october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon.9(5).Pp: 1 – 6. Ras, E. &Rech, J. (2009).Using Wikis to support the Net Generation in improving knowledge acquisition in capstone projects. The Journal of Systems and Software. 82. Pp: 553–562 Székely, L. & Nagy, Á. (2011). Online youth work and eYouth — A guide to the world of the digital natives. Children and Youth Services Review. 33. Pp: 2186–2197. Tilfarlioglu, F. Y. (2011). An International Dimension Of The Student’s Attitudes Towards The Use Of English In Web 2.0 Technology. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – July 2011, 10(3), 63 – 68. Valtonen, T., Dillon, P., Hacklin, S. &Vaisanen. P. (2010).Net generation at social software: Challenging assumptions, clarifying relationships and raising implications for learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 49. Pp: 210–219 Wu, S., Wang, S., Liu, E. Z., Hu, D. & Hwang, W. (2012).The Influences Of Social Self-Efficacy On Social Trust And Social Capital – A Case Study Of Facebook. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – April 2012, 11 (2), 246 – 254 Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 147
TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4 EXPLORING COLLEGE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND SELF-EFFICACY OF MOBILE LEARNING Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shih-hsien Yang National Formosa University (Department of Applied Foreign Languages), No. 64 Wen-Hua Rd. HuWei Jen, YunLin, Taiwan shiyang@nfu.edu.tw ABSTRACT Previous studies have indicated that computers and the internet play very important roles in students’ acceptance and use of new information technology. In recent years, with the rapid development of mobile technology, mobile learning (m-learning) has becoming another popular topic. However, little is known about the students’ attitudes and self-efficacy with the use of a mobile device in language learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes and self-efficacy of using mobile learning devices for college students in a language class by employing task-based instruction. The sample group of the study comprised 58 second-year students at a technical university in central Taiwan who used mobile devices for m-learning in an English class to complete assigned tasks under the guidance of the instructor. Results showed that most students agreed that their motivation for English learning was enhanced and most of them had positive attitudes towards m-learning. Implications for future research and the practice of m-learning are discussed. Keywords: computer self-efficacy, m-learning, language learning, task-based approach INTRODUCTION The growth of mobile technologies, like mobile phones, smart phones, personal digital assistants (PDA), and Tablet PCs have attracted the attention of the educators and researchers (Mcconatha, Praul & Lynch, 2008; Motiwalla, 2007; Thornton & Houser, 2002; Patten, Sa´nchez & Tangney, 2006) to consider its pedagogical implications. Seppala and Alamaki (2003) pointed out that the instruction via mobile devices would play an important role in the educational realm, given that 98% of the university students possessed cell phones. The educational use of the mobile devices was referred to as mobile learning (m-learning) with the focus on facilitating and extending the reach of the teaching and learning, such as the knowledge construction, the information collection and exchange, the collaborative learning (Hine, Rentoul, & Specht, 2004), independent learning (Bull & Reid, 2004) and lifelong learning (Attewell & Savill-Smith, 2004). Huang, Jeng, and Huang (2009), for example, adopted a mobile blogging system as a means for generating collaboratively interactive and learning opportunities for geographically dispersed persons and groups. Vavoula et al. (2009) used mobile phones for inquiry-based learning to allow learners to gather information during school visits to museums. Mobile learning has been acknowledged as a useful approach in language skills training, particularly for English as Foreign Language (EFL) students (e.g., Chen & Huang, 2010; Chang, Chen, & Hsu, 2011; Hwang & Chang, 2011; Lee, 2009; Sandberg, Maris, & Geus, 2011). Due to the spontaneous, informal, contextual, portable, ubiquitous, pervasive, and personal features of the mobile learning, students were provided with more access and greater exposure to abundant authentic learning contexts (O’Malley et al, 2003). The authentic learning contexts via mobile learning in turn have positive effects on second language acquisition (Gulati, 2008; Judd, Kennedy, & Cropper, 2010; Kreijins, Kirschner, & Jochems, 2003; Mompean, 2010). The authentic learning contexts help students bridge the gap between formal and informal learning experiences (Kolb, 2006; Wagner &Wilson, 2005). In other words, the authentic tasks in real word situations allow students to connect the contents of the textbooks with real world materials to achieve better comprehension and learning outcomes (Kolb, 2006). Wagner and Wilson (2005) also highlighted that students can better transfer the acquired language skills into the real life situations if they have developed the language skills in authentic contexts. In addition, students demonstrated high learning motivation when they became engaged in the authentic learning tasks. Related empirical studies have manifested the effectiveness of mobile learning upon the language teaching and learning. For example, Attewell (2005) designed a mobile learning project to motivate students to learn a foreign language. She found that 82% of the students improved their reading comprehension and spelling skills via mobile learning, and 62% of the students expressed their continual use of mobile devices to learn the language. Basoglu and Akdemir (2010) recruited 60 university students to examine the effectiveness of the mobile devices and conventional flashcards upon English vocabulary learning. The findings showed that students displayed better academic performance in the learning vocabulary and had positive attitudes toward learning English vocabulary via mobile learning. Many factors may negatively influence the effectiveness of mobile learning upon language instruction which result in a lower percentage of the students’ learning participation in mobile learning (Gulati, 2008; Isman & Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 148
Page 2 and 3:
THE TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF EDUCA
Page 4 and 5:
Dear Colleagues, TOJET: The Turkish
Page 6 and 7:
TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal o
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Annotation retrieval TOJET: The Tur
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Stage 2 Process Stage 3 Output Stag
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109: TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal o
Page 114 and 115: Learning effectiveness TOJET: The T
Page 118 and 119: Appendix A: Questionnaire TOJET: Th
Page 136 and 137: 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 TOJET: The Turk
Page 180 and 181: Computer Use Transformational Leade
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Diverger TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
clarify their misconceptions. TOJET
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
*p < .05 TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
section to the user. TOJET: The Tur
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Statement Analysis TOJET: The Turki
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Appendices TOJET: The Turkish Onlin
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
TOJEET: The Turkish Online Journal
Page 414 and 415:
TOJEET: The Turkish Online Journal
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
eactions TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 470:
show all

october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?