29.12.2012 Views

Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the <strong>Potato</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> America).<br />

In 1914, Dr. Orton, accompanied by Dr. Appel <strong>of</strong> Germany,<br />

Dr. H. T. Gussow <strong>of</strong> Canada, Dr. Johanna Westerdijk <strong>of</strong><br />

Holland, and potato specialists from the USDA. visited the<br />

principal potato-growing areas <strong>of</strong> 13 states extending from<br />

Maine to California to study disease and other problems related<br />

to seed production. This study stimulated interest and added<br />

impetus to the movement for organized inspection programs.<br />

These efforts culminated i. the first <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>Potato</strong> Seed<br />

Certification Conference, which was held in Philadelphia, PA,<br />

on Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 28, 1914. Representatives from Canada.<br />

Germany, Ireland, the USDA, and 12 states participatud. At<br />

this conference, the basic framework <strong>of</strong> the present seed potato<br />

certification programs was formulated,<br />

Dr. Orton recommended that "a system <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial inspection<br />

and certification" be established in each <strong>of</strong> the seed-growing<br />

states, with emphasis being placed on "freedom from disease,<br />

varietal purity and vigor." The suggestion was also made that<br />

programs be administered by a "state agency such as an<br />

Experiment Station and protected by suitable legislation<br />

penalizing misu.,- <strong>of</strong> certificates." The proposal, which<br />

suggested that programs be operated on a voluntary basis and<br />

that growers stand the cost <strong>of</strong> inspection, also outlined<br />

procedures for making field inspections, established disease<br />

tolerances, suggested the use <strong>of</strong> certificates and <strong>of</strong>ficial tags for<br />

inspected seed, and proposed size and quality <strong>of</strong> tubers. Even<br />

though virus infections were not suspected at the time, the<br />

proposal recognized that "degeneration" or "running-out" <strong>of</strong><br />

seedstocks was tuber-transmitted and suggested that "seed"<br />

tubers be selected from healthy-appearing stocks.<br />

Seed potato certification programs in North America became<br />

a reality during 1913-1915, when Canada (New Brunswick and<br />

Prince Edward Island), Idaho, Maine, Maryland, Vermont. and<br />

Wisconsin established <strong>of</strong>ficial programs. Ten more states<br />

started programs between 1916 and 1919, followed by three<br />

additional Canadian provinces and eight states during<br />

1920-1922.<br />

In the early days <strong>of</strong> certification in North America, inspectors<br />

were confronted with the problems <strong>of</strong> varietal mixtures, varietal<br />

synonyms, and degeneration ur "running-out" <strong>of</strong> seed stocks.<br />

The confused picture <strong>of</strong> the degeneration complex started to<br />

clear when Quanjer et al in 1916 first established the infectious<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> potato leafroll by graft transmission; shortly<br />

thereafter, Oortwijn Botjes (1920) and Schultz and Folsom<br />

(1921) reported independently that the aphid Myzus persicae<br />

transmitted the causal entity <strong>of</strong> leafroll from plant to plant.<br />

Subsequent investigations exposed the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous tuberborne virus diseases, such as mild and severe<br />

mosaic and spindle tuber (the causal agent <strong>of</strong> which is now<br />

known to be a viroid), with seed degeneration. Recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

these diseases by certification personnel provided the ba,: far<br />

their subsequent control. A tremendous improvement in yield<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong>seed stocks occurred after certificatior personnel<br />

had mastered the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> virus diseases,<br />

Present Day Seed <strong>Potato</strong> Certification<br />

eent DaypSd<strong>Potato</strong> Certification ayand<br />

Seed potato certification today represents a voluntary<br />

agreement between the seed grower and the certif.ing agency. In<br />

the United States, programs are handled by individual states<br />

TABLE V. Field Tolerances (%)for Certified <strong>Potato</strong>es, as Required<br />

by Wisconsin Certified Seed <strong>Potato</strong> Agency, Madison<br />

Disease or Varietal Inspection<br />

Mixture First Second or Subsequent<br />

Leafroll 1.5 1.0<br />

Mosaics 2.0 1.0<br />

Spindle tuber 1.0 1.0<br />

Total 3.0 3.0<br />

Bacterial ring rot 0.0 0.0<br />

Varietal mixture 1.0 0.1<br />

104<br />

and administered by state departments <strong>of</strong> agriculture, land<br />

grant universities, grower associations, or various co<strong>mb</strong>inations<br />

