06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 9B Decomposition Theorems 273<br />

Similarly, if f equals the characteristic function of {x ∈ X : g(x) < 0}, then the<br />

left side of 9.39 is greater than or equal to 0 and the right side of 9.39 is less than<br />

or equal to 0; hence both sides are 0. Thus ∫ fgdμ = 0, which implies (with this<br />

choice of f ) that μ({x ∈ X : g(x) < 0}) =0.<br />

Because ν ≪ μ, the two previous paragraphs imply that<br />

ν({x ∈ X : g(x) ≥ 1}) =0 and ν({x ∈ X : g(x) < 0}) =0.<br />

Thus we can modify g (for example by redefining g to be 1 2<br />

on the two sets appearing<br />

above; both those sets have ν-measure 0 and μ-measure 0) and from now on we can<br />

assume that 0 ≤ g(x) < 1 for all x ∈ X and that 9.39 holds for all f ∈L 2 (ν + μ).<br />

Hence we can define h : X → [0, ∞) by<br />

h(x) =<br />

g(x)<br />

1 − g(x) .<br />

Suppose E ∈S. For each k ∈ Z + , let<br />

⎧<br />

⎨ χ (x) E<br />

if χ E (x)<br />

f k (x) =<br />

1−g(x) 1−g(x) ≤ k,<br />

⎩<br />

0 otherwise.<br />

Then f k ∈L 2 (ν + μ). Now9.39 implies<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

f k (1 − g) dν =<br />

Taking f = χ E<br />

/(1 − g) in 9.39<br />

would give ν(E) = ∫ E<br />

h dμ, but this<br />

function f might not be in<br />

L 2 (ν + μ) and thus we need to be a<br />

bit more careful.<br />

f k g dμ.<br />

Taking the limit as k → ∞ and using the Monotone Convergence Theorem (3.11)<br />

shows that<br />

∫ ∫<br />

9.40<br />

1 dν = h dμ.<br />

E<br />

Thus dν = h dμ, completing the proof in the case where both ν and μ are (positive)<br />

finite measures [note that h ∈L 1 (μ) because h is a nonnegative function and we can<br />

take E = X in the equation above].<br />

Now relax the assumption on μ to the hypothesis that μ is a σ-finite measure.<br />

Thus there exists an increasing sequence X 1 ⊂ X 2 ⊂···of sets in S such that<br />

⋃ ∞k=1<br />

X k = X and μ(X k ) < ∞ for each k ∈ Z + .Fork ∈ Z + , let ν k and μ k denote<br />

the restrictions of ν and μ to the σ-algebra on X k consisting of those sets in S that<br />

are subsets of X k . Then ν k ≪ μ k . Thus by the case we have already proved, there<br />

exists a nonnegative function h k ∈L 1 (μ k ) such that dν k = h k dμ k .Ifj < k, then<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

h j dμ = ν(E) = h k dμ<br />

E<br />

for every set E ∈Swith E ⊂ X j ; thus μ({x ∈ X j : h j (x) ̸= h k (x)}) =0. Hence<br />

there exists an S-measurable function h : X → [0, ∞) such that<br />

μ ( {x ∈ X k : h(x) ̸= h k (x)} ) = 0<br />

for every k ∈ Z + . The Monotone Convergence Theorem (3.11) can now be used to<br />

show that 9.40 holds for every E ∈S. Thus dν = h dμ, completing the proof in the<br />

case where ν is a (positive) finite measure.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler<br />

E<br />

E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!