special - Alu-web.de
special - Alu-web.de
special - Alu-web.de
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ALUMINIUM EXTRUSION INDUSTRY<br />
Fig. 6: Feed force during flow-drilling of continuously reinforced aluminium profiles<br />
a thread which is true to gauge can<br />
be produced in any investigated position<br />
relative to the reinforcing element.<br />
The number of usable threads<br />
is increased compared to the original<br />
wall thickness by means of the flowdrilling<br />
operation. As shown in Fig.<br />
7, the shape of the flanks differs with<br />
the threading operation and the position<br />
of the hole relative to the reinforcing<br />
elements.<br />
Thread forming in non-reinforced<br />
aluminium material results in regular<br />
shaped thread flanks with typical<br />
split crests [9]. The upper part of<br />
the collar is wi<strong>de</strong>ned due to radial<br />
forces. As a consequence, the teeth<br />
are not completely formed in this<br />
area. The machining of reinforced<br />
profiles leads to irregularities in the<br />
area where the wires are located after<br />
the flow-drilling operation. Due to<br />
the different flow characteristics of<br />
the two materials, there are unequal<br />
crests of threads, however the roots<br />
of the threads are well shaped. When<br />
using a cutting operation to produce<br />
threads like tapping or thread milling,<br />
the reinforcing elements are well<br />
integrated into the flanks, regardless<br />
of the position of the hole relative to<br />
the reinforcement. The thickness of<br />
the collar <strong>de</strong>creases with the height<br />
of the collar. In the upper part of the<br />
collar, the <strong>de</strong>pth of cut exceeds the<br />
wall thickness. Therefore parts of the<br />
collar can be cut off.<br />
For quantitative analysis of the<br />
machining results, tensile tests were<br />
conducted on a universal testing machine.<br />
A threa<strong>de</strong>d stud was screwed<br />
into the workpiece at one end and<br />
fixed to a clamping <strong>de</strong>vice at its other<br />
end. During testing, the workpiece is<br />
moved relative to the stud in the direction<br />
of the central axis of the hole<br />
with a <strong>de</strong>fined speed while forces<br />
are recor<strong>de</strong>d. The maximum tensile<br />
force is charted for a sample of five<br />
threads in each case. Fig. 8 shows the<br />
mean values as well as the margin<br />
of error. In addition to tensile tests<br />
Fig. 7: Qualitative analysis of threads produced by thread forming, tapping and thread milling<br />
with threads that were produced by<br />
flow-drilling in combination with a<br />
subsequent threading operation, tests<br />
with samples that have no collar were<br />
conducted to see the effect of the additional<br />
lateral area on the maximum<br />
tensile force. The holes of these samples<br />
were produced by circular milling.<br />
The benefit of the collar is obvious<br />
in most cases and particularly high for<br />
a subsequent thread forming operation.<br />
The position of the hole relative<br />
to the reinforcing wires is a major<br />
influencing factor on the maximum<br />
tensile force.<br />
While the increase in transferable<br />
tensile forces due to the collar is about<br />
ΔFz = 5 - 10 kN for every threading<br />
operation without wire or with two<br />
consecutive wires, the benefit of the<br />
flow-drilling operation is significantly<br />
smaller for a position of the holes<br />
with one reinforcing element in the<br />
middle. The displacement of the wire<br />
enhances the cracking within the collar.<br />
As seen in Fig. 7, this reduces the<br />
40 ALUMINIUM · 4/2010