10.01.2013 Views

m - DISA

m - DISA

m - DISA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

£o natch 'their transport to gat home on weekends -<br />

f which the coapany agreed to. Tha company also agreed<br />

* to review tha cancellation of overtime on sookende.<br />

Dewmnda involving wagee could only be reviewed in<br />

J April and Octobar, coapany officials said. Tha<br />

negotiations took place betas en management and tha<br />

Oranga-vaal General workere* Union.<br />

Coca Col* Itorahouas (Florida): Drivers at Coca Cola<br />

stoppsd work for a few hour*- Thay wanted to discuss<br />

working conditions, apaclfically tha long hours they<br />

vara required to won* (Star, 20.02.62).<br />

Ho further news*<br />

Colotte-Palaolive (Sokaburg)i For background, sea<br />

WP 18144-5; 19:34-5; 20:43, A recognition egrssmsnt<br />

between Colgate-Palmolive and the F06ATU-effilleted<br />

Chemical lorkara* Industrial Union (CWIU) eae signed<br />

, In August. 1981 (see VIP 20:43). Vega negotiations<br />

vent on for moat of February this year. They were the<br />

first negotiations since the recognition egreemont<br />

(m result of a 4 month strike). Workers et Colgate-<br />

Pelmollve will not receive a minimum of R1,95 an<br />

hour In Hey, to be Increased to a minimum of R2,04<br />

in November.<br />

Corobrlk (Bedfordwiew): Abeut 500 workers downed<br />

tools at Corobrlk on 1 February. Thay sere demanding<br />

that Corobrlk sign e recognition agreement eith their<br />

FOSATU-affiliated Glass and Allied Itorkers' Union.<br />

The union clelmed that management wee demanding<br />

Industrie! council membership as a prerequisite for<br />

union recognition, Workers elso clelmed that the<br />

company ems refusing to recognise the union because it<br />

was not registered, management seld that it see merely<br />

reateting its position, adopted in December last year.<br />

The striking workers eere considered to have<br />

'discharged themselves'. Imvtegement maid that they<br />

eould bm re employed selectively if they applied for<br />

their Job*.<br />

Diamond Cutting Industry: (For earlier information<br />

on the diamond cutting industry, see WIP7:3Si 16:44).<br />

L.J ven dan Bergh (25) sppeorsrt in the magistrate's<br />

court In llsrch, 1982, for allegedly breaking an<br />

Industrial council agreement. The agreement states<br />

that if a diamond cutter leevse hie Job, he must melt<br />

three monthe before joining another employer within<br />

tha trade* If he re-enters the trade lnalda three<br />

months, he is bound to return to his former employer.<br />

Van dan Bergh pleaded not guilty. He said ha<br />

mme employed by Jooste Diamond Cutting Works until<br />

July 24, 1981. Intending to become a carpenter, ha<br />

left the firm. Before leaving he signed a document<br />

setting out the conditions (outlined above) under ehich<br />

he could return to the trade. The following Monday<br />

he Joined LC Diamond Cutting works. Ha said that he<br />

was under the impression that the agreement was not<br />

binding on him because he had resigned from the SA<br />

Oiaaond Cut tare' Union.<br />

The magistrate found the agrsmaent to be binding.<br />

He also found Van den Bergh guilty of breaking It.<br />

Distillers Corporation (ffadeville): The dismissal of<br />

three workers et Distillers Corporation resulted in<br />

about 800 workers downing tools. The workers claimed<br />

that management had broken en agreement between them<br />

when the workers eere fired. According to the j<br />

agreement management was required to cbnault the shop<br />

stewards whan disputes arose. Workers aeld that<br />

the three had been victimised for their union activities<br />

(Sowatan, 24.02.62).<br />

No further news.<br />

Dresser SA (wadevllle): Between 300 and 400 workers<br />

downed tools demanding e rand-en-hour Increase on<br />

their wages. Workers said that a coapany official had<br />

not addresssd them when they had initially aaked for<br />

the Increase. How that thay ware on strike the worker a<br />

refused to enter into negotiations with management.<br />

They wanted an ens ear of 'yes' or 'no* to their<br />

demands.<br />

After three deys the workers agreed to return to<br />

work on condition that aanagament had talks with UASJU<br />

on a recognition and procedural agreement. The terms<br />

elso included telks with an interim committee of<br />

workers which would replace the existing works<br />

committee, end an assurance that tha striking workers<br />

would not be victimised.<br />

Dunlop Industrial Products (Benonl)t On 1 February,<br />

