06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 Chapter 2 <strong>Measure</strong>s<br />

EXERCISES 2D<br />

1 (a) Show that the set consisting of those numbers in (0, 1) that have a decimal<br />

expansion containing one hundred consecutive 4s is a Borel subset of R.<br />

(b) What is the Lebesgue measure of the set in part (a)?<br />

2 Prove that there exists a bounded set A ⊂ R such that |F| ≤|A|−1 for every<br />

closed set F ⊂ A.<br />

3 Prove that there exists a set A ⊂ R such that |G \ A| = ∞ for every open set G<br />

that contains A.<br />

4 The phrase nontrivial interval is used to denote an interval of R that contains<br />

more than one element. Recall that an interval might be open, closed, or neither.<br />

(a) Prove that the union of each collection of nontrivial intervals of R is the<br />

union of a countable subset of that collection.<br />

(b) Prove that the union of each collection of nontrivial intervals of R is a Borel<br />

set.<br />

(c) Prove that there exists a collection of closed intervals of R whose union is<br />

not a Borel set.<br />

5 Prove that if A ⊂ R is Lebesgue measurable, then there exists an increasing<br />

sequence F 1 ⊂ F 2 ⊂··· of closed sets contained in A such that<br />

∣<br />

∣A \<br />

∞⋃<br />

k=1<br />

F k<br />

∣ ∣∣ = 0.<br />

6 Suppose A ⊂ R and |A| < ∞. Prove that A is Lebesgue measurable if and<br />

only if for every ε > 0 there exists a set G that is the union of finitely many<br />

disjoint bounded open intervals such that |A \ G| + |G \ A| < ε.<br />

7 Prove that if A ⊂ R is Lebesgue measurable, then there exists a decreasing<br />

sequence G 1 ⊃ G 2 ⊃··· of open sets containing A such that<br />

( ⋂ ∞ ) ∣ G k \ A∣ = 0.<br />

k=1<br />

8 Prove that the collection of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R is translation<br />

invariant. More precisely, prove that if A ⊂ R is Lebesgue measurable and<br />

t ∈ R, then t + A is Lebesgue measurable.<br />

9 Prove that the collection of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R is dilation invariant.<br />

More precisely, prove that if A ⊂ R is Lebesgue measurable and t ∈ R,<br />

then tA (which is defined to be {ta : a ∈ A}) is Lebesgue measurable.<br />

10 Prove that if A and B are disjoint subsets of R and B is Lebesgue measurable,<br />

then |A ∪ B| = |A| + |B|.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!