06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 10B Spectrum 307<br />

The equivalence between (a) and (c) in the previous result shows that every unitary<br />

operator is an isometry.<br />

Next we have a result giving conditions that are equivalent to being a unitary<br />

operator. Notice that parts (d) and (e) of the previous result refer to orthonormal<br />

families, but parts (f) and (g) of the following result refer to orthonormal bases.<br />

10.61 unitary operators and their adjoints are isometries<br />

Suppose T is a bounded operator on a Hilbert space V. Then the following are<br />

equivalent:<br />

(a) T is unitary.<br />

(b) T is a surjective isometry.<br />

(c) T and T ∗ are both isometries.<br />

(d) T ∗ is unitary.<br />

(e) T is invertible and T −1 = T ∗ .<br />

(f)<br />

{Te k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal basis of V for every orthonormal basis {e k } k∈Γ<br />

of V.<br />

(g) {Te k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal basis of V for some orthonormal basis {e k } k∈Γ<br />

of V.<br />

Proof The equivalence of (a), (d), and (e) follows easily from the definition of<br />

unitary.<br />

The equivalence of (a) and (c) follows from the equivalence in 10.60 of (a) and (c).<br />

To prove that (a) implies (b), suppose (a) holds, so T is unitary. As we have<br />

already noted, this implies that T is an isometry. Also, the equation TT ∗ = I implies<br />

that T is surjective. Thus (b) holds, proving that (a) implies (b).<br />

Now suppose (b) holds, so T is a surjective isometry. Because T is surjective and<br />

injective, T is invertible. The equation T ∗ T = I [which follows from the equivalence<br />

in 10.60 of (a) and (c)] now implies that T −1 = T ∗ . Thus (b) implies (e). Hence at<br />

this stage of the proof, we know that (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) are all equivalent to<br />

each other.<br />

To prove that (b) implies (f), suppose (b) holds, so T is a surjective isometry.<br />

Suppose {e k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal basis of V. The equivalence in 10.60 of (a) and (d)<br />

implies that {Te k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal family. Because {e k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal<br />

basis of V and T is surjective, the closure of the span of {Te k } k∈Γ equals V. Thus<br />

{Te k } k∈Γ is an orthonormal basis of V, which proves that (b) implies (f).<br />

Obviously (f) implies (g).<br />

Now suppose (g) holds. The equivalence in 10.60 of (a) and (e) implies that T<br />

is an isometry, which implies that the range of T is closed. Because {Te k } k∈Γ is an<br />

orthonormal basis of V, the closure of the range of T equals V. Thus T is a surjective<br />

isometry, proving that (g) implies (b) and completing the proof that (a) through (g)<br />

are all equivalent to each other.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!