27.12.2012 Views

Inorganic Microporous Membranes for Gas Separation in Fossil Fuel ...

Inorganic Microporous Membranes for Gas Separation in Fossil Fuel ...

Inorganic Microporous Membranes for Gas Separation in Fossil Fuel ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Results and discussion<br />

In summary, anatase TiO2 conta<strong>in</strong>s mesopores <strong>in</strong> the temperature range of 400 to 600ºC.<br />

The average crystal size and the pore size seem to be coupled and <strong>in</strong>crease with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g calc<strong>in</strong>ation temperature. Tetragonal ZrO2 is ma<strong>in</strong>ly microporous below 600ºC.<br />

However, the ZrO2 powder with a specific surface area of approximately 75 m 2 /g might<br />

result <strong>in</strong> low permeable membrane layers. Besides, both TiO2 and ZrO2 show phase<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>mations <strong>in</strong> the temperature range of 500-600ºC. This could lead to cracks dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the calc<strong>in</strong>ation as a result of thermal expansion mismatches of the phases.<br />

The crystallisation temperature of Ti0.5Zr0.5O2 is between 550 and 600ºC which is<br />

approximately 250ºC higher than s<strong>in</strong>gle oxides 320-360ºC. The higher crystallisation<br />

temperature could suppress the crystal growth while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the microporosity. The<br />

crystallisation temperature, high porosity, high microporosity and small pore size bulk<br />

material properties of Ti0.5Zr0.5O2 calc<strong>in</strong>ed at 500ºC are similar to state of the art SiO2.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>dicates that Ti0.5Zr0.5O2 might <strong>for</strong>m microporous membrane layers as well.<br />

However, amorphous microporous materials might have a lower chemical stability<br />

compared to their s<strong>in</strong>gle oxide relatives.<br />

4.3.2.6 Am<strong>in</strong>e approach – Diethanolam<strong>in</strong>e / Diisopropanolam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

The precursor modifier diethanolam<strong>in</strong>e (DEA) is replaced <strong>in</strong> the sol synthesis by<br />

equimolar diisopropanolam<strong>in</strong>e (DIPA) to i) <strong>in</strong>crease the viscosity, ii) better compatibility<br />

with the propanol solvent and iii) prevention of densification by <strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g higher porosity.<br />

No literature was found on this potential precursor modifier.<br />

No significant difference <strong>in</strong> the DTA/TG analyses and carbon content results are obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

when DIPA was used <strong>in</strong>stead of DEA as precursor modifier <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

oxides with 25 and 50 mol % TiO2 <strong>in</strong> ZrO2 up to 500ºC.<br />

Figure 60-A presents type I sorption isotherms of 50 mol % TiO2 <strong>in</strong> ZrO2 us<strong>in</strong>g DIPA,<br />

which have specific surface area trends comparable with 50 mol % TiO2 <strong>in</strong> ZrO2 us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DEA (Table 26). However, the specific surface areas of 25 and 50 mol % TiO2 <strong>in</strong> ZrO2 at<br />

400ºC us<strong>in</strong>g DIPA are a factor 2 higher than when DEA was used (Table 26 and Figure<br />

60-B). The higher specific surfaces are of dried and calc<strong>in</strong>ed DIPA sols may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by the longer organic cha<strong>in</strong> of DIPA compared to DEA.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!