23.10.2015 Views

Final Version May 5 07

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

266<br />

theory is just a proposed explanation of a phenomenon. To scaffold her learning she<br />

could assume a reframed image as a theorist in her own right. Stremmel (2002b) supports<br />

the notion of teacher as theorist in early childhood education as being fundamental to<br />

teacher development. Rose is representative of a teacher reaching a critical juncture in her<br />

journey where theory can become a transformative part of her practice.<br />

Felicia was able to articulate a social constructivist worldview. She referred to<br />

theory often in the process of this dissertation. Felicia believes in the importance of<br />

children’s voices and the value of the co-construction of curriculum. Teachers who are<br />

oriented toward socio-constructivism view the dialogue that occurs between and among<br />

children as an invaluable learning tool, and thus these teachers intentionally create<br />

opportunities for discussion and collaborative learning (Cadwell, 1997). Dialogue<br />

between children is a key variable in socio-constructivism. According to Cadwell (1997),<br />

children were more likely to express an authentic voice where individual response and<br />

interpretation were valued by the teacher and fellow students, and scaffolded through<br />

questioning at various levels. Of the four teachers, Felicia, while not the most<br />

experienced, was able to most clearly articulate theory.<br />

Stages of Teacher Development<br />

All four participants consider themselves to be experienced teachers. However,<br />

their stage of development according to Katz (1972) appears different even though each<br />

has surpassed the four-year mark in her teaching career. First conceptualized in 1972, this<br />

model of developmental stages of teachers has been revised a number of times. In 2005, a<br />

revised version was published which retained the original central ideas. In this new 2005<br />

version, Katz defends the original conceptualization against criticism from postmodern

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!