07.04.2016 Views

Scriptures selfattesting authority question doctrine truthfulness Scriptures

peculiar-glory-en

peculiar-glory-en

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282 Conclusion<br />

An Understandable Obstacle<br />

For some of you, this claim presents an enormous obstacle. You may<br />

belong to another religion with its own sacred scriptures. You may have<br />

no religion. Or you may have your hands in many spiritual pots, attempting<br />

to find the most inspiring and helpful parts from all of them.<br />

In all these cases, the totality of the claim that the Christian <strong>Scriptures</strong><br />

lay on you may feel out of the <strong>question</strong>.<br />

You may feel that the only things such a total claim can breed are<br />

intolerance, and then hate, and then violence. You may point to religiously<br />

motivated terror in our day or to historical violence in the name<br />

of Christianity. An answer to that concern is worthy of an entire book.<br />

But short of that, I would briefly ask you to consider another angle.<br />

Does reason and history show that totalitarian abuses of ethnic and<br />

religious minorities are avoided by the avoidance of religious absolutes?<br />

The great horrors of the twentieth century were not perpetrated by<br />

lovers of God—six million Jews murdered in Germany, and sixty million<br />

people killed or starved under the Soviet regime, and forty million<br />

destroyed under the Chinese Cultural Revolution of Mao Zedong, and<br />

over a million purged in the Communist Killing Fields of Cambodia.<br />

These atrocities were pursued by those who considered biblical religion<br />

(and all other religions that give allegiance to God over the state) to be a<br />

threat. In other words, the solution to the historic problem of religious<br />

violence is not irreligion. We have tasted the horrors of those who exalt<br />

themselves above the absolutes of religion.<br />

Is it not obvious (or at least, very likely) that where God is rejected<br />

as an <strong>authority</strong> over us, we tend to put ourselves in that <strong>authority</strong>?<br />

And if we are our own supreme <strong>authority</strong>, there is no way for us to be<br />

checked in what we justify. This is what happened with Hitler, Stalin,<br />

Mao, and Pol Pot. There was no one above them—no God and therefore<br />

no law—that they would be accountable to.<br />

Which leads to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that we need a<br />

worldview that contains truth that has higher <strong>authority</strong> than ourselves<br />

and that prohibits the coercion of others who do not share that worldview.<br />

Let me say the paradox again: violence against ethnic and religious<br />

minorities is best prevented by holding to a faith in the absolute claims<br />

of the biblical God, because his truth not only limits our self-exaltation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!