25.11.2015 Views

MOTION MOUNTAIN

LIGHT, CHARGES AND BRAINS - Motion Mountain

LIGHT, CHARGES AND BRAINS - Motion Mountain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

concepts, lies and patterns of nature 285<br />

general statements are often daring and fragile whereas general lies are usually boring<br />

and violent. The truth is fragile. True statements require the author to stick his neck out<br />

to criticism. Researchers know that if one doesn’t stick the neck out, it can’t be an observation<br />

or a theory. (A theory is another name for one or several connected, not yet<br />

falsified universal statements about observations.)* Telling the truth does make vulnerable.<br />

For this reason, theories are often daring, arrogant or provoking; at the same time<br />

theyhave to be fragile andvulnerable. For many men, theories thus resemble what they<br />

think about women. Darwin’sThe originofspecies illustrates the stark contrast between<br />

the numerous boring and solid facts that Darwin collected and the daring theory that he<br />

deduced. Boredom of facts is a sign of truth.<br />

In contrast, the witch-hunters propagating ‘creationism’ or so-called ‘intelligent<br />

design’ are examples of liars. The specific lies they propagate, such as ‘the world was<br />

createdin October4004 bce’,are sensational, whereasthegeneral lies theypropagate,<br />

suchas ‘therehave not been big changes in the past’, are boring. This is in full contrast<br />

with common sense. Moreover, lies, in contrast to true statements, make people violent.<br />

The worse the lie, the more violent the people. This connection can be observed regularlyinthenews.Inotherwords,<br />

‘creationism’ and ‘intelligent design’ arenotonlylies,<br />

theyarebadlies.A ‘good’ generallie,likeagoodphysicaltheory,seemscrazyandseems<br />

vulnerable, such as ‘people have free will’. A ‘good’ specific lie is boring, such as ‘this<br />

looks like bread, but for the next ten minutes it is not’. Good lies do not induce violence.<br />

Feelings can thus be a criterion to judge the quality of lies, if we pay careful attention to<br />

the type of statement. A number of common lies are discussed later in this chapter.<br />

An important aspect of any ‘good’ lie is to make as fewpublic statements as possible,<br />

so that critics can check as little as possible. (For anybody sending corrections of mistakes<br />

in thistext, I provide a small reward.) To detect lies, public scrutiny is important,<br />

though not always reliable. Sometimes, even scientists make statements which are not<br />

based on observations. However, a ‘good’ lie is always well prepared and told on purpose;<br />

accidental lies are frowned upon by experts. Examples of good lies in science are<br />

‘aether’, ‘UFOs’, ‘creation science’,or ‘cold fusion’.Sometimesittookmanydecades to<br />

detecttheliesinthesedomains.<br />

Tosumup,thecentralpointsoftheartoflyingwithoutbeingcaughtaretwo:donot<br />

divulge details, and allow some select group to earn money with your lies. Bevague. All<br />

the methods used to verify a statement ask for details, for precision. For any statement,<br />

its degree of precision allows one to gauge the degree to which the author is sticking<br />

his neck out. The more precision that is demanded, the weaker a statement becomes,<br />

and the more likely a fault will be found, if there is one. This is the main reason that<br />

* In other words, a set of not yet falsified patterns of observations on the same topic is called a (physical)<br />

theory.Theterm ‘theory’ will alwaysbeusedinthissenseinthiswalk,i.e.,withthemeaning ‘setofcorrect<br />

generalstatements’.ThisuseresultsfromitsGreekorigin: ‘theoria’ means ‘observation’;itsoriginalmeaning,‘passionateandemphaticcontemplation’,summarizesthewholeofphysicsinasingleword.(‘Theory’,<br />

like ‘theatre’, is formed from the root θέ, meaning ‘the act of contemplating’.) Sometimes, however, the<br />

term ‘theory’ is used – being confused with ‘hypothesis’ – with the meaning of ‘conjecture’, as in ‘your<br />

theory is wrong’, sometimes with the meaning of ‘model’, as in ‘Chern–Simons’ theory and sometimes<br />

with the meaning of ‘standard procedure’, as in ‘perturbation theory’. These incorrect uses are avoided<br />

here.Tobring theissuetoapoint:thetheoryofevolutionisnotaconjecture,butasetofcorrectstatements<br />

basedonobservation.<br />

Motion Mountain – The Adventure of Physics copyright © Christoph Schiller June 1990–November 2015 free pdf file available at www.motionmountain.net

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!