06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 6D Linear Functionals 179<br />

Because our simplified form of Zorn’s Lemma deals with set inclusions rather<br />

than more general orderings, we need to use the notion of the graph of a function.<br />

6.67 Definition graph<br />

Suppose T : V → W is a function from a set V to a set W. Then the graph of T<br />

is denoted graph(T) and is the subset of V × W defined by<br />

graph(T) ={ ( f , T( f ) ) ∈ V × W : f ∈ V}.<br />

Formally, a function from a set V to a set W equals its graph as defined above.<br />

However, because we usually think of a function more intuitively as a mapping, the<br />

separate notion of the graph of a function remains useful.<br />

The easy proof of the next result is left to the reader. The first bullet point<br />

below uses the vector space structure of V × W, which is a vector space with natural<br />

operations of addition and scalar multiplication, as given in Exercise 10 in Section 6B.<br />

6.68 function properties in terms of graphs<br />

Suppose V and W are normed vector spaces and T : V → W is a function.<br />

(a) T is a linear map if and only if graph(T) is a subspace of V × W.<br />

(b) Suppose U ⊂ V and S : U → W is a function. Then T is an extension of S<br />

if and only if graph(S) ⊂ graph(T).<br />

(c) If T : V → W is a linear map and c ∈ [0, ∞), then ‖T‖ ≤c if and only if<br />

‖g‖ ≤c‖ f ‖ for all ( f , g) ∈ graph(T).<br />

The proof of the Extension Lemma<br />

(6.63) used inequalities that do not make<br />

sense when F = C. Thus the proof of the<br />

Hahn–Banach Theorem below requires<br />

some extra steps when F = C.<br />

Hans Hahn (1879–1934) was a<br />

student and later a faculty member<br />

at the University of Vienna, where<br />

one of his PhD students was Kurt<br />

Gödel (1906–1978).<br />

6.69 Hahn–Banach Theorem<br />

Suppose V is a normed vector space, U is a subspace of V, and ψ : U → F is a<br />

bounded linear functional. Then ψ can be extended to a bounded linear functional<br />

on V whose norm equals ‖ψ‖.<br />

Proof First we consider the case where F = R. Let A be the collection of subsets<br />

E of V × R that satisfy all the following conditions:<br />

• E = graph(ϕ) for some linear functional ϕ on some subspace of V;<br />

• graph(ψ) ⊂ E;<br />

• |α| ≤‖ψ‖‖f ‖ for every ( f , α) ∈ E.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!