24.12.2012 Views

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Research Results - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not significant. This could imply that if M60<br />

is associated with resistance to helminths, its<br />

mediated effects are in lowering the impact<br />

that parasites have on the goats, rather than<br />

through a reduction in the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of worms<br />

established in the gut.<br />

Currently, confounding in the data is<br />

a serious problem. When t-tests were performed<br />

within line for each production<br />

character, none of the previously significant<br />

differences were found, in part, due to the<br />

small sample sizes within lines. The differences<br />

which were found to be significant<br />

were most likely to have been due to chance.<br />

The lack of an association between markers<br />

and productivity within lines indicates that<br />

larger nu<strong>mb</strong>ers of animals will have to be<br />

sampled. Some of the reasons for a lack of<br />

differences between lines are as follows. The<br />

markers present in relatively high frequencies<br />

were found only within lines (or sire<br />

groups); furthermore, breed effects and<br />

heterosis are also contributing to the confounding<br />

of the data. For example, line I is<br />

primarily KDPG, while line 5 is almost<br />

completely EAG. The variation in mature<br />

size, by breed, may be the primary factor<br />

controlling differences observed for growth.<br />

Heterosis, not only in terms of growth, but in<br />

terms of resistance to helminths may also be<br />

a part of the reason why line and marker<br />

differences were found.<br />

Even though a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of problems<br />

exist with the collected data at this time, the<br />

initial results from this experiment are promising.<br />

As more data on animals are collected, we<br />

will be better able to assess the potential for<br />

using molecular genetics techniques in conjunction<br />

with other animal breeding practices.<br />

However, even if markers ai3sociated with<br />

resistance to internal parasites and productivity<br />

are not located, the breeding project will still be<br />

able to select for resistance based upon animal<br />

performance, PCV and FEC.<br />

B.RAPD Analysis<br />

Table 8. Band scoring for APMd and AP9<br />

One hundred and five goats were bled<br />

and DNA was extracted. The goats were of<br />

various breed types representing purebred Galla<br />

and East African, first generation two-way and<br />

four-way (KDPG) crosses and second generation<br />

KDPG goats. Genetic polymorphisms were<br />

detected using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic<br />

DNA marker techniques (RAPD). This<br />

procedure uses the polymerase chain reaction<br />

(PCR) to randomly amplify segments of an<br />

animal's genome which are surrounded by an<br />

arbitrarily chosen ten base primer sequence.<br />

After completion of the PCR, the contents are<br />

then electrophoresed on an agarose gel to<br />

separate DNA based on the length of the amplifled<br />

products. Initially, five different 10 base<br />

primers were used to screen the caprine genome<br />

for polymorphisms. Three primers detected<br />

polymorphic bands: AP3, AP8d, and AP9 with<br />

three, three, and five polymorphic bands,<br />

respectively. The results of band scoring for<br />

AP8d and AP9 are in table 8.<br />

Primer Nu<strong>mb</strong>er Fragment Occurrence Frequency<br />

Scored Length (bp)<br />

AP8d 43 1020 32 .744<br />

920 28 .651<br />

850 1 .023<br />

AP9 53 915 46 .885<br />

905 39 .750<br />

575 1 .019<br />

540 8 .151<br />

500 16 .302<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!