199?, 300 workers demanded higher wages (Boweten,<br />

02.03.62).<br />

No further news. *<br />

EMES (Geraiston): 40 workers demanded pay increases*<br />

They downed tools for a day amd then returned to work<br />

although their demmnds had not been mat (Star,<br />

12.03.82).<br />

Fensecure (Geraiston): At this firm 30 worksrs went<br />

on atrlks demanding to be paid a minimum wage of<br />

R2,00 en hour. Thay elso expressed dissatisfaction<br />

that their pay slips did not reflect their hourly<br />

wage, and that their weekly wages ware not consistent,<br />

ie they were sometimes paid R47,00 and sometimes<br />

paid R60.00 par week (6owetant 09.03.8?).<br />

Ho further news.<br />

Fanner SA (laando)i At this firm about ISO workers<br />

struck demanding an Increase of R1,00 an hour. Thay<br />

returned to work efter management said that they would<br />

not discuss e new increase until after the Industrial<br />

Council negotiation* next month (ROM, 17.03,62).<br />

Flak ear (wadevllle) i Workers at this metal company<br />

downed toole on 18 March, in protest against the<br />

dismissal of three of their co-workers. A union shop<br />

steward was sent to negotiate with aanagament, who<br />

claimed that the workers eere just being laid off<br />

for e month. The striking workers claimed that the<br />

dismissed workers had been victimised.<br />

The following day thw striking workers returned<br />

to worH, but threatened further action if tne sew* were<br />

not reinstated. MMU said that it eae attempting<br />

further negotiations with management on the dispute<br />

(RDM, 20.03.62).<br />

No further news,<br />

fuens Electrical Industries (Alberton): About 600<br />

worksrs downed tools and demmnded higher wegee. Ihen<br />

the strike had entered its fourth day the eorkere<br />

elected representatives to negotiate on their<br />

behelf, and returned to work (Sowatan* 17.03.82).<br />

Oreyhound Bus Lines (Krugsredarp): (For background<br />

on this firm sew wTP17i4flj 20*43).<br />

Following the etrlke in February, 1961, a<br />

preliminary recognition agreement was drawn up by<br />

tha Traneport and Allied Workers* Union (TAWU).<br />

The compeny signed it In December, 1901 (flOU, 17.f2.Bl).<br />

Harvey Tiles (Bcksburg): Workere et Harvey Tiles<br />

claimed that their employers had breeched en agreement<br />

about night shifts. Management had originally<br />

stated that night shift mould cease on 9 December,<br />

and had then Ordered it to ceeee on 4 Dec amber.<br />

Workers ware locked out when thay arrived for<br />

their night ehlft on 7 December, mnd told to return<br />

the following morning. On thmt morning 30 workers<br />

refused to work the dey shift, end were ell dismissed.<br />

then the company reopened on 6 January, 1982, efter<br />

the Christmas break, the dismissed workers were not<br />

allowed baok.<br />

Forty of their co-workers want on strike in their<br />

support. All 70 worksrs sere offered their Jobs<br />

back but refused end ware ell dismissed. UAHj claims<br />

that tha compeny has violetad an Industrial Council<br />

sgreemsnt compelling companies to notify tha Council<br />

when dismissing worksrs. HAWU is considering charging<br />

the company for heving locked out lte employees on<br />

7 Oeceaber (Sowatan, 20.01.82).<br />

No further news.<br />

Hawker Slddeley Africa: 150 employees et Hewker<br />

Slddeley downed tools demanding the reinstatement of<br />

two of their colleagues and en Increase of R1,00 an<br />

hour. They returned to work while management held<br />

talks with IWTU (Sowatan, 04.03.62).<br />

Henkel (Isendo): A helf-hour work atoppage occurred<br />

at this firm, takers et the Isanda plant cam* out<br />

in support of a strike by fellow workers at the Natal<br />

plant (see below) (RON, 11.03,62). .<br />

JH Henochsberg (Ooornfontain)t About 140 worker*<br />

staged a briar work stoppage at thle firm on 6 March.<br />

The National Union of Clothing workers (NUCW) said<br />

that ths cause was an Industrial Council agreement<br />

that was sxplring in June, •orkere were demanding<br />

pay increases and management granted a A3,00 weakly<br />

increase efter the stoppage,<br />

HlghvBld Bua Company : A strlks occurred at this<br />

company during October, 1961. No further news<br />

(ROW, 15.10.61).<br />

Holloaac (Gerraiston): A strike by B0 workers<br />

occurred on 10 Usrch, 1962. Their wage demands<br />

were not met, but they returned to work tha following<br />

day. management said that negotiations with a works<br />

council were proceeding (Star, 12.03.62).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!