23.10.2015 Views

Final Version May 5 07

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

272<br />

Table 2<br />

Kashin’s Model of Emergent Curriculum<br />

Stage 1<br />

Status quo<br />

Stage 2<br />

Transitional<br />

Stage 3<br />

Implementation<br />

Description of<br />

Themes<br />

Combination of<br />

Projects or “projected<br />

practice<br />

theme and projects<br />

curriculum” (Gandini,<br />

1998, p. 113)<br />

Trajectory In the valley Climbing upwards On the mountaintop<br />

Reaction to<br />

Cognitive<br />

Acceptance or<br />

Transformation<br />

innovative<br />

dissonance<br />

rejection. (With<br />

practice<br />

acceptance, the<br />

climb continues.<br />

With rejection, a<br />

return to the valley)<br />

The experience of emergent curriculum is similar to climbing a mountain in a<br />

spiral trajectory in order to reach the peak. Periodic downward descents may occur when<br />

new information informs practice. Then a teacher must toil in the turmoil of the valley of<br />

cognitive conflict taking time to accommodate the new information which will then<br />

require climbing another peak. These teachers each spent time in the valley before<br />

ascending the mountain of emergent curriculum. In the valley, their practice was<br />

characterized by the status quo of the thematic approach to curriculum implementation.<br />

This is the time of transition where cognitive dissonance occurs. If a teacher does not<br />

move forward and make the decision to climb the mountain, she remains oblivious to the<br />

transformative experience of reaching the peak of the mountaintop.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!