04.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Fifth Fascicle

Various aspects of Hanafi Fiqh are explained, e.g., zakat, ramadan, hajj, sadaqa-i fitr, Qurban(sacrifice), Iyd(Eid), nikah(marriage), death, janaza, burial, visiting graves, condolence, isqat and knowledge of faraid.

Various aspects of Hanafi Fiqh are explained, e.g., zakat, ramadan, hajj, sadaqa-i fitr, Qurban(sacrifice), Iyd(Eid), nikah(marriage), death, janaza, burial, visiting graves, condolence, isqat and knowledge of faraid.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

zakât to the poor or to a deputy in gold and then to convert it into<br />

paper money, is called Hîla-i shar’iyya. This technique, which is<br />

inevitably applied for the purpose of paying zakât compatibly with<br />

Islam’s prescription, yields much thawâb. The twenty-first and<br />

fortieth chapters of the current fascicle inform us that it is<br />

permissible to do hîla-i shar’iyya, and for the poor person to give<br />

back (as a gift) the money. However, after zakât becomes fard, it<br />

becomes harâm to practise this technique if it is intended to avoid<br />

giving zakât; it is considered a fraud (Hîla-i-bâtila). To employ the<br />

technique called hîla before zakât becomes fard is makrûh<br />

according to Imâm Muhammad, whereas it is jâiz (permissible)<br />

according to Imâm Abû Yûsuf. Please see the final part of the<br />

fortieth chapter.<br />

The two hundred and seventy-fifth âyat of Sûra Baqara<br />

purports: “Allah destroys completely the income and property<br />

earned through usury. He lets none of it remain. But He increases<br />

the property for which zakât is paid.” People who do not know or<br />

believe this promise of Allâhu ta’âlâ’s, try to avoid paying zakât.<br />

Some people resort to hîla-i bâtila in order not to pay the poor and<br />

the government their due. One of the hîla-i-bâtilas they have been<br />

practising recently is converting their cash into landed property,<br />

such as a house or a store or an urban or rural land plot, in order<br />

to avoid attaining the nisâb of zakât, and then renting out their<br />

purchases. This trickery absolves them from the obligation of<br />

paying zakât, only to entangle them with another obligation, the<br />

obligation of supporting their poor relatives. And this second<br />

situation, in its turn, is something they are quite unaware of.<br />

Consequently, they not only neglect the fard of paying nafaqa to<br />

their poor relatives, but also deprive themselves of the thawâb<br />

(that Allâhu ta’âlâ promises) for Sila–i-rahm (visiting one’s<br />

relatives). In addition, they confine to heaps of stone and earth the<br />

money that could otherwise be utilized in trade, industry, and for<br />

the country’s economic development. It goes without saying that in<br />

consequence they remain forever deprived of the abundance and<br />

wealth that Allâhu ta’âlâ promises to the givers of zakât.<br />

While discoursing about the kinds of oath, Ibni ’Âbidîn,<br />

Mawqûfât and the authors of many other books ‘rahmatullâhi<br />

’alaihim ajma’în’, write that “If a person swears: I shall pay today so<br />

much silver which I owe to so and so, and if he in lieu gives zuyûf, [1]<br />

or silver more than half of which is copper, he will have fulfilled his<br />

[1] Please see the ninth paragraph of the twenty-ninth chapter.<br />

– 28 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!