october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4 REFERENCES Bilalic, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 108(3), 652-661. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2011). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 57(6), 303-320. Chang, S. H., Chen, M. L., Kuo, Y. K., & Shen, Y. C. (2011). A simulation-based LED device design project in photonics instruction based on industry-university collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 582-589. Chang, S. H. (2006). Enhancing the skills of Photonics device design through the project-Based course development and evaluation. (NSC Publication No. 95-2516-S-018-001-MY3). Taipei: National Science Council. Choi, R. J., Hahn, Y. B., Shim, H. W., Han, M. S., Suh, E. K., & Lee, H. J. (2003). Efficient blue light-emitting diodes with InGaN/GaN triangular shaped multiple quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters, 82(17), 2764–2766. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 37(4), 346- 354. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322. Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551-569. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2 nd Ed). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers. Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem finding and the inventiveness of solutions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 12- 18. Huang, J. (2009). Taiwan’s solar-optoelectronics and LED industries forecast to hit NT$1 trillion production value by 2015. LEDinside. Retrieved from http://www.ledinside.com.tw/news_2015_ LED_20091105. Honebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 11-24). NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publication Inc. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432. Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1122- 1125. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: An effective weblearning strategy with the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological monographs, 54(6), 248-295. Lunette, V., & Hofstein, A. (1991). Simulation and laboratory practical activity. In B. Woodnough, (Ed.), Practical Science. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open Univ. Press. Macías-Guarasa, J., Montero, J. M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., & Nieto-Taladriz, O. (2006). A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 389- 397. Maskell, D. L., & Grabau, P. J. (1998). A multidisciplinary cooperative problem-based learning approach to embedded systems design. IEEE Transactions on Education, 41(2), 101-103. Oder, T. N., Kim, K. H., Lin, J. Y., & Jiang, H. X. (2004). III-nitride blue and ultraviolet photonic crystal light emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters, 84(4), 466–469. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250. Rieber, L. P., & Parmley, M. W. (1995). To teach or not to teach? Comparing the use of computer-based simulations in deductive versus inductive approaches to learning with adults in science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 359-374. Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 829-845. Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 343-353. Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 245
TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4 Stern, F., Tao, X., Yarbrough, D. B., Rothmayer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S. P., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutchings, B., & Moeykens, S. (2006). Hands-on CFD educational interface for engineering courses and laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 63-83. Sullivan, M. E, Hitchcock, M. A., & Dunnington, G. L. (1999). Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. The American Journal of Surgery, 177, 266-269. Sweller, J., Van-Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and Instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-297. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. Tsai, C. C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13, 31-52. Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42(2), 193-205. Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A network peer assessment system based on a vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Training International, 38(3), 220-230. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace and World. Wen, M. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University student’s perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83-92. Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 3-8). NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publication Inc. Yaeger, K. A. R., Halamek, L. P. M., Coyle, M. M., Murphy, A. M. D., Anderson, J. M., Boyle, K. N., Braccta, K. R., Mcauley, J. N., Sandre, G. M., & Smith, B. R. (2004). High-fidelify simulation-based training in neonatal nursing. Advances in Neonatal Care, 4(6), 326-331 Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 246
Page 2 and 3:
THE TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF EDUCA
Page 4 and 5:
Dear Colleagues, TOJET: The Turkish
Page 6 and 7:
TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal o
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Annotation retrieval TOJET: The Tur
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Stage 2 Process Stage 3 Output Stag
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Learning effectiveness TOJET: The T
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Appendix A: Questionnaire TOJET: Th
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 TOJET: The Turk
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Computer Use Transformational Leade
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207: TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal o
Page 226 and 227: Diverger TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 248 and 249: clarify their misconceptions. TOJET
Page 262 and 263: *p < .05 TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 300 and 301: section to the user. TOJET: The Tur
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Statement Analysis TOJET: The Turki
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Appendices TOJET: The Turkish Onlin
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
TOJEET: The Turkish Online Journal
Page 414 and 415:
TOJEET: The Turkish Online Journal
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
eactions TOJET: The Turkish Online
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 470:
show all

october 2012 - TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?