<strong>of</strong> these agencies. In Canada, seed potato certification is a<br />

federal program carried out hythe Plant Quarantine Division <strong>of</strong><br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Since all agencies have been<br />

given <strong>of</strong>ficial status by their respective state or national<br />

governments, protection against the fraudulent use <strong>of</strong> the term<br />

"certified seed potatoes" has been assured. Disclaimer clauses<br />

limiting liability to the value <strong>of</strong> the seed are commonly used by<br />

all agencies to protect both the grower and the agency.<br />

Each agency publishes certification standards outlining<br />

eligibility requirements for inspection, grower fee schedule.<br />

disease tolerances, grade requirements, winter tests, and rules<br />

governing sale <strong>of</strong> certified seed. Application inspection forms<br />

are sent to individual growers before the planting seaso n<br />

requesting alisting <strong>of</strong> cultivars, classification and source <strong>of</strong> seed<br />

lots, acreage, field nu<strong>mb</strong>ers and location, previous crop history<br />

<strong>of</strong> fields, and date <strong>of</strong> planting. This information is used by the<br />

agency to determine eligibility for inspection.<br />

Fields are planted with pretested and approvea seedstocks.<br />

Practicesareadopted that minimizethespread <strong>of</strong>virusesand <strong>of</strong><br />

pathogens borne by soil and debris. Procedures for inspections<br />

vary among states but, in general, are quite similar. A minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> two field inspection- is made during the growing season at a<br />

time most opportune for detecting diseases and varietal<br />

mixtures by visual examination. Field tolerances fordisease and<br />

varietal mixtures vary among agencies but, in general, are quite<br />

similar. Those currently used in Wisconsin for the Certified class<br />

are fairly typical (Table V).<br />

Failure to meet the tolerances is cause for rejection and, in<br />

addition, certification may also be denied for the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

other diseases such as blackleg, haywire, or wilts. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />

isolation, unsuitable cultural conditions, high aphid<br />

populations, nematodes, unsatisfactory performance <strong>of</strong> test<br />

samples, orotherfactorsthat mayimpairseed valuemayalso be<br />

cause for rejection. Of the acreage rejected from 1968-1972 in<br />

North American agencies certifying over 1,000 acres per year,<br />

bacterial ring rot, leafroll, varietal mixture, mosaic, and<br />

blackleg accounted for 5.6, 0.8, 0.7, 0.5, and 0.4(,', respectively.<br />

Harvest inspections are required by some agencies, whereas<br />

others require both a harvest and a bin inspection, which<br />

identifies the stored seed and includes estimates <strong>of</strong> volume,<br />

grade, and tag eligibility. Certification is not complete until the<br />

seed has been graded for quality and size in conformity with seed<br />

grades and identified with <strong>of</strong>ficial tags and seals and has passed<br />

inspection by the State-Federal Inspection Service. Inspection<br />

reportsare issued to the grower by the inspectoraftereach field,<br />

harvest, and bin inspection.<br />

Most agencies in North America certify two basic classes <strong>of</strong><br />

seed potatoes-"Foundation" and "Certified." Requirements<br />

for the production <strong>of</strong> Foundation class seed are much more<br />

rigid, e.g., Foundation class seed growers mus, enter their entire<br />

acreage for inspection, field tolerances for disease are<br />

approximately one fourth <strong>of</strong> those allowed for Certified classes;<br />

and requirements for seed source, land, isolation, sanitation,<br />

the handling and storage <strong>of</strong> the crop are much more<br />

stringent. This class <strong>of</strong> seed isused to plant certified seed potato<br />

fields, Many certifying agencies require a winter test as part <strong>of</strong><br />

their Foundation class requirement. A few agencies have made<br />

it compulsory for all seed lots, irrespective <strong>of</strong> class. These tests,<br />

which are conducted in Alabama, California, or Florida, where<br />

wing conditin f a , Caiforia, o dieasere<br />

growing conditions favor symptom expression <strong>of</strong> diseases,<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> field planting 300-800 tubers per lot and reading the<br />

resulting plants for disease content, primarily 'irus, and other<br />

factors pertinent to seed productivity. To receive Foundation<br />

designation, most agencies require that a seed lot shall not show<br />

a total in excess <strong>of</strong> 0.5% <strong>of</strong> the diseases mosaic, leafroll, and<br />

spindle tuber in the winter field test.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the short interval between harvest and planting <strong>of</strong><br />

the winter test in Florida, dormancy <strong>of</strong>certain cultivars must be<br />

broken. Rindite, a 7:3:1 mixture <strong>of</strong> ethylene chlorohydrin (2chloroethanol),<br />

ethylene dichloride (I ,2-dichloroethane), and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!