COP_2023_V7_pages
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.7.5 For trials activities, as opposed to operational deployments, it will take a detailed process of review and selection<br />
by the ‘Operator’ to identify and match the necessary functional and operational requirements to the Waterspace<br />
availability and conditions needed.<br />
3.7.6 To achieve a successful, authorised and approved MASS deployment a number of Waterspace Authorities may<br />
need to be consulted dependent on the area requirements and the extent of the evaluation tasking. This may include<br />
the area authorities from inshore to offshore ‘ownerships’ who may need to be consulted to cover the whole<br />
deployment planned operations and also the waterfront support facilities, communications and surveillance<br />
requirements. The principal points of contact are the Harbour Masters (HM) and Inner Harbour Authorities, the MCA<br />
Maritime Future Technology Team, Marine Scotland, and, potentially other UK Government Departments, MMO<br />
(Marine Management Organisation) especially where sensor and transmitter operating licences may be required.<br />
Initial contact to the local HM is recommended in order to gain a full appreciation of the bounded area and adjacent<br />
authorities, and other constraints such as environmental restrictions.<br />
3.7.7 Notice to Mariners and appropriate radio navigation warnings (e.g. RNW and WZ) should be issued as<br />
appropriate.<br />
3.7.8 During the planning phase of any MASS Operational deployment the following additional operators and or<br />
authorities should also be considered, and notification issued and or clearance obtained where relevant:<br />
n Fishermen (Bulletin of intended ops);<br />
n Offshore operators (i.e. Oil & Gas, and Renewable Energy operators/owners);<br />
n Established local water sport leisure clubs and organisations;<br />
n Other stakeholders with economical, safety or environmental interests in intended location.<br />
3.7.9 In working to achieve the necessary approvals, it is expected that a suite of HSE documentation should be<br />
provided to support the mission and assure the relevant approving authorities that full consideration to the safety<br />
and risk management of the intended operation or evaluation trial has been completed. This may include a full<br />
HSE Plan, Launch and Recovery Risk Assessment, Emergency Recovery Plan and Procedure, and the outline<br />
Mission Plan and Method Statement. These documents will support the approval application and ensure all<br />
operations are conducted within the intent of this Code. It also provides proof of the application of Industry Best<br />
Practice and cognizance of the sensitivity and responsibility to societal acceptance of autonomous systems.<br />
3.7.10 When a MASS operator is planning to complete operations within designated areas where offshore structures<br />
are present, or are being constructed, it is expected the appropriate approval from the Offshore operator is sought<br />
from the Offshore Wind Farm Developer or Oil/Gas Installation Operator. As part of this operator approval of the<br />
mission, Risk assessment, emergency response plan and a communication plan will be required.<br />
3.7.11 In general, all offshore structures have operational coordination. This will be through a Marine Co-ordination<br />
Centre (MCC) for Offshore wind, or Offshore Installation Manager (OIM) for Oil/Gas installations. The MASS<br />
operator must liaise with the appropriate coordinator to seek permission to access the work area and follow the<br />
Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) and entry protocols.<br />
3.7.12 The documentation submitted by the owner/operator will be as appropriate for the intended operation and could<br />
include full formal safety assessments. As a minimum it should be to the standard expected by the relevant Health<br />
and Safety Executive.<br />
MASS UK Industry Conduct Principles and Code of Practice Version 7<br />
29