06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

202 Chapter 7 L p Spaces<br />

7B<br />

L p (μ)<br />

Definition of L p (μ)<br />

Suppose (X, S, μ) is a measure space and 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. If there exists a nonempty set<br />

E ∈Ssuch that μ(E) =0, then ‖χ E<br />

‖ p = 0 even though χ E ̸= 0; thus ‖·‖ p is not a<br />

norm on L p (μ). The standard way to deal with this problem is to identify functions<br />

that differ only on a set of μ-measure 0. To help make this process more rigorous, we<br />

introduce the following definitions.<br />

7.15 Definition Z(μ); ˜f<br />

Suppose (X, S, μ) is a measure space and 0 < p ≤ ∞.<br />

• Z(μ) denotes the set of S-measurable functions from X to F that equal 0<br />

almost everywhere.<br />

• For f ∈L p (μ), let ˜f be the subset of L p (μ) defined by<br />

˜f = { f + z : z ∈Z(μ)}.<br />

The set Z(μ) is clearly closed under scalar multiplication. Also, Z(μ) is closed<br />

under addition because the union of two sets with μ-measure 0 is a set with μ-<br />

measure 0. Thus Z(μ) is a subspace of L p (μ), as we had noted in the third bullet<br />

point of Example 6.32.<br />

Note that if f , F ∈L p (μ), then ˜f = ˜F if and only if f (x) =F(x) for almost<br />

every x ∈ X.<br />

7.16 Definition L p (μ)<br />

Suppose μ is a measure and 0 < p ≤ ∞.<br />

• Let L p (μ) denote the collection of subsets of L p (μ) defined by<br />

L p (μ) ={ ˜f : f ∈L p (μ)}.<br />

• For ˜f , ˜g ∈ L p (μ) and α ∈ F, define ˜f + ˜g and α ˜f by<br />

˜f + ˜g =(f + g)˜ and α ˜f =(α f )˜.<br />

The last bullet point in the definition above requires a bit of care to verify that it<br />

makes sense. The potential problem is that if Z(μ) ̸= {0}, then ˜f is not uniquely<br />

represented by f . Thus suppose f , F, g, G ∈L p (μ) and ˜f = ˜F and ˜g = ˜G. For<br />

the definition of addition in L p (μ) to make sense, we must verify that ( f + g)˜ =<br />

(F + G)˜. This verification is left to the reader, as is the similar verification that the<br />

scalar multiplication defined in the last bullet point above makes sense.<br />

You might want to think of elements of L p (μ) as equivalence classes of functions<br />

in L p (μ), where two functions are equivalent if they agree almost everywhere.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!