06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 10A Adjoints and Invertibility 281<br />

10A<br />

Adjoints and Invertibility<br />

Adjoints of Linear Maps on Hilbert Spaces<br />

The next definition provides a key tool for studying linear maps on Hilbert spaces.<br />

10.1 Definition adjoint; T ∗<br />

Suppose V and W are Hilbert spaces and T : V → W is a bounded linear map.<br />

The adjoint of T is the function T ∗ : W → V such that<br />

for every f ∈ V and every g ∈ W.<br />

〈Tf, g〉 = 〈 f , T ∗ g〉<br />

To see why the definition above makes<br />

sense, fix g ∈ W. Consider the linear<br />

functional on V defined by f ↦→ 〈Tf, g〉.<br />

This linear functional is bounded because<br />

The word adjoint has two unrelated<br />

meanings in linear algebra. We need<br />

only the meaning defined above.<br />

|〈Tf, g〉|≤‖Tf‖‖g‖ ≤‖T‖‖g‖‖f ‖<br />

for all f ∈ V; thus the linear functional f ↦→ 〈Tf, g〉 has norm at most ‖T‖‖g‖. By<br />

the Riesz Representation Theorem (8.47), there exists a unique element of V (with<br />

norm at most ‖T‖‖g‖) such that this linear functional is given by taking the inner<br />

product with it. We call this unique element T ∗ g. In other words, T ∗ g is the unique<br />

element of V such that<br />

10.2 〈Tf, g〉 = 〈 f , T ∗ g〉<br />

for every f ∈ V. Furthermore,<br />

10.3 ‖T ∗ g‖≤‖T‖‖g‖.<br />

In 10.2, notice that the inner product on the left is the inner product in W and the<br />

inner product on the right is the inner product in V.<br />

10.4 Example multiplication operators<br />

Suppose (X, S, μ) is a measure space and h ∈L ∞ (μ). Define the multiplication<br />

operator M h : L 2 (μ) → L 2 (μ) by<br />

M h f = fh.<br />

Then M h is a bounded linear map and ‖M h ‖≤‖h‖ ∞ . Because<br />

∫<br />

The complex conjugates that appear<br />

〈M h f , g〉 = fhg dμ = 〈 f , M h<br />

g〉 in this example are unnecessary (but<br />

they do no harm) if F = R.<br />

for all f , g ∈ L 2 (μ),wehaveM ∗ h = M h<br />

.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!