FIRST STEPS TOWARD SPACE - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
FIRST STEPS TOWARD SPACE - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
FIRST STEPS TOWARD SPACE - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NUMBER 10 63<br />
FIGURE 5.—Modification of rocket design in, now classic, configuration:<br />
motor at rear, surmounted by liquid oxygen and<br />
gasoline propellant tanks. Rocket is on exhibit at <strong>Smithsonian</strong><br />
<strong>Institution</strong>.<br />
although a thrust of more than 200 pounds was<br />
obtained, the injector head burned through. 49<br />
To reduce costs and construction effort Goddard<br />
now turned to a medium-sized rocket design of<br />
thrust equivalent to about 40 pounds. Components<br />
were simply designed and easily replaced. Test work<br />
on rockets of this general size continued for nearly<br />
three years. Two more flights were achieved on<br />
26 December 1928 50 and 17 July 1929. 51 On the<br />
latter flight a thermometer and barometer, together<br />
with a camera to record data at zenith were carried<br />
as payload. 52<br />
All these flights were conducted on a farm at<br />
nearby Auburn, Massachusetts. Because the loud<br />
noise resulted in unwelcome publicity 53 and<br />
alarmed local authorities, 54 test work was shifted to<br />
the U. S. Army artillery range at Camp Devens,<br />
Massachusetts. 55 Once again the <strong>Smithsonian</strong> paved<br />
the way with letters to the Army that secured the<br />
necessary permission. 50<br />
At this point substantial financial support became<br />
available from Daniel Guggenheim, a wealthy and<br />
philanthropic New Yorker who had been supporting<br />
development of aeronautics at the request of<br />
his son Harry F. Guggenheim. Colonel Charles A.<br />
Lindbergh had personally visited Goddard in November<br />
1929 and had been impressed by potential<br />
developments of rocket power. 57 At Lindbergh's<br />
suggestion, 58 Guggenheim agreed to sponsor Goddard's<br />
efforts. 59 Officials of the DuPont Company<br />
served as additional technical advisors to Guggenheim.<br />
Meanwhile, the Carnegie <strong>Institution</strong> in Washington<br />
in December 1929 advanced $5,000 to the<br />
<strong>Smithsonian</strong> for Goddard's continuing research. 60<br />
With the Guggenheim support, Goddard was<br />
able to increase significantly the size and scope of<br />
his work. 01 Moving to Mescalero Ranch at Roswell,<br />
New Mexico, 61 privacy and adequate supporting<br />
facilities permitted him to devote full effort to<br />
developing the many elements of sounding-rocket<br />
design which he had conceived. Such items included<br />
gyro stabilization, steering-jet vanes in the rocket<br />
exhaust as well as aerodynamic flaps, gas generators<br />
and turbopumps for propellants, improved injector<br />
heads, film cooling of combustion chambers, valving,<br />
igniters, launch controls, and parachute recovery.<br />
62 Goddard recognized that although Abbot<br />
would continue as a member of the Guggenheim<br />
advisory committee his work would no longer<br />
be under the direct support of the <strong>Smithsonian</strong><br />
<strong>Institution</strong>. To Abbot he wrote:<br />
I am deeply appreciative of the support of the <strong>Smithsonian</strong><br />
has given this rocket work, from its start as a bare idea with<br />
little experimental verification, in 1917. I am so particularly<br />
grateful for your interest, encouragement, and far-sightedness.<br />
I feel that I cannot overestimate the value of your backing,<br />
at times when hardly anyone else in the world could see<br />
anything of importance in the undertaking.63<br />
As it turned out, however, Abbot continued his<br />
close and friendly relationship until Goddard's<br />
untimely death on 10 August 1945. For example,<br />
when Goddard's basic 1914 patents were about to<br />
expire in 1931, 01 Abbot obtained sponsorship for<br />
a special bill in Congress. 65 Military support of<br />
such a bill was necessary. However, the Army<br />
Ordnance Corps declared that "no immediate or<br />
near future use of rockets for ordnance purposes<br />
seems probable." 6G The Navy, just as shortsightedly,<br />
declared that if rocket development were<br />
more public greater progress in national defense