10.01.2013 Views

m - DISA

m - DISA

m - DISA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

»<br />

DETENTIONS:<br />

Rabie Reports<br />

JUBT two days after the flaport of the Rabie Commission<br />

into Security Laglelation ems weds public, trade<br />

unionist Neil Aggett died ehile In security police<br />

ouetody. The Rebie Commissioners put fprewrd certain<br />

propoeale 'with a view to the protection of detainees" x<br />

if this additional 'protection had already been in<br />

fares, could the outcoee of Nell Aggstt'e prolonged<br />

incarceration and interrogation have been different?<br />

Evan the briefest glance at the nable proposals<br />

regarding detention lndlcotes that the Commission<br />

report offers almost no change to the systam of<br />

detention as it currently exists. The section of<br />

( the report dealing elth detention of paopla for<br />

purposes of interrogation offers little comfort for<br />

ttiqae ooncarned elth the conditions under ahich<br />

detainaea are held and questioned. Nor, it eust be"<br />

stated, would the table propoeale have of farad any<br />

additional protection for thota detainees who nave<br />

recently found thaaaelvaa-in the sards of<br />

/Johannesburg's General Hoepltal* For the<br />

racoaaandationa flowing fro- the Coaalsalon report do<br />

little ear* then regulariee and give legislative<br />

legitimacy to the detention ayetaa as it already<br />

* This can be shown by coaparing the Rabie<br />

propoeale with the detention systea as it 9<br />

currently exists* In this regard, see the table<br />

on> this page.<br />

If the heble propoeala had bean in force in<br />

November last year, when Nell Aggett eaa detained<br />

for purposes of interrogation, hoe would his<br />

detention conditions have been alterad? m<br />

m Ha aould have bean visited by a aagistrate every<br />

teo weeks - ahich muet have happened st any rats;<br />

a Hs could have bean examined by a district surgeon -<br />

RABIE PROPOSALS<br />

Visits to dstalneee by a<br />

two week's<br />

tiatrate every<br />

Visits to tfatalneea by a district surgeon"<br />

%y%ry two<br />

Tne setting to of an inspectorate of<br />

detainees, ampowsred to visit detainees<br />

and to sake writtan representations to<br />

the Minister<br />

Police be empowered<br />

to allow people not connected with<br />

Interrogation to see detainees<br />

A 30-day limit be placed on detention<br />

unless the Minuter, on the advice of the<br />

Commissioner of Police, authorises<br />

further attention<br />

After 0 months of detention, a review ~~<br />

board appointed by the Minister must<br />

examine the caea. The board than raporte<br />

to the fctinioter, who may or may not accept<br />

their recommendations as to the release<br />

or continued detention of the detains*<br />

Preventive detention propoaod, together<br />

with a review board to examine auch cases<br />

Potential state witnesses in security<br />

trials may be detained at the discretion<br />

of the attorney general<br />

Any policeman of or above the rank of<br />

warrant officer may detain a person for up<br />

to 46 hours as a preventive measure; a<br />

magistrate may extend this period for<br />

another 12 days on request of the police.<br />

This detention is not for interrogation,<br />

nor does it appaar that the detaining<br />

policeman muet beliave that a crime has<br />

or is likely to be, committed<br />

?ras«v*i ; a*'>::ii' : j<br />

visits to detainee* by a magletrate every<br />

two weeks (section 0(7) of Terra-lam Act<br />

Visits ahare necessary to detainees by s<br />

district surgeon (paction 8 of the police<br />

-rant for detention)<br />

While there is no legislation regarding thlst<br />

much an inspectorate was est up by thenpolice<br />

minister Krugsr after the death of<br />

Steve Biko in 1977<br />

6oth the Consniealoner of Police and the head<br />

oT security police ampowered to grant access<br />

to detainees in to*"** of section 2 of the<br />

police warrant for detention<br />

Section 6(1 J of the Terroriaw Act Allows for"<br />

Indefinite detention- However* ones a month<br />

police are required to lnfona the Minister<br />

why aach detainee ahould continue to be held<br />

(•action 0(2))<br />

nWlaw proceecfinge unoWtaRan by a board<br />

appointed by9 and responsible to the<br />

Minister exist in respect of preventive<br />

detention (section 10 of the Internal<br />

Security. Act.<br />

In terms of aeotlort 6*3) of the Terrorism<br />

Act, a detainee may *t any time mafca<br />

written representatlone to the Minister as<br />

to why he/she should be released. The<br />

Minister may. at eYW time, order the release<br />

of A detainee (flection 6><br />

Section TO of the internal security Act<br />

provides for preventive detention, together<br />

with a review board to examine auch detentions<br />

Potential state witnesses in security trials<br />

may be detained at the discretion of the<br />

attorney general<br />

Section, 10 of the Internal Security Act<br />

provides for preventive detention.<br />

Section 22 of the « « General Laws<br />

Amenowent Act provides for detention for<br />

interrogation purposes for MP to 14 days.<br />

Any policeman may, if he believes that a<br />

a crime haa bean, or is likely to be<br />

committed, may arn#sf a auapect, and hold<br />

the arrested person for 40 hours before<br />

bringing them to court or releasing them

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!