WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis
WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis
WIC EBT Feasibility Study and Cost‐Benefit Analysis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH<br />
RISKS: MOVING FROM PAPER‐BASED ISSUANCE TO AN E‐<strong>WIC</strong> SOLUTION<br />
Instructions<br />
Numerical<br />
Risk Rating Definition<br />
Lowest risk or lowest additional risk if<br />
Col. B This column identifies the major risk categories.<br />
1 implementing alternative<br />
This column identifies the risks within the categories. Stated risks may be edited or new risks<br />
Average risk or no additional risk of<br />
Col. C may be added, as determined by the State.<br />
2 implementing alternative<br />
Determine the level of risk (High, Medium or Low) in moving from paper to e‐<strong>WIC</strong>. Score high<br />
Highest risk or highest addition of risk if<br />
Col. D risk as 3, medium as 2 <strong>and</strong> low as 1.<br />
Identify whether individual e‐<strong>WIC</strong> alternatives bring added risk (3), has no impact to the level of<br />
3 implementing alternative<br />
Cols E‐G<br />
Cols H‐J<br />
risk (2) or decreases the level of risk (1)<br />
Risk ratings will be automatically calculated in these columns. No entry required.<br />
<strong>Analysis</strong><br />
Col. K<br />
If applicable, provide information to support or clarify the determination of the rating.<br />
Lowest average score below denotes lowest risk alternative, <strong>and</strong> therefore of highest benefit.<br />
A B C D E F G H I J<br />
Impact of Risk<br />
On‐Line<br />
Risk of on On‐Line Impact of Risk Impact of Risk Outsourced On‐Line In‐ Off‐Line In‐<br />
Implementing Outsourced e‐ on On‐Line In‐ on Off‐Line In‐ e‐<strong>WIC</strong> Risk House e‐<strong>WIC</strong> House e‐<strong>WIC</strong><br />
Risk Category Risk Identification<br />
e‐<strong>WIC</strong> <strong>WIC</strong> house e‐<strong>WIC</strong> House e‐<strong>WIC</strong> Rating Risk Rating Risk Rating<br />
1 Organizational <strong>and</strong><br />
Change Management Adapt to necessary changes in organization structure.<br />
1 2 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
2 Adapt to necessary changes in policies <strong>and</strong> procedures procedures. 2 2 2 2 40 4.0 40 4.0 40 4.0<br />
3 Business Disruption of services to <strong>WIC</strong> clients or retailers 2 3 1 1 6.0 2.0 2.0<br />
4 Retailer investment in hardware 3 2 2 2 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />
5 Retailer investment in software 3 2 2 2 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />
6 Ability to obtain qualified e‐<strong>WIC</strong> vendor or services of<br />
qualified contractors.<br />
1 1 1 3 1.0 1.0 3.0<br />
7 Retailer acceptance of e‐<strong>WIC</strong> 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
8 Data <strong>and</strong> Information Ability to acquire <strong>and</strong> maintain accurate <strong>and</strong> complete<br />
data.<br />
1 2 1 1 2.0 1.0 1.0<br />
9 Ability to provide comprehensive audit trails <strong>and</strong><br />
financial reporting.<br />
1 2 1 1 2.0 1.0 1.0<br />
10 Technology Adequate technical expertise of ongoing staff. 1 1 1 2 1.0 1.0 2.0<br />
11 Ability to adapt system to changes in policies <strong>and</strong><br />
regulations.<br />
1 2 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
12 Ability to adapt to changes in technologies. 2 2 2 3 4.0 4.0 6.0<br />
13 Security Adequate security of the system or data 2 3 2 1 6.0 4.0 2.0<br />
14<br />
Adequate security of e‐<strong>WIC</strong> cards <strong>and</strong> related materials<br />
1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
15<br />
Adequate security of participants' benefits after issuance<br />
1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
16 Adequate control of benefit loss <strong>and</strong> diversion 1 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
17 Privacy Adequate protection of the privacy of <strong>WIC</strong> participants 1 1 2 2 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />
18 Resources Ability to obtain sufficient funding for system<br />
implementation<br />
2 1 2 2 2.0 4.0 4.0<br />
19<br />
20<br />
Schedule Ability to implement in parallel with SAM 3 1 3 1 3.0 9.0 3.0<br />
Quantity of Rated Risks 19 19 19<br />
Average Risk Rating 2.74 2.79 2.63<br />
Return to Index<br />
K<br />
Comments/Mitigation<br />
E‐<strong>WIC</strong> <strong>Cost‐Benefit</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> Risk <strong>Analysis</strong> Page 30