25.11.2015 Views

MOTION MOUNTAIN

LIGHT, CHARGES AND BRAINS - Motion Mountain

LIGHT, CHARGES AND BRAINS - Motion Mountain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278 9 concepts, lies and patterns of nature<br />

Page 281<br />

sible.Whensaying ‘lawsgovern nature’ we actually mean to say ‘being lazy, we describe<br />

observations with patterns’. Laws are the epitome of laziness. Formulating laws is pure<br />

sloth. In fact, the correct expression is<br />

⊳ Patterns describe nature.<br />

Physicists have written about the laziness necessary to find patterns in much detail. In<br />

order to become a master of laziness, we need to distinguish lazy patterns from those<br />

which are not, such as lies, beliefs, statements that are not about observations, and statementsthatarenotabout<br />

motion.Wedothisbelow.<br />

The quest for laziness is the origin, among others, of the use of numbers in physics.<br />

Observables are often best described with the help of numbers, because numbers allow<br />

easy and precise communication and classification. Length, velocity, angles, temperature,<br />

voltage or field strength are of this type.The notion of ‘number’, used in every measurement,<br />

is constructed, often unconsciously, from the notions of ‘set’ and ‘relation’, as<br />

shownabove. Apart from the notion of number, other concepts are regularly defined to<br />

allow fast and compact communication of the ‘laws’ of nature; all are ‘abbreviation tools.’<br />

In this sense, the statement ‘the level of the Kac–Moody algebra of the Lagrangian of the<br />

heterotic superstring model is equal to one’ contains precise information, explainable<br />

to everybody; however, it would take dozens of pages to express it using only the terms<br />

‘set’ and ‘relation.’ In short, the precision common in physics results from its quest for<br />

laziness.<br />

“Esistbesser,daßdieLeute nichtwissen,wie<br />

GesetzeundWurstzustandekommen. Sonst<br />

könnten sienachtsnichtruhig schlafen.*<br />

Bismarck,Ottovon”<br />

Are physical concepts discovered or created?<br />

3”<br />

“DaslogischeBildderTatsachenistder<br />

Gedanke.**<br />

LudwigWittgenstein, Tractatus,<br />

The title question is often rephrased as: are physical concepts free of beliefs, taste or personal<br />

choices? The question has been discussed so much that it even appears in Hollywood<br />

films. We give a short summary that can help you to distinguish honest from<br />

dishonest teachers.<br />

Creation of concepts, in contrast to their discovery, would imply free choice between<br />

many alternative possibilities.The chosen alternative for the definition of concepts would<br />

then be due to the beliefs or tastes used. In physics (in obvious contrast to other, more<br />

ideological fields of enquiry), we know that different physical descriptions of observations<br />

are either equivalent or, in the opposite case, imprecise or even wrong. A physical<br />

description of observations is thus essentially unique: any choices of concepts are only<br />

apparent.There is no real freedom in the definition of physical concepts. In this property,<br />

physics is in strong contrast to artistic activity.<br />

* ‘It is better that people do not know how laws and sausages are made. Otherwise they would not sleep<br />

wellatnight.’ Otto vonBismarck(b.1815Schönhausen,d.1898Friedrichsruh) wasPrussianChancellor.<br />

** ‘Alogical picture offactsisathought.’<br />

Motion Mountain – The Adventure of Physics copyright © Christoph Schiller June 1990–November 2015 free pdf file available at www.motionmountain.net

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!