29.12.2012 Views

WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis

WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis

WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH<br />

RISKS: MOVING FROM PAPER‐BASED ISSUANCE TO AN E‐<strong>WIC</strong> SOLUTION<br />

Instructions<br />

Numerical<br />

Risk Rating Definition<br />

Lowest risk or lowest additional risk if<br />

Col. B This column identifies the major risk categories.<br />

1 implementing alternative<br />

This column identifies the risks within the categories. Stated risks may be edited or new risks<br />

Average risk or no additional risk of<br />

Col. C may be added, as determined by the State.<br />

2 implementing alternative<br />

Determine the level of risk (High, Medium or Low) in moving from paper to e‐<strong>WIC</strong>. Score high<br />

Highest risk or highest addition of risk if<br />

Col. D risk as 3, medium as 2 <strong>and</strong> low as 1.<br />

Identify whether individual e‐<strong>WIC</strong> alternatives bring added risk (3), has no impact to the level of<br />

3 implementing alternative<br />

Cols E‐G<br />

Cols H‐J<br />

risk (2) or decreases the level of risk (1)<br />

Risk ratings will be automatically calculated in these columns. No entry required.<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Col. K<br />

If applicable, provide information to support or clarify the determination of the rating.<br />

Lowest average score below denotes lowest risk alternative, <strong>and</strong> therefore of highest benefit.<br />

A B C D E F G H I J<br />

Impact of Risk<br />

On‐Line<br />

Risk of on On‐Line Impact of Risk Impact of Risk Outsourced On‐Line In‐ Off‐Line In‐<br />

Implementing Outsourced e‐ on On‐Line In‐ on Off‐Line In‐ e‐<strong>WIC</strong> Risk House e‐<strong>WIC</strong> House e‐<strong>WIC</strong><br />

Risk Category Risk Identification<br />

e‐<strong>WIC</strong> <strong>WIC</strong> house e‐<strong>WIC</strong> House e‐<strong>WIC</strong> Rating Risk Rating Risk Rating<br />

1 Organizational <strong>and</strong><br />

Change Management Adapt to necessary changes in organization structure.<br />

1 2 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />

2 Adapt to necessary changes in policies <strong>and</strong> procedures procedures. 2 2 2 2 40 4.0 40 4.0 40 4.0<br />

3 Business Disruption of services to <strong>WIC</strong> clients or retailers 2 3 1 1 6.0 2.0 2.0<br />

4 Retailer investment in hardware 3 2 2 2 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />

5 Retailer investment in software 3 2 2 2 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />

6 Ability to obtain qualified e‐<strong>WIC</strong> vendor or services of<br />

qualified contractors.<br />

1 1 1 3 1.0 1.0 3.0<br />

7 Retailer acceptance of e‐<strong>WIC</strong> 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

8 Data <strong>and</strong> Information Ability to acquire <strong>and</strong> maintain accurate <strong>and</strong> complete<br />

data.<br />

1 2 1 1 2.0 1.0 1.0<br />

9 Ability to provide comprehensive audit trails <strong>and</strong><br />

financial reporting.<br />

1 2 1 1 2.0 1.0 1.0<br />

10 Technology Adequate technical expertise of ongoing staff. 1 1 1 2 1.0 1.0 2.0<br />

11 Ability to adapt system to changes in policies <strong>and</strong><br />

regulations.<br />

1 2 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />

12 Ability to adapt to changes in technologies. 2 2 2 3 4.0 4.0 6.0<br />

13 Security Adequate security of the system or data 2 3 2 1 6.0 4.0 2.0<br />

14<br />

Adequate security of e‐<strong>WIC</strong> cards <strong>and</strong> related materials<br />

1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

15<br />

Adequate security of participants' benefits after issuance<br />

1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

16 Adequate control of benefit loss <strong>and</strong> diversion 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

17 Privacy Adequate protection of the privacy of <strong>WIC</strong> participants 1 1 2 2 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />

18 Resources Ability to obtain sufficient funding for system<br />

implementation<br />

2 1 2 2 2.0 4.0 4.0<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Schedule Ability to implement in parallel with SAM 3 1 3 1 3.0 9.0 3.0<br />

Quantity of Rated Risks 19 19 19<br />

Average Risk Rating 2.74 2.79 2.63<br />

Return to Index<br />

K<br />

Comments/Mitigation<br />

E‐<strong>WIC</strong> <strong>Cost‐Benefit</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> Risk <strong>Analysis</strong> Page 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!