06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250 Chapter 8 Hilbert Spaces<br />

Riesz Representation Theorem, Revisited<br />

Now that we know that every Hilbert space has an orthonormal basis, we can give a<br />

completely different proof of the Riesz Representation Theorem (8.47) than the proof<br />

we gave earlier.<br />

Note that the new proof below of the Riesz Representation Theorem gives the<br />

formula 8.77 for h in terms of an orthonormal basis. One interesting feature of this<br />

formula is that h is uniquely determined by ϕ and thus h does not depend upon the<br />

choice of an orthonormal basis. Hence despite its appearance, the right side of 8.77<br />

is independent of the choice of an orthonormal basis.<br />

8.76 Riesz Representation Theorem<br />

Suppose ϕ is a bounded linear functional on a Hilbert space V and {e k } k∈Γ is an<br />

orthonormal basis of V. Let<br />

8.77 h = ∑ ϕ(e k )e k .<br />

k∈Γ<br />

Then<br />

8.78 ϕ( f )=〈 f , h〉<br />

for all f ∈ V. Furthermore, ‖ϕ‖ = ( ∑ k∈Γ |ϕ(e k )| 2) 1/2 .<br />

Proof First we must show that the sum defining h makes sense. To do this, suppose<br />

Ω is a finite subset of Γ. Then<br />

) ∥ (<br />

∑ |ϕ(e j )| 2 ∥∥<br />

= ϕ(<br />

∑ ϕ(e j )e j ≤‖ϕ‖ ∥ ∑ ϕ(e j )e j = ‖ϕ‖ ∑ |ϕ(e j )| 2) 1/2<br />

,<br />

j∈Ω<br />

j∈Ω<br />

j∈Ω<br />

j∈Ω<br />

(<br />

where the last equality follows from 8.52. Dividing by ∑ j∈Ω |ϕ(e j )| 2) 1/2<br />

gives<br />

(<br />

∑ |ϕ(e j )| 2) 1/2<br />

≤‖ϕ‖.<br />

j∈Ω<br />

Because the inequality above holds for every finite subset Ω of Γ, we conclude that<br />

∑ |ϕ(e k )| 2 ≤‖ϕ‖ 2 .<br />

k∈Γ<br />

Thus the sum defining h makes sense (by 8.54) in equation 8.77.<br />

Now 8.77 shows that 〈h, e j 〉 = ϕ(e j ) for each j ∈ Γ. Thus if f ∈ V then<br />

( )<br />

ϕ( f )=ϕ ∑ f , e k 〉e k<br />

k∈Γ〈<br />

= ∑<br />

k∈Γ<br />

〈 f , e k 〉ϕ(e k )=∑ 〈 f , e k 〉〈h, e k 〉 = 〈 f , h〉,<br />

where the first and last equalities follow from 8.63 and the second equality follows<br />

from the boundedness/continuity of ϕ. Thus 8.78 holds.<br />

Finally, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, equation 8.78, and the equation ϕ(h) =<br />

〈h, h〉 show that ‖ϕ‖ = ‖h‖ = ( ∑ k∈Γ |ϕ(e k )| 2) 1/2 .<br />

k∈Γ<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!