You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
»<br />
DETENTIONS:<br />
Rabie Reports<br />
JUBT two days after the flaport of the Rabie Commission<br />
into Security Laglelation ems weds public, trade<br />
unionist Neil Aggett died ehile In security police<br />
ouetody. The Rebie Commissioners put fprewrd certain<br />
propoeale 'with a view to the protection of detainees" x<br />
if this additional 'protection had already been in<br />
fares, could the outcoee of Nell Aggstt'e prolonged<br />
incarceration and interrogation have been different?<br />
Evan the briefest glance at the nable proposals<br />
regarding detention lndlcotes that the Commission<br />
report offers almost no change to the systam of<br />
detention as it currently exists. The section of<br />
( the report dealing elth detention of paopla for<br />
purposes of interrogation offers little comfort for<br />
ttiqae ooncarned elth the conditions under ahich<br />
detainaea are held and questioned. Nor, it eust be"<br />
stated, would the table propoeale have of farad any<br />
additional protection for thota detainees who nave<br />
recently found thaaaelvaa-in the sards of<br />
/Johannesburg's General Hoepltal* For the<br />
racoaaandationa flowing fro- the Coaalsalon report do<br />
little ear* then regulariee and give legislative<br />
legitimacy to the detention ayetaa as it already<br />
* This can be shown by coaparing the Rabie<br />
propoeale with the detention systea as it 9<br />
currently exists* In this regard, see the table<br />
on> this page.<br />
If the heble propoeala had bean in force in<br />
November last year, when Nell Aggett eaa detained<br />
for purposes of interrogation, hoe would his<br />
detention conditions have been alterad? m<br />
m Ha aould have bean visited by a aagistrate every<br />
teo weeks - ahich muet have happened st any rats;<br />
a Hs could have bean examined by a district surgeon -<br />
RABIE PROPOSALS<br />
Visits to dstalneee by a<br />
two week's<br />
tiatrate every<br />
Visits to tfatalneea by a district surgeon"<br />
%y%ry two<br />
Tne setting to of an inspectorate of<br />
detainees, ampowsred to visit detainees<br />
and to sake writtan representations to<br />
the Minister<br />
Police be empowered<br />
to allow people not connected with<br />
Interrogation to see detainees<br />
A 30-day limit be placed on detention<br />
unless the Minuter, on the advice of the<br />
Commissioner of Police, authorises<br />
further attention<br />
After 0 months of detention, a review ~~<br />
board appointed by the Minister must<br />
examine the caea. The board than raporte<br />
to the fctinioter, who may or may not accept<br />
their recommendations as to the release<br />
or continued detention of the detains*<br />
Preventive detention propoaod, together<br />
with a review board to examine auch cases<br />
Potential state witnesses in security<br />
trials may be detained at the discretion<br />
of the attorney general<br />
Any policeman of or above the rank of<br />
warrant officer may detain a person for up<br />
to 46 hours as a preventive measure; a<br />
magistrate may extend this period for<br />
another 12 days on request of the police.<br />
This detention is not for interrogation,<br />
nor does it appaar that the detaining<br />
policeman muet beliave that a crime has<br />
or is likely to be, committed<br />
?ras«v*i ; a*'>::ii' : j<br />
visits to detainee* by a magletrate every<br />
two weeks (section 0(7) of Terra-lam Act<br />
Visits ahare necessary to detainees by s<br />
district surgeon (paction 8 of the police<br />
-rant for detention)<br />
While there is no legislation regarding thlst<br />
much an inspectorate was est up by thenpolice<br />
minister Krugsr after the death of<br />
Steve Biko in 1977<br />
6oth the Consniealoner of Police and the head<br />
oT security police ampowered to grant access<br />
to detainees in to*"** of section 2 of the<br />
police warrant for detention<br />
Section 6(1 J of the Terroriaw Act Allows for"<br />
Indefinite detention- However* ones a month<br />
police are required to lnfona the Minister<br />
why aach detainee ahould continue to be held<br />
(•action 0(2))<br />
nWlaw proceecfinge unoWtaRan by a board<br />
appointed by9 and responsible to the<br />
Minister exist in respect of preventive<br />
detention (section 10 of the Internal<br />
Security. Act.<br />
In terms of aeotlort 6*3) of the Terrorism<br />
Act, a detainee may *t any time mafca<br />
written representatlone to the Minister as<br />
to why he/she should be released. The<br />
Minister may. at eYW time, order the release<br />
of A detainee (flection 6><br />
Section TO of the internal security Act<br />
provides for preventive detention, together<br />
with a review board to examine auch detentions<br />
Potential state witnesses in security trials<br />
may be detained at the discretion of the<br />
attorney general<br />
Section, 10 of the Internal Security Act<br />
provides for preventive detention.<br />
Section 22 of the « « General Laws<br />
Amenowent Act provides for detention for<br />
interrogation purposes for MP to 14 days.<br />
Any policeman may, if he believes that a<br />
a crime haa bean, or is likely to be<br />
committed, may arn#sf a auapect, and hold<br />
the arrested person for 40 hours before<br />
bringing them to court or releasing them