Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Compendium of Potato Diseases - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the <strong>Potato</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> America).<br />
In 1914, Dr. Orton, accompanied by Dr. Appel <strong>of</strong> Germany,<br />
Dr. H. T. Gussow <strong>of</strong> Canada, Dr. Johanna Westerdijk <strong>of</strong><br />
Holland, and potato specialists from the USDA. visited the<br />
principal potato-growing areas <strong>of</strong> 13 states extending from<br />
Maine to California to study disease and other problems related<br />
to seed production. This study stimulated interest and added<br />
impetus to the movement for organized inspection programs.<br />
These efforts culminated i. the first <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>Potato</strong> Seed<br />
Certification Conference, which was held in Philadelphia, PA,<br />
on Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 28, 1914. Representatives from Canada.<br />
Germany, Ireland, the USDA, and 12 states participatud. At<br />
this conference, the basic framework <strong>of</strong> the present seed potato<br />
certification programs was formulated,<br />
Dr. Orton recommended that "a system <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial inspection<br />
and certification" be established in each <strong>of</strong> the seed-growing<br />
states, with emphasis being placed on "freedom from disease,<br />
varietal purity and vigor." The suggestion was also made that<br />
programs be administered by a "state agency such as an<br />
Experiment Station and protected by suitable legislation<br />
penalizing misu.,- <strong>of</strong> certificates." The proposal, which<br />
suggested that programs be operated on a voluntary basis and<br />
that growers stand the cost <strong>of</strong> inspection, also outlined<br />
procedures for making field inspections, established disease<br />
tolerances, suggested the use <strong>of</strong> certificates and <strong>of</strong>ficial tags for<br />
inspected seed, and proposed size and quality <strong>of</strong> tubers. Even<br />
though virus infections were not suspected at the time, the<br />
proposal recognized that "degeneration" or "running-out" <strong>of</strong><br />
seedstocks was tuber-transmitted and suggested that "seed"<br />
tubers be selected from healthy-appearing stocks.<br />
Seed potato certification programs in North America became<br />
a reality during 1913-1915, when Canada (New Brunswick and<br />
Prince Edward Island), Idaho, Maine, Maryland, Vermont. and<br />
Wisconsin established <strong>of</strong>ficial programs. Ten more states<br />
started programs between 1916 and 1919, followed by three<br />
additional Canadian provinces and eight states during<br />
1920-1922.<br />
In the early days <strong>of</strong> certification in North America, inspectors<br />
were confronted with the problems <strong>of</strong> varietal mixtures, varietal<br />
synonyms, and degeneration ur "running-out" <strong>of</strong> seed stocks.<br />
The confused picture <strong>of</strong> the degeneration complex started to<br />
clear when Quanjer et al in 1916 first established the infectious<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> potato leafroll by graft transmission; shortly<br />
thereafter, Oortwijn Botjes (1920) and Schultz and Folsom<br />
(1921) reported independently that the aphid Myzus persicae<br />
transmitted the causal entity <strong>of</strong> leafroll from plant to plant.<br />
Subsequent investigations exposed the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
numerous tuberborne virus diseases, such as mild and severe<br />
mosaic and spindle tuber (the causal agent <strong>of</strong> which is now<br />
known to be a viroid), with seed degeneration. Recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
these diseases by certification personnel provided the ba,: far<br />
their subsequent control. A tremendous improvement in yield<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong>seed stocks occurred after certificatior personnel<br />
had mastered the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> virus diseases,<br />
Present Day Seed <strong>Potato</strong> Certification<br />
eent DaypSd<strong>Potato</strong> Certification ayand<br />
Seed potato certification today represents a voluntary<br />
agreement between the seed grower and the certif.ing agency. In<br />
the United States, programs are handled by individual states<br />
TABLE V. Field Tolerances (%)for Certified <strong>Potato</strong>es, as Required<br />
by Wisconsin Certified Seed <strong>Potato</strong> Agency, Madison<br />
Disease or Varietal Inspection<br />
Mixture First Second or Subsequent<br />
Leafroll 1.5 1.0<br />
Mosaics 2.0 1.0<br />
Spindle tuber 1.0 1.0<br />
Total 3.0 3.0<br />
Bacterial ring rot 0.0 0.0<br />
Varietal mixture 1.0 0.1<br />
104<br />
and administered by state departments <strong>of</strong> agriculture, land<br />
grant universities, grower associations, or various co<strong>mb</strong>inations<br />
<strong>of</strong> these agencies. In Canada, seed potato certification is a<br />
