06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 10B Spectrum 297<br />

A major result in finite-dimensional<br />

linear algebra states that every operator<br />

on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex<br />

vector space has an eigenvalue. We have<br />

seen examples showing that this result<br />

does not extend to bounded operators on<br />

complex Hilbert spaces. However, the<br />

next result is an excellent substitute. Although<br />

a bounded operator on a nonzero<br />

The spectrum of a bounded operator<br />

on a nonzero real Hilbert space can<br />

be the empty set. This can happen<br />

even in finite dimensions, where an<br />

operator on R 2 might have no<br />

eigenvalues. Thus the restriction in<br />

the next result to the complex case<br />

cannot be removed.<br />

complex Hilbert space need not have an eigenvalue, the next result shows that for<br />

each such operator T, there exists α ∈ C such that T − αI is not invertible.<br />

10.38 spectrum is nonempty<br />

The spectrum of a bounded operator on a complex nonzero Hilbert space is a<br />

nonempty subset of C.<br />

Proof Suppose T ∈B(V), where V is a complex Hilbert space with V ̸= {0}, and<br />

sp(T) =∅. Let f ∈ V with f ̸= 0. Take g = T −1 f in 10.37. Because sp(T) =∅,<br />

10.37 implies that the function<br />

α ↦→ 〈 (T − αI) −1 f , T −1 f 〉<br />

is analytic on all of C. The value of the function above at α = 0 equals the average<br />

value of the function on each circle in C centered at 0 (because analytic functions<br />

satisfy the mean value property). But 10.34(c) implies that this function has limit 0<br />

as |α| →∞. Thus taking the average over large circles, we see that the value of the<br />

function above at α = 0 is 0. In other words,<br />

〈<br />

T −1 f , T −1 f 〉 = 0.<br />

Hence T −1 f = 0. Applying T to both sides of the equation T −1 f = 0 shows that<br />

f = 0, which contradicts our assumption that f ̸= 0. This contradiction means that<br />

our assumption that sp(T) =∅ was false, completing the proof.<br />

10.39 Definition p(T)<br />

Suppose T is an operator on a vector space V and p is a polynomial with coefficients<br />

in F:<br />

p(z) =b 0 + b 1 z + ···+ b n z n .<br />

Then p(T) is the operator on V defined by<br />

p(T) =b 0 I + b 1 T + ···+ b n T n .<br />

You should verify that if p and q are polynomials with coefficients in F and T is<br />

an operator, then<br />

(pq)(T) =p(T) q(T).<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!