06.09.2021 Views

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 3A <strong>Integration</strong> with Respect to a <strong>Measure</strong> 75<br />

Suppose (X, S, μ) is a measure space and f : X → [0, ∞] is an S-measurable<br />

function. Each S-partition A 1 ,...,A m of X leads to an approximation of f from<br />

below by the S-measurable simple function ∑ m (<br />

j=1 inf f ) χ<br />

A Aj<br />

. This suggests that<br />

j<br />

m<br />

∑ μ(A j ) inf f<br />

j=1<br />

A j<br />

should be an approximation from below of our intuitive notion of ∫ f dμ. Taking the<br />

supremum of these approximations leads to our definition of ∫ f dμ.<br />

The following result gives our first example of evaluating an integral.<br />

3.4 integral of a characteristic function<br />

Suppose (X, S, μ) is a measure space and E ∈S. Then<br />

∫<br />

χ E<br />

dμ = μ(E).<br />

Proof If P is the S-partition of X consisting<br />

of E and its complement X \ E,<br />

then clearly L(χ E<br />

, P) = μ(E). Thus<br />

∫<br />

χE dμ ≥ μ(E).<br />

To prove the inequality in the other<br />

direction, suppose P is an S-partition<br />

A 1 ,...,A m of X. Then μ(A j ) inf χ<br />

A E j<br />

equals μ(A j ) if A j ⊂ E and equals 0<br />

otherwise. Thus<br />

L(χ E<br />

, P) =<br />

= μ<br />

∑<br />

{j : A j ⊂E}<br />

( ⋃<br />

≤ μ(E).<br />

{j : A j ⊂E}<br />

μ(A j )<br />

A j<br />

)<br />

The symbol d in the expression<br />

∫ f dμ has no independent meaning,<br />

but it often usefully separates f from<br />

μ. Because the d in ∫ f dμ does not<br />

represent another object, some<br />

mathematicians prefer typesetting<br />

an upright d in this situation,<br />

producing ∫ f dμ. However, the<br />

upright d looks jarring to some<br />

readers who are accustomed to<br />

italicized symbols. This book takes<br />

the compromise position of using<br />

slanted d instead of math-mode<br />

italicized d in integrals.<br />

Thus ∫ χ E<br />

dμ ≤ μ(E), completing the proof.<br />

3.5 Example integrals of χ Q<br />

and χ [0, 1] \ Q<br />

Suppose λ is Lebesgue measure on R. As a special case of the result above, we<br />

have ∫ χ Q<br />

dλ = 0 (because |Q| = 0). Recall that χ Q<br />

is not Riemann integrable on<br />

[0, 1]. Thus even at this early stage in our development of integration with respect to<br />

a measure, we have fixed one of the deficiencies of Riemann integration.<br />

Note also that 3.4 implies that ∫ χ [0, 1] \ Q<br />

dλ = 1 (because |[0, 1] \ Q| = 1),<br />

which is what we want. In contrast, the lower Riemann integral of χ [0, 1] \ Q<br />

on [0, 1]<br />

equals 0, which is not what we want.<br />

<strong>Measure</strong>, <strong>Integration</strong> & <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>, by Sheldon Axler

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!