federal program carried out hythe Plant Quarantine Division <strong>of</strong><br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Since all agencies have been<br />
given <strong>of</strong>ficial status by their respective state or national<br />
governments, protection against the fraudulent use <strong>of</strong> the term<br />
"certified seed potatoes" has been assured. Disclaimer clauses<br />
limiting liability to the value <strong>of</strong> the seed are commonly used by<br />
all agencies to protect both the grower and the agency.<br />
Each agency publishes certification standards outlining<br />
eligibility requirements for inspection, grower fee schedule.<br />
disease tolerances, grade requirements, winter tests, and rules<br />
governing sale <strong>of</strong> certified seed. Application inspection forms<br />
are sent to individual growers before the planting seaso n<br />
requesting alisting <strong>of</strong> cultivars, classification and source <strong>of</strong> seed<br />
lots, acreage, field nu<strong>mb</strong>ers and location, previous crop history<br />
<strong>of</strong> fields, and date <strong>of</strong> planting. This information is used by the<br />
agency to determine eligibility for inspection.<br />
Fields are planted with pretested and approvea seedstocks.<br />
Practicesareadopted that minimizethespread <strong>of</strong>virusesand <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogens borne by soil and debris. Procedures for inspections<br />
vary among states but, in general, are quite similar. A minimum<br />
<strong>of</strong> two field inspection- is made during the growing season at a<br />
time most opportune for detecting diseases and varietal<br />
mixtures by visual examination. Field tolerances fordisease and<br />
varietal mixtures vary among agencies but, in general, are quite<br />
similar. Those currently used in Wisconsin for the Certified class<br />
are fairly typical (Table V).<br />
Failure to meet the tolerances is cause for rejection and, in<br />
addition, certification may also be denied for the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
other diseases such as blackleg, haywire, or wilts. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />
isolation, unsuitable cultural conditions, high aphid<br />
populations, nematodes, unsatisfactory performance <strong>of</strong> test<br />
samples, orotherfactorsthat mayimpairseed valuemayalso be<br />
cause for rejection. Of the acreage rejected from 1968-1972 in<br />
North American agencies certifying over 1,000 acres per year,<br />
bacterial ring rot, leafroll, varietal mixture, mosaic, and<br />
blackleg accounted for 5.6, 0.8, 0.7, 0.5, and 0.4(,', respectively.<br />
Harvest inspections are required by some agencies, whereas<br />
others require both a harvest and a bin inspection, which<br />
identifies the stored seed and includes estimates <strong>of</strong> volume,<br />
grade, and tag eligibility. Certification is not complete until the<br />
seed has been graded for quality and size in conformity with seed<br />
grades and identified with <strong>of</strong>ficial tags and seals and has passed<br />
inspection by the State-Federal Inspection Service. Inspection<br />
reportsare issued to the grower by the inspectoraftereach field,<br />
harvest, and bin inspection.<br />
Most agencies in North America certify two basic classes <strong>of</strong><br />
seed potatoes-"Foundation" and "Certified." Requirements<br />
for the production <strong>of</strong> Foundation class seed are much more<br />
rigid, e.g., Foundation class seed growers mus, enter their entire<br />
acreage for inspection, field tolerances for disease are<br />
approximately one fourth <strong>of</strong> those allowed for Certified classes;<br />
and requirements for seed source, land, isolation, sanitation,<br />
the handling and storage <strong>of</strong> the crop are much more<br />
stringent. This class <strong>of</strong> seed isused to plant certified seed potato<br />
fields, Many certifying agencies require a winter test as part <strong>of</strong><br />
their Foundation class requirement. A few agencies have made<br />
it compulsory for all seed lots, irrespective <strong>of</strong> class. These tests,<br />
which are conducted in Alabama, California, or Florida, where<br />
wing conditin f a , Caiforia, o dieasere<br />
growing conditions favor symptom expression <strong>of</strong> diseases,<br />
consist <strong>of</strong> field planting 300-800 tubers per lot and reading the<br />
resulting plants for disease content, primarily 'irus, and other<br />
factors pertinent to seed productivity. To receive Foundation<br />
designation, most agencies require that a seed lot shall not show<br />
a total in excess <strong>of</strong> 0.5% <strong>of</strong> the diseases mosaic, leafroll, and<br />
spindle tuber in the winter field test.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the short interval between harvest and planting <strong>of</strong><br />
the winter test in Florida, dormancy <strong>of</strong>certain cultivars must be<br />
broken. Rindite, a 7:3:1 mixture <strong>of</strong> ethylene chlorohydrin (2chloroethanol),<br />
ethylene dichloride (I ,2-dichloroethane), and