26.12.2012 Views

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

2 Homometallic Alkoxides

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 Alkoxo and Aryloxo Derivatives of Metals<br />

Thus, whereas modes (4-IV) and (4-VI) would imply symmetrical bridges, (4-V) should<br />

be unsymmetrical. In addition to the all- -bonding 3-mode (4-VII) involving twoelectron<br />

two-centred localized bonds, there is also the possibility of 4-bridging, etc.<br />

involving delocalized bonding.<br />

A distinguishing feature of the alkoxo group as a ligand is its steric effect. By<br />

increasing the size and chain branching of the R-group the steric effect of RO may be<br />

increased sufficiently to prevent alkoxo-bridging and thus result in a mononuclear metal<br />

alkoxide. This effect is obviously greater in the alkoxides of metals in higher valencies,<br />

e.g. M(OR) 6,M(OR) 5,M(OR) 4, owing to their greater intramolecular congestion. The<br />

electronic effect of the alkoxo ligand also plays a part in structure determination. An<br />

electronegative substituent X (e.g. CF3) inXCH2O– will reduce the electron density<br />

on the donor oxygen thereby weakening the bridging modes (4-IV–4-VII). At the<br />

same time the electrophilic nature of the metal ion will be enhanced, leading to the<br />

acquisition of a supplementary neutral ligand L (e.g. THF, py, etc.) and the formation<br />

of a mononuclear adduct [M(OCH2X)x Ly]. This is well illustrated by lanthanum which<br />

forms the trinuclear tertiary butoxide [La3⊲ 3-OBu t )2⊲ -OBu t ⊳3(OBu t ⊳4(Bu t OH⊳2] 6 but<br />

gives the mononuclear [LafOCMe(CF3⊳2g3(thf) 3] 7 with hexafluoro-tertiary butoxide,<br />

although the metal is six-coordinated in both molecules.<br />

In an early attempt to rationalize the known structures of homoleptic metal alkoxides<br />

[M(OR) x]n it was noted by Bradley 8 that the alkoxides which were soluble in common<br />

organic solvents usually exhibited low degrees of oligomerization (e.g. n D 2, 3, or 4). It<br />

was proposed that in the less sterically demanding alkoxo groups (e.g. MeO, EtO, Pr n O,<br />

etc.) the metal M utilized the bridging propensity of the alkoxo group to achieve the smallest<br />

oligomer compatible with all the metal atoms attaining their preferred coordination<br />

number. To minimize the complexity of a polynuclear metal alkoxide it is necessary to<br />

maximize the number of bridging alkoxo groups between adjacent pairs of metal atoms.<br />

For tetrahedral or octahedral metal coordination this means face-sharing rather than<br />

edge-sharing polyhedra. Thus, although a trivalent metal can achieve four-coordination<br />

(distorted tetrahedral) by forming an edge-bridged dimer [M2⊲ -OR) 2(OR) 4] (Fig. 4.1)<br />

and a pentavalent metal can achieve six-coordination (distorted octahedral) by also forming<br />

an edge-bridged dimer [M2⊲ -OR⊳2(OR) 8] (Fig. 4.2), a tetravalent metal would<br />

require face-bridging octahedra in order to form the trimer [M3⊲ -OR⊳6(OR) 6] (Fig. 4.3),<br />

the minimum sized oligomer for M(OR) 4. Molecular weight measurements on supercooled<br />

titanium tetraethoxide in benzene solution indicated that a trimer was the predominant<br />

species, but the X-ray crystal structures of [Ti4⊲OMe⊳16], [Ti4⊲OEt⊳16], and<br />

[Ti4⊲OEt⊳4⊲OMe⊳12] all revealed the edge-sharing tetranuclear structure [Ti4⊲ 3-OR⊳2⊲ -<br />

OR⊳4⊲OR⊳10] 9 (Fig. 4.4). It was observed by Chisholm 10 that this particular structure<br />

is favoured by a number of species [M4⊲OR⊳x XyLz ](whereXD anionic ligand; L D<br />

neutral ligand; x C y C z D 16). It thus appears that edge-sharing is favoured although<br />

R<br />

O<br />

O<br />

R<br />

M<br />

R<br />

O M<br />

O<br />

R<br />

R<br />

O<br />

O<br />

R<br />

Figure 4.1 Structure of<br />

[M2⊲ -OR⊳2⊲OR⊳4].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!