24.12.2012 Views

october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>TOJET</strong>: The <strong>Turkish</strong> Online Journal <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology – October <strong>2012</strong>, volume 11 Issue 4<br />

Item Bank<br />

Begin with Provisional Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency Estimate<br />

Select & Display Optimal Test Item<br />

Observe & Evaluate Response<br />

Revise Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency Estimate<br />

Is Stopping Rule Satisfied?<br />

Figure 8. The Procedure <strong>of</strong> Computerized Adaptive Testing<br />

RESULTS<br />

The Reliability and Item Parameters <strong>of</strong> Chinese Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency Test<br />

Table 1 shows <strong>the</strong> reliability (Cronbach's α) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chinese pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test. The reliability in each section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

test ranged from 0.842 to 0.899 reflect a reasonable degree <strong>of</strong> reliability. In general, an alpha value <strong>of</strong> around 0.8<br />

is an acceptable value for Chinese pr<strong>of</strong>iciency test. (Shen, 2005), this means that <strong>the</strong>se Chinese pr<strong>of</strong>iciency tests<br />

are reliable.<br />

Table 1. The Test Reliability<br />

Section Test Length Effective Sample Size Cronbach’s α<br />

A1 listening 35 798 0.842<br />

A1 reading 35 797 0.897<br />

A2 listening 35 712 0.899<br />

A2 reading 35 706 0.869<br />

The averages <strong>of</strong> item parameters for each section presented in Table 2 show that <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> item<br />

discrimination in <strong>the</strong> listening and reading sections were higher than 1.2. This indicated a very high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

item discrimination had developed in each section. In addition, according to <strong>the</strong> IRT model, <strong>the</strong> average correct<br />

rates are 68.44%, 69.51%, 69.38%, and 58.26% for A1 listening, A1 reading, A2 listing, and A2 reading section<br />

respectively.<br />

Table 2. Averages <strong>of</strong> Item Parameters in Each Section<br />

Section a b c P(Θ)<br />

A1 listening 1.2223 -0.4742 0.2075 0.6844<br />

A1 reading 1.2425 -0.4473 0.2048 0.6951<br />

A2 listening 1.3145 -0.4637 0.1998 0.6938<br />

A2 reading 1.2125 -0.0214 0.2085 0.5826<br />

The Chinese Pr<strong>of</strong>iciencies <strong>of</strong> Total, Male and Female Groups<br />

Table 3 shows <strong>the</strong> sample sizes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total group and <strong>the</strong> gender subgroups for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4 forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CPT.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> various test forms, <strong>the</strong> male group comprised 47% to 48% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total group, and <strong>the</strong> female group<br />

comprised 52% to 53% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total group. The average number-correct scores and standard deviations for groups<br />

taking different forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CPT are summarized in Table 4. It shows that <strong>the</strong> female group had higher mean<br />

Yes<br />

End <strong>of</strong> Test<br />

Copyright © The <strong>Turkish</strong> Online Journal <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology<br />

No<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!