24.12.2012 Views

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5. Fingerprinted with the M13 probe. Individual 908 is the family sire. A + indicates the<br />

presence of a particular marker allele.<br />

Individual<br />

Marker 908 7099 7137 8030 7118 8039 7124 8041 8029 7164 7105 7218<br />

MIO + + + +<br />

+<br />

M14 +<br />

+<br />

M15<br />

+ +<br />

M18 + + +<br />

M29<br />

+<br />

M30 +<br />

M33<br />

+<br />

M36 + + + + +<br />

+ + + +<br />

M37<br />

+<br />

M41<br />

+<br />

M44 + + +<br />

ten markers, all family groups sampled were<br />

represented. These ten markers were grouped<br />

within five haifsib groups, or lines, and are the<br />

basis for comparison in the remainder of this<br />

report. Figure 5 shows multilocus genotypes for<br />

a halfsib group fingerprinted with the M13<br />

probe.<br />

Statistical analysis of growth and indicators<br />

of parasitism were performed on those<br />

goats which had blood samples analyzed (table<br />

6 and figure 6). Instead of breed effects, the<br />

goats were divided into five sire groups or lines<br />

and this designation was used in the model.<br />

Evaluation of body weight from birth to one<br />

year of age demonstrates the differences which<br />

existed between the different lines on test. Line<br />

1was consistently the heaviest group evaluated,<br />

while line 5 was the smallest. A nu<strong>mb</strong>er of<br />

factors besides genetic resistance to internal<br />

parasites could be responsible for those differ-<br />

ences (e.g., breed differences). That is not to say<br />

that if genetic resistance is present, that it is not<br />

helping to facilitate the growth and development<br />

of the kids tested. As more animals are<br />

screened, it will be possible to perform a much<br />

more comprehensive analysis to discriminate<br />

between sources of variation.<br />

A critical variable used in analysis of<br />

animal health was PCV. PCVs were cellected<br />

every 14 days, however their interpretation was<br />

confounded by changes in animal status between<br />

times of measurement. For example, if<br />

worm burden was high enough to require a<br />

drench, PCV for the next measurement period<br />

might increase dramatically. The mean PCVs<br />

did not differ greatly between lines, however,<br />

the minimum and maximum measurements did.<br />

Differences between lines were larger for FEC<br />

than PCV, however, these differences were not<br />

significantly different between markers.<br />

Table 6. Mean packed Cell Volume, Fecal Egg Counts and markers.<br />

Line<br />

TRAIT 1 2 3 4 5<br />

PCV 31.2 30.9 31.2 30.8 31.6<br />

FEC 5831 3610 6723 7929 7368<br />

Markers M9,M21,M60 M10,M36 M59,M61 M3,M52 M49<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!