the book of ceremonial magic contents - Yankeeclassic.com
the book of ceremonial magic contents - Yankeeclassic.com
the book of ceremonial magic contents - Yankeeclassic.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
empowered <strong>the</strong>e, whereunto I now adjure <strong>the</strong>e to appear it; power and presence, that I<br />
may sing with His Holy Angels O MAPPA LAMAN, HALLELUJAH. AMEN.<br />
p. 77<br />
When he appears, says <strong>the</strong> Ritual, give him a kind entertainment; ask what is lawful,<br />
possible and be<strong>com</strong>ing to his <strong>of</strong>fice; and you shall obtain it. If, however, he should fail to<br />
appear, <strong>the</strong> four candles must be marked with <strong>the</strong> gold or silver seal, which apparently<br />
will ensure obedience.<br />
There are, however, certain planetary considerations connected with this process, on<br />
which its success depends. The two first Angels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> First Altitude can only be called<br />
on <strong>the</strong> first and second Sunday in March; <strong>the</strong> third and fourth on <strong>the</strong> Sundays in April; <strong>the</strong><br />
fifth after <strong>the</strong> sun has entered Gemini in May. And so <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest in succession.<br />
§ 5. The Fourth Book <strong>of</strong> Cornelius Agrippa<br />
It is a matter now almost <strong>of</strong> general knowledge that a Fourth Book <strong>of</strong> Occult Philosophy<br />
is attributed to Cornelius Agrippa, and that it is rejected as spurious. The au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> famous three <strong>book</strong>s has never been questioned and is indeed beyond challenge; <strong>the</strong><br />
fourth is perhaps less interesting from <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> its <strong>contents</strong> than from this question <strong>of</strong><br />
its authorship. It is, at <strong>the</strong> same time, a much more skilful performance than <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>mon<br />
run <strong>of</strong> <strong>magic</strong>al impostures; it connects with and rises out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genuine work in a very<br />
curious manner; and, having regard to <strong>the</strong> special <strong>magic</strong>al <strong>com</strong>plexion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
might seem no inherent reason why it should not have been <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> Agrippa.<br />
The difficulties concerning it may be reduced to three heads. One is <strong>of</strong> time; it appeared<br />
after <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> restless speculating philosopher <strong>of</strong> Nettersheim. Now, a posthumous<br />
publication is not necessarily open to suspicion unless it is a treatise on Magic, but a<br />
treatise on Magic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period concerned, not appearing in <strong>the</strong> lifetime <strong>of</strong> its writer, is<br />
open to <strong>the</strong> gravest suspicion, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scandalous <strong>com</strong>pany to which it belongs.<br />
The<br />
second difficulty is internal, and I do not think that it can be overridden. It is to a<br />
considerable extent a rechauffé <strong>of</strong> various portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three undisputed <strong>book</strong>s, and,<br />
even in <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> Agrippa, it is not likely that any author would have so liberally<br />
reproduced himself. The third difficulty is that it was rejected as a forgery by Wierus, <strong>the</strong><br />
pupil <strong>of</strong> Agrippa, who must have had a good opportunity <strong>of</strong> knowing; its rejection by<br />
later writers simply follows <strong>the</strong> lead <strong>of</strong> Wierus, and is <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>of</strong> no moment. The<br />
strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case against it lies mainly in <strong>the</strong> third difficulty, but o<strong>the</strong>r objections are<br />
possible. Though not <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Agrippa, it was evidently produced in immediate<br />
proximity to his period.<br />
The <strong>book</strong> itself, which is quite informally written, falls into several divisions. There is,<br />
firstly, an elaborate treatise on <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> extracting <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> good and evil<br />
spirits referred to <strong>the</strong> seven planets. This is a fur<strong>the</strong>r development <strong>of</strong> a subject treated at<br />
some length in <strong>the</strong> third <strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Occult Philosophy. The method is <strong>of</strong> no importance to<br />
our inquiry, but those who have sought to unravel it confess that <strong>the</strong>y have been baffled. I