october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4
experience do not differ notable level by gender, computer experience or internet experience. Experience
concerning the tools which science teacher candidates use in their daily lives is fairly higher than the tools they
do not use in their daily lives. Their experience level can promote by assignment and teaching activities which
require using different web 2.0 tools in their teaching experience. Mazman & Koçak Usluel (2011) state that
participants social network usage differ by gender.
Wiki, blog and other web2.0 tools are cooperative learning tools for the science classroom. Tilfarlioglu (2011)
state that Web 2.0 applications serve as a good learning tool. Hakverdi-Can & Dana (2012) state that students’
use of technology in their science classroom is highly correlated with the frequency of their science teachers’ use
of computer applications/tools. Faculty should provide example activities concerning web 2.0 tools in their class
to ensure that science teacher candidates will use these tools effectively.
REFERENCES
Aharony, N.(2009). The influence of LIS students' personality characteristics on their perceptions towards Web
2.0 use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 41. Pp: 227 - 242 . DOI:
10.1177/0961000609345088
Brown, C. &Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital
democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26. Pp: 357–369
Cain, J. & Fox, B. I. (2009). Web 2.0 and Pharmacy Education.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
73 (7) .pp: 1 – 11.
Chen, S., Yen, D. C. & Hwang, M. I. (2012). Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web
2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, In Press, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014
Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M. &Stough, L. M.(2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with
user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Education Technology Research
Development. 58. Pp: 377–398. DOI 10.1007/s11423-009-9141-x
Coutinho, C. &Mota, P. (2011). Web 2.0 Technologies in Music Education in Portugal: Using Podcasts for
Learning. Computers in the Schools.28(1).Pp: 56-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.552043
Friedla, J. &Vercic, A. T. (2011). Media preferences of digital natives’ internal communication: A pilot study.
Public Relations Review. 37. Pp: 84–86
Grosseck, G.(2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
1.Pp: 478–482
Gui, M. &Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random
sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society.13(6).Pp: 963–980.
Hakverdi-Can, M. & Dana, T. M. (2012).Exemplary Science Teachers’ Use Of Technology. TOJET: The
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – January 2012, 11(1), 94 – 112.
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S. & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct
new generation entering university?.Computers & Education. 54. Pp: 722–732
Kayri, M. & and Çakır, Ö. (2010). An Applied Study On Educational Use Of Facebook As A Web 2.0 Tool: The
Sample Lesson Of Computer Networks And Communication. International Journal Of Computer Science
& Information Technology.2(4).Pp: 48 – 58. DOI : 10.5121/ijcsit.2010.2405
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K., Bishop, A.,
Chang, R. &Churchward, A. (2007). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies:
Preliminary findings. ASCILITE Conferences 2007 Proceeding Book.Pp: 517 - 525
Kitsantas, A. &Dabbagh, N. (2011). The Role of Web 2.0 Technologies in Self-Regulated Learning. New
Directions For Teaching And Learning. 126. Pp: 99 -106. DOI: 10.1002/tl.448
Kolikant, Y. B. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their
ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior. 26. Pp: 1384–1391
Lei, J. (2009). Digital Natives As Preservice Teachers: What Technology Preparation Is Needed?.Journal of
Computing in Teacher Education.25(3).Pp: 87 - 97
Liu, X., Liu, H., Bao, Z., Ju, B. & Wang, Z. (2010). A web-based self-testing system with some features of Web
2.0: Design and primary implementation. Computers & Education, 55, 265–275.
Martin, R., Sexton, C &Franklin,T. (2009). Teaching Science for All Children: An Inquiry Approach. Fifth
Edition. Allyn And Bacon.
Mason, R. &Rennie, F. (2007). Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. Internet and Higher Education.
10. Pp:196–203
Mazman, S.G. &KoçakUsluel, Y. (2011).Gender Differences In Using Social Networks. TOJET: The Turkish
Online Journal of Educational Technology – April 2011, 10(2). 133 – 139.
MEB. (2005). Fen veTeknoloji 4 – 8 SınıflaröğretimProgramıveKlavuzu.http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr
Oliver, K. (2007). Leveraging Web 2.0 in the Redesign of a Graduate-Level Technology Integration Course.
TechTrends, 51(5). 55 – 61.
Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
146