember my covenant with Jacob and my covenant<br />

with Isaac, and my covenant with Abraham, and I will remember the land’<br />

(Leviticus 26:42). Invariably, however, <strong>Christian</strong> Zionists have minimised the<br />

conditionality <strong>of</strong> the covenants in favour <strong>of</strong> Israel’s unconditional ‘rights’.<br />

McNeile, for example, at the annual LJS conference <strong>of</strong> 1822, expressed the<br />

hope that the Jewish people would, ‘unite in claiming possession <strong>of</strong> that land<br />

which was given to them as a “heritage forever.”’ 878<br />

During the 19 th Century, with the rise <strong>of</strong> the Jewish Zionist movement,<br />

from 1948 with the founding <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Israel and 1967 with the capture <strong>of</strong><br />

East Jerusalem, the contemporary State <strong>of</strong> Israel has increasingly come to be<br />

seen as the realisation <strong>of</strong> God’s covenant promises. As Hal Lindsey has<br />

expressed it, ‘To Israel as a nation were made unique promises … they were<br />

the only nation that was promised a specific plot <strong>of</strong> land, a city, and a<br />

kingdom.’ 879 David Brickner reflects the views <strong>of</strong> contemporary <strong>Christian</strong><br />

Zionists generally when he affirms, ‘I believe the modern day State <strong>of</strong> Israel is<br />

a miracle <strong>of</strong> God and a fulfilment <strong>of</strong> Bible prophecy.’ 880 John Hagee and John<br />

Walvoord draw out the theological significance <strong>of</strong> these events. Hagee, for<br />

877 Arnold Fruchtenbaum, ‘The Land is Mine,’ Issues, 2.4. http://www.jewsforjesus.org<br />

878 McNeile, op.cit., p435.<br />

879 Lindsey, Road, op.cit., p197.<br />

880 David Brickner, ‘Don’t Pass Over Israel’s Jubilee,’ Jews for Jesus <strong>New</strong>sletter, April<br />

(1998).<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!