06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 10A Adjoints and Invertibility 291<br />

Now suppose (c) holds, so T is injective and has closed range. We want to prove<br />

that (a) holds. Let R : range T → V be the inverse of the one-to-one linear function<br />

f ↦→ Tf that maps V onto range T. Because range T is a closed subspace of V and<br />

thus is a Banach space [by 6.16(b)], the Bounded Inverse Theorem (6.83) implies<br />

that R is a bounded linear map. Let P denote the orthogonal projection of V onto the<br />

closed subspace range T. Define S : V → V by<br />

Then for each g ∈ V,wehave<br />

Sg = R(Pg).<br />

‖Sg‖ = ‖R(Pg)‖ ≤‖R‖‖Pg‖ ≤‖R‖‖g‖,<br />

where the last inequality comes from 8.37(d). The inequality above implies that S is<br />

a bounded operator on V. Iff ∈ V, then<br />

S(Tf)=R ( P(Tf) ) = R(Tf)= f .<br />

Thus ST = I, which means that T is left invertible, completing the proof that (c)<br />

implies (a).<br />

At this stage of the proof we know that (a), (b), and (c) are equivalent. To prove<br />

that one of these implies (d), suppose (b) holds. Squaring the inequality in (b), we<br />

see that if f ∈ V, then<br />

‖ f ‖ 2 ≤ α 2 ‖Tf‖ 2 = α 2 〈T ∗ Tf, f 〉≤α 2 ‖T ∗ Tf‖‖f ‖,<br />

which implies that<br />

‖ f ‖≤α 2 ‖T ∗ Tf‖.<br />

In other words, (b) holds with T replaced by T ∗ T (and α replaced by α 2 ). By the<br />

equivalence we already proved between (a) and (b), we conclude that T ∗ T is left<br />

invertible. Thus there exists S ∈B(V) such that S(T ∗ T)=I. Taking adjoints of<br />

both sides of the last equation shows that (T ∗ T)S ∗ = I. Thus T ∗ T is also right<br />

invertible, which implies that T ∗ T is invertible. Thus (b) implies (d).<br />

Finally, suppose (d) holds, so T ∗ T is invertible. Hence there exists S ∈B(V)<br />

such that I = S(T ∗ T)=(ST ∗ )T. Thus T is left invertible, showing that (d) implies<br />

(a), completing the proof that (a), (b), (c), and (d) are equivalent.<br />

You may be familiar with the finite-dimensional result that right invertibility is<br />

equivalent to surjectivity. The next result shows that this equivalency also holds on<br />

infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.<br />

10.31 right invertibility<br />

Suppose V is a Hilbert space and T ∈B(V). Then the following are equivalent:<br />

(a) T is right invertible.<br />

(b) T is surjective.<br />

(c) TT ∗ is invertible.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!