29.08.2015 Views

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

Christian Zionism - New Life Tabernacle of Chattanooga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(4) Restoration to the land, v.5 (Isa. 11:11; Jer. 23:3-8; Ezk. 37:21-25).<br />

(5) National conversion, v.6 (Rom. 11:26, 27; Hos. 2:14-16).<br />

(6) The judgement <strong>of</strong> Israel’s oppressors, v.7 (Isa.14:1,2;Mt. 25:31-46).<br />

(7) National prosperity, v.9 (Amos 9:11-14)’ 850<br />

Schuyler English, in the 1967 <strong>New</strong> Sc<strong>of</strong>ield Reference Bible 851 revision,<br />

consistently adds to Sc<strong>of</strong>ield’s original notes to give a more explicit<br />

dispensational reading <strong>of</strong> key texts. In many cases references to<br />

contemporary Israel are appended to verses on which Sc<strong>of</strong>ield originally<br />

made no comment at all. 852 For example, on Deuteronomy 30:5, Schuyler<br />

English adds the following innovation:<br />

‘No passage <strong>of</strong> scripture has found fuller confirmation in the events <strong>of</strong><br />

history than Dt. 28 - 30. In AD 70 the Jewish nation was scattered<br />

throughout the world because <strong>of</strong> disobedience and rejection <strong>of</strong> Christ.<br />

In world-wide dispersion they experienced exactly the punishments<br />

foretold by Moses. On the other hand, when the nation walked in<br />

conformity with the will <strong>of</strong> God, it enjoyed the blessing and protection <strong>of</strong><br />

God. In the twentieth Century the exiled people were restored to their<br />

homeland.’ 853<br />

Inexplicably, Sc<strong>of</strong>ield’s original chronology in which the Lord returns before<br />

Israel is restored, which is retained by Schuyler English, is nevertheless<br />

contradicted by the final sentence he adds to the footnote. 854 No explanation<br />

is given for the apparent contradiction between Israel’s continued<br />

‘disobedience and rejection <strong>of</strong> Christ’ and yet their restoration ‘to their<br />

homeland.’<br />

Sc<strong>of</strong>ield’s claim that Israel never possessed all the land promised to<br />

Abraham, is also at variance with the books <strong>of</strong> Joshua and Nehemiah. 855 The<br />

author <strong>of</strong> Joshua insists, ‘So Joshua took the entire land, just as the Lord had<br />

directed Moses.’ (Joshua 11:23). At the end <strong>of</strong> the book <strong>of</strong> Joshua, the same<br />

assessment is repeated but more emphatically, ‘So the Lord gave Israel all<br />

the land he had sworn to give their forefathers, and they took possession <strong>of</strong> it<br />

and settled there … Not one <strong>of</strong> all the Lord’s good promises to the house <strong>of</strong><br />

Israel failed; every one was fulfilled.’ (21:43-45). It is hard to see how this<br />

850 Ibid., fn. 1, p250.<br />

851 Schuyler English, <strong>New</strong>, op.cit.,<br />

852 Ibid., p19.<br />

853 Ibid., p217.<br />

854 Ibid., p217.<br />

855 Joshua 11:23; 21:43-45; Nehemiah 9:22-23.<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!