27.12.2012 Views

Bureau of Land Management's Decision Record and Environmental

Bureau of Land Management's Decision Record and Environmental

Bureau of Land Management's Decision Record and Environmental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jersey Valley Geothermal Development Project<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment: NV063 -EAO8-09 1<br />

* AUMs will be rounded to the appropriate whole number<br />

All Project activities are located away from sources <strong>of</strong> water in the vicinity <strong>and</strong> will not prevent<br />

livestock access to the available sources <strong>of</strong> water in the area.<br />

To prevent access by cattle to areas which might be harmful to them, Ormat has committed to<br />

fence reserve pits <strong>and</strong> the power plant site in conformance with the Gold Book, <strong>and</strong> has not<br />

proposed any Project activities which would substantially limit livestock’s access to the<br />

undisturbed portions <strong>of</strong> the Jersey Valley Unit Area.<br />

Due to the small percentage <strong>of</strong> the allotment’s acres lost to direct disturbance, Ormat’s fencing <strong>of</strong><br />

those Project facilities potentially harmful to livestock, <strong>and</strong> the fact that Project facilities <strong>and</strong><br />

practices would not prevent continued access by livestock to the undisturbed l<strong>and</strong>s within the<br />

Jersey Valley Unit Area <strong>and</strong> along the transmission line corridor, no impacts to range resources<br />

are expected.<br />

Ormat’s proposed activities are generally located away from the range improvement projects.<br />

The transmission line is proposed to cross the Cow Creek Pipeline. Ormat has committed to<br />

“span” this pipeline <strong>and</strong> not place transmission line poles in such a way as to damage the existing<br />

pipeline, therefore no impacts to the Cow Creek Pipeline are anticipated.<br />

3.12.2.2 Alternative 1<br />

The construction, operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> Alternative 1 would differ from the Proposed<br />

Action only by the small increase (0.25 acre) in the total permanent surface disturbance. The<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> Alternative 1 to Rangel<strong>and</strong> would not be different from that <strong>of</strong> the Proposed Action.<br />

3.13 RECREATION<br />

3.13.1 Affected Environment<br />

Known dispersed recreational use within the Jersey Valley Unit Area is evidenced in the soaking<br />

facility constructed downstream <strong>of</strong> the hot springs located in the SW1/4 Section 29, T27N, R4OE<br />

(see Section 3.9.1). Within the transmission line corridor, recreation use is low <strong>and</strong> mainly<br />

associated with dispersed driving for pleasure, hunting, wildlife viewing <strong>and</strong> OHV use.<br />

3.13.2 <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

3.13.2.1 Proposed Action<br />

The closest project activity within the Jersey Valley Unit Area is well site 17-28 <strong>and</strong> the<br />

associated production pipeline. As these proposed Project components are over 0.25 miles from<br />

the soaking facility, no impacts are anticipated.<br />

Project operations should not adversely affect the ability <strong>of</strong> recreational users to either access or<br />

- 77<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!