26.12.2012 Views

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Homometallic</strong> <strong>Alkoxides</strong> 115<br />

R D Pr i ⊲soluble⊳. M D Sn; x D 4; y D 1 ⊲soluble⊳, 2 ⊲insoluble⊳;<br />

R D Pr i . M D Sb; x D 3; y D 1 ⊲soluble⊳;RD Et, Pr i ⊳<br />

Interestingly, when the reaction of Ge(OPri⊳4 with HOCH2CH2NH2 was carried out<br />

in 1:2 molar ratio, the product was not Ge(OCH2CH2NH⊳2; instead,<br />

Ge(OCH2CH2NH)(OCH2CH2NH2)(OPri ) was obtained, and if the reactants were in<br />

1:3 molar ratio, Ge(OCH2CH2NH⊳(OCH2CH2NH2)2 was the main product.<br />

In these cases, the increasing reactivity of the amino group in aminoalkoxides may<br />

O<br />

be due to intramolecular coordination of the type: M<br />

C2H 4,<br />

rendering the<br />

N<br />

H2 amino hydrogens more reactive.<br />

Tin alkoxides form cyclic derivatives with alkanolamines in equimolar ratio and<br />

the same is the case with germanium alkoxides but silicon alkoxides show reactivity<br />

restricted to the hydroxyl group only. The poor reactivity of silicon alkoxides may be<br />

attributed to the fact that silicon prefers to involve its d-orbitals by -bonding whereas<br />

Sn and Ge prefer -bonding. 702 This may be reflected in the order of estimated M–O<br />

bond energies of Si–O, Ge–O, and Sn–O, which are 112, 85, and 82 kcal mol 1 ,<br />

respectively. 472,702,703<br />

A comparative study of the reactions of M(OR)4 (M D Si, Ge, Sn) with alkanolamines<br />

indicated the following order of reactivity: Sn > Ge × Si.<br />

The non-involvement of the –NH2 group in the formation of intramolecular N !<br />

Si bonding has been substantiated by infrared516,696,704 and proton magnetic resonance696,705<br />

studies.<br />

4.4.2 Dialkanolamines<br />

Reactions of metal alkoxides with dialkanolamines afford a variety of structurally<br />

interesting products depending on the stoichiometric ratios of the reactants as illustrated<br />

by Eqs (2.207)–(2.217):<br />

M⊲OPr i ⊳2 C 2⊲HOC2H4⊳2NH benzene<br />

! MfOC2H4⊳NH⊲C2H4OH⊳g2 # C 2Pr<br />

C<br />

i OH<br />

⊲2.207⊳<br />

where M D Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba. 706,707<br />

M⊲OPr i ⊳3 C ⊲HOC2H4⊳2NH benzene<br />

! ⊲Pr i O⊳MfOC2H4⊳2NHgC2Pr i OH ⊲2.208⊳<br />

where M D Al, 694 Ga, 185 Sb, 708 Fe, 283 Y, Gd, Er, Yb. 148,156<br />

M⊲OPr i ⊳3 C 2⊲HOC2H4⊳2NH<br />

benzene<br />

! M[f⊲OC2H4⊳2NHgf⊲OC2H4⊳NH⊲C2H4OH⊳g] # C 3Pr<br />

D<br />

i OH ⊲2.209⊳

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!