07.04.2016 Views

Scriptures selfattesting authority question doctrine truthfulness Scriptures

peculiar-glory-en

peculiar-glory-en

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Which Books Make Up the New Testament? 67<br />

our New Testament grew organically out of the appearance of a new<br />

<strong>authority</strong> in the world. 7 Jesus Christ was not merely a final or a great<br />

prophet. He was the presence of God in the flesh. Therefore, he confirmed<br />

and fulfilled and stood above the <strong>authority</strong> of the Old Testament.<br />

Accordingly his own <strong>authority</strong> would extend over the new people of<br />

God that he was calling into being.<br />

He planned for this and sent his Spirit to make sure that the apostles<br />

would be led into all truth. They would speak with his <strong>authority</strong> by<br />

the Spirit, and they would glorify him. The manifestation of this glory<br />

through the inspired, apostolic writings would confirm to the early<br />

church—as it continues to do for God’s people today—that these writings<br />

are the word of God.<br />

It was inevitable that in addressing the <strong>question</strong> Which books make<br />

up the New Testament? we would pass over into the <strong>question</strong> How do<br />

we know these books are the word of God? So, in a sense, we have<br />

gotten ahead of ourselves. That <strong>question</strong> will be answered more fully<br />

in chapters 8–17. So if the pointers feel tantalizing now, let that be<br />

encouraging rather than frustrating. The fuller explanation is coming.<br />

For now, it was necessary to point out that the spiritual forces at work<br />

in confirming the New Testament canon to the church were the same<br />

spiritual forces that are at work in confirming the <strong>Scriptures</strong> to Christians<br />

today.<br />

There are two more steps to take before we can focus fully on how<br />

we know these books are God’s word. First, in the next chapter, we need<br />

to ask the <strong>question</strong> Do we have the very words that the New Testament<br />

writers wrote—have they been preserved faithfully for us? Second, we<br />

will need to ask, in chapters 5–7, what, in fact, the <strong>Scriptures</strong> claim for<br />

themselves.<br />

7<br />

Of course, the very idea of a limited canon of twenty-seven books implies that there were contenders for<br />

inclusion that did not make the cut. These are of many kinds. A quick overview can be found at http://​en​<br />

.wikipedia​.org​/wiki​/New​_Testament​_apocrypha. One way to think about the major contenders is to use<br />

the categories provided by Eusebius, a church historian who died about AD 340 (Ecclesiastical History,<br />

3.25.1–7). When he gave his list of books that the church took seriously, they fell into four categories:<br />

(1) recognized books, (2) disputed books, (3) rejected books (e.g., Apocalypse of Peter, Epistle of Barnabas,<br />

Didache, Gospel of Hebrews), and (4) heretical books (e.g., Gospel of Peter, Gospel of Thomas, Gospel<br />

of Matthias, Acts of Andrew, Acts of John). One helpful discussion of these is found in Kruger, Canon<br />

Revisited, 266–87